Tether’s Mega-Freeze: $344M USDT Locked Down In Major Operation With US Authorities

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-04-24Última atualização em 2026-04-24

Resumo

Tether has frozen $344 million in USDT held in two Tron wallets at the request of US authorities, including OFAC, after the wallets were linked to sanctions evasion and criminal activity. The company emphasized its routine cooperation with global law enforcement, having supported over 2,300 cases and frozen more than $4.4 billion in assets to date. This action contrasts with increased scrutiny on rival stablecoin issuer Circle, which faces a lawsuit over its alleged failure to promptly freeze $280 million stolen in the Drift Protocol hack. Tether also announced a collaboration with Drift Protocol to support recovery efforts with nearly $150 million in backing.

Crypto giant Tether disclosed that it has supported the US government in freezing $344 million in USDT held in two Tron wallets, following a request from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US law enforcement.

Tether’s Latest Crackdown

According to Tether’s Thursday disclosure, the freeze came after authorities allegedly identified the wallets as linked to sanctions evasion, criminal networks, or other illicit activity.

The company framed this as part of its routine response to lawful requests from governments in the US and abroad, noting that it works with more than 340 law enforcement agencies across 65 countries.

In a statement, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino emphasized that USDT should not be used as a “safe haven” for wrongdoing. He argued that when Tether sees credible links to sanctioned entities or criminal networks, it acts quickly and decisively.

Beyond this specific freeze, Tether said its broader cooperation has supported more than 2,300 cases globally, including over 1,200 tied to US law enforcement.

The company added that those efforts have contributed to the freezing of more than $4.4 billion in assets, including over $2.1 billion linked to US authorities.

Circle Under Fire

Tether’s move comes as the industry’s second-largest stablecoin issuer, Circle (CRCL), which issues USDC, has faced increased scrutiny. The firm has faced criticism for what some describe as a lack of similarly prompt actions.

The issue was highlighted after the Drift Protocol hack in early April, when reports alleged that in several widely documented thefts and hacks, the issuer either delayed freezing responses or did not freeze funds at all—allowing attackers to move large sums across blockchains and convert them into other assets.

That controversy is now tied to legal action. NewsBTC reported last week that Circle is facing a fresh lawsuit in Massachusetts connected to the $280 million Drift Protocol hack.

The complaint alleges that Circle did not freeze stolen funds even though it allegedly had both the technical capability and contractual authority to do so.

The allegations include that attackers were able to offload up to $230 million onto the Ethereum blockchain by leveraging Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), according to the lawsuit’s framing.

Plaintiffs say this ability to transfer stablecoin-related assets during the period when funds were being moved is central to why they believe Circle should have prevented the transfers.

While Circle faces accusations over the Drift incident, Tether announced a strategic collaboration with the Drift Protocol. Tether said the effort is intended to support user recovery and help relaunch the Drift platform.

The collaboration, Tether said, creates a structured recovery plan supported by up to nearly $150 million in combined backing, including up to $127.5 million from the company.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.58 trillion as of Thursday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the amount of USDT frozen by Tether in collaboration with US authorities, and on which blockchain were the wallets located?

ATether froze $344 million in USDT held in two wallets on the Tron blockchain.

QWhich US government agency requested the freeze of the assets, and what was the alleged reason for the action?

AThe freeze was requested by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US law enforcement, as the wallets were allegedly linked to sanctions evasion, criminal networks, or other illicit activity.

QHow does Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino characterize the company's stance on the use of USDT for illicit activities?

APaolo Ardoino emphasized that USDT should not be used as a 'safe haven' for wrongdoing and stated that Tether acts quickly and decisively when it sees credible links to sanctioned entities or criminal networks.

QWhat controversy is the stablecoin issuer Circle facing, as mentioned in the article?

ACircle is facing a lawsuit in Massachusetts related to the $280 million Drift Protocol hack, with allegations that it did not freeze stolen funds despite having the technical capability and contractual authority to do so.

QWhat is the nature of Tether's newly announced collaboration with the Drift Protocol?

ATether announced a strategic collaboration with the Drift Protocol to support user recovery and help relaunch the platform, creating a structured recovery plan backed by up to nearly $150 million, including up to $127.5 million from Tether.

Leituras Relacionadas

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

The meme coin competition is shifting from community hype to technological and ecosystem advantages. This analysis contrasts Bonk, an established token on the Solana network known for its speed and low costs, with the newer Little Pepe ($LILPEPE), currently in its presale phase. Bonk leverages its mature community and Solana's infrastructure, while Little Pepe differentiates itself with a Layer 2 Ethereum solution promising tax-free trading, staking rewards, and enhanced scalability. To drive engagement, Little Pepe is offering substantial giveaways totaling $777,000. Both coins, despite their different strategies—Bonk as a proven ecosystem and Little Pepe as an early-stage utility project—are capturing significant market attention as demand surges.

TheNewsCryptoHá 30m

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

TheNewsCryptoHá 30m

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

A US law enforcement task force has frozen over $700 million in cryptocurrency linked to investment scams targeting Americans. The operation, which involved cooperation from crypto exchanges and legal processes, also took down more than 500 fraudulent websites and a Telegram channel used to recruit victims. Two Chinese nationals were named in arrest warrants for operating a scam compound in Burma. In a related move, the US State Department announced a $10 million reward for information disrupting scam centers in Burma. Singaporean authorities, alongside major crypto exchanges and analytics firms, also prevented nearly $3 million in losses through a parallel operation. The scale of cybercrime remains vast, with the FBI reporting over $20 billion in losses in 2025.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

bitcoinistHá 1h

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that the Toncoin (TON) network will reduce transaction fees by six times in one week, lowering the cost to just 0.00039 TON (approximately $0.0005). This fee reduction is part of the "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) roadmap and will remain fixed regardless of network congestion. The update follows a recent upgrade that made the network 10 times faster and transactions nearly instant. Durov also hinted that future steps aim to make most transactions fully feeless. Although Telegram discontinued formal involvement with TON due to regulatory issues, Durov remains a strong supporter. Currently, Toncoin is trading around $1.30, down over 8% in the past week.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

bitcoinistHá 1h

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHá 2h

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHá 2h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHá 3h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow