Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-06-17Última atualização em 2026-06-17

Resumo

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (June 17) This is an informal column sharing real-time thoughts from Odaily's editorial team on industry news, data, and events. The content is based on actual investment and observations, does not constitute investment advice, and aims to expand perspectives. Azuma shared recent operations: small-scale buys in crypto (mainly BTC) at relatively high levels, a small addition to HOOD stock, and participation in World Cup prediction markets. He also discussed Hyperliquid, noting that while its token HYPE has performed well, its high price may hinder the expansion of its HIP-3 ecosystem by making market creation cost-prohibitive, potentially limiting the platform to just one major market (trade.xyz). Suzz emphasized the importance of a calm mindset in investing, stating that markets offer perpetual opportunities. He warned against "hindsight bias," where past opportunities seem obvious, and stressed that the present always holds new chances for those with the right knowledge and temperament. Golem analyzed SpaceX's acquisition of AI tool Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion paid entirely in SpaceX stock. He speculated whether Musk's interests might work to keep SpaceX's trading volume and market cap high in the short term to reduce the actual equity cost of the deal, noting current high retail investor enthusiasm. Wenser shared a market outlook: cautiously bullish on BTC, monitoring SpaceX stock post-IPO for a potential rise, ...

This is an 'informal' column from within the Odaily editorial department. Here, the author shares immediate thoughts and different perspectives on industry news, data, hot events, and their peripheral details; expands upon investment ideas and opportunity hypotheses still under verification—they are not necessarily direct wealth passwords, they could just be questions themselves; shares observations gained from communicating with industry practitioners; and shares materials that have genuinely enhanced our understanding, whether internal or external.

This column's content is based on the real investment and observation experiences of Odaily editorial team members. It does not accept any form of commercial advertising, nor does it constitute investment advice (after all, we are equally experienced in losing money). Its purpose is solely to broaden perspectives and supplement sources of information, not to manufacture consensus. Welcome to join the Odaily community (Telegram discussion group, X official account) to exchange ideas, raise doubts, and banter together.

Azuma(@azuma_eth)

Introduction: Novice, learning more.

Sharing: 1. Recent trading has been slightly more frequent than before. In Crypto, took the opportunity during the recent dip to make some small-scale buys (mainly BTC), but the entry points were generally high (6.2-6.6k), so there's basically no profit; In US stocks, added a small amount to HOOD, the logic was explained in an article a couple of days ago; Also, playing the World Cup on prediction markets, simultaneously doing small-scale, high-frequency copy trading (testing a new tool, feeling good for now, will recommend after a few more days) + large-scale, low-frequency active orders.

2. HYPE has performed well recently, but I increasingly feel that 'the more expensive HYPE becomes, the more detrimental it is to Hyperliquid'. The reason is that Hyperliquid's most imaginative narrative was building a multi-asset trading ecosystem around HIP-3. However, now trade.xyz dominates the HIP-3 project, while Felix, Ventuals have shut down one after another... The excessively high HYPE price has in fact become an obstacle to the expansion of the HIP-3 blueprint (building a custom market based on HIP-3 has a 500k HYPE staking requirement, which translates to over $35 million at the current price). The market's previous vision was 'Hyperliquid + countless custom markets', but the current situation is 'Hyperliquid + trade.xyz'. If the upper-layer market solidifies with only trade.xyz, it obviously doesn't align with the market's previous expectations in terms of user reach and imaginative prospects.

Suzz (@aidongshoupai)

Introduction: Just sold SK Hynix too early.

Sharing: The market is never short of opportunities, but it is always scarce in calm capital and mindset. The capital market is perpetually flowing; market trends won't end just because you miss one opportunity. The short-term moonshot you missed today, the hot sector you missed, the bottom-fishing opportunity you missed, are all just minuscule among the countless opportunities in the market. The market operates day after day, with old and new themes alternating, and boom-bust cycles repeating. Missing this bus, the next opportunity will arrive soon. Investing doesn't require catching every single market move; we only need to grasp opportunities within our cognitive scope and with controllable risks. Obsessing over missed opportunities and being trapped by anxiety is the biggest pitfall in investing. Instead of internalizing FOMO (fear of missing out), it's better to settle down, improve your cognition, and wait for the next timing that belongs to you.

Additionally, reviewing past trading history, I discovered a very interesting phenomenon: When we look back from a post-hoc perspective, we can easily find that there were excellent opportunities everywhere. Looking back at the market from last year, last month, even a few weeks ago, we can always clearly see which assets were at lows, which sectors were about to explode, which trends deserved heavy positions, as if there were easily attainable profit opportunities everywhere.

But this falls into 'hindsight bias', always seeing the market clearly in retrospect, yet feeling lost in the present. Actually, this phenomenon precisely confirms a core truth: History is full of opportunities, and the present is never short of them either. Past opportunities never disappeared; it's just that our cognitive ability was insufficient, our mindset was浮躁, preventing us from recognizing or daring to seize them. Similarly, the market at this very moment still contains countless investment opportunities at different levels and with varying risk grades.

golem(@web3_golem)

Introduction: Golem's whimsical thoughts.

Sharing: On June 16, SpaceX announced the acquisition of Anysphere, the parent company of AI programming tool Cursor, for $60 billion. This acquisition is essentially a case of mutual need. Musk needs Cursor's developer data to train his AI model Grok, while Anysphere needs the massive computing power behind SpaceX to support training its own AI model Composer to compete against its former partner Anthropic's models.

But beyond the strategic significance for both parties, a detail easily overlooked in this acquisition is its impact on SpaceX's stock price, because Musk didn't actually spend a single penny—the funds for acquiring Cursor were entirely paid using SpaceX's Class A common stock.

According to SEC filing documents, SpaceX implemented the merger with Anysphere through its wholly-owned subsidiary X67 Inc. X67 Inc. will merge into Anysphere, with Cursor as the surviving entity becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of SpaceX. Upon completion of the merger, all common and preferred stock of Anysphere will be converted into SpaceX Class A common stock, with the exchange ratio calculated based on the volume-weighted average price over the 7 consecutive trading days prior to closing.

Clearly, in this acquisition, Musk got the better deal. Paying with SpaceX stock allows Musk to leverage the company's currently extremely high market valuation to complete the acquisition by giving up relatively little equity. Therefore, the actual cost of the acquisition is much lower; most of what was given was bubble...

So, here's the key point: As of June 16 when the merger agreement was signed, only 3 trading days had passed since SpaceX's IPO. Therefore, the earliest stock transfer will occur next week. To acquire Cursor more cheaply and with less equity given up, will the 'Musk interest group' proactively stabilize SpaceX's trading volume and keep its market cap at a high level?

Of course, there's no strong causal relationship between these two, it's just an analytical speculation regarding factors affecting SPCX's stock price.

SPCX's current price is mainly driven by market sentiment. According to Vanda Track's recent data, SpaceX remains the individual stock most favored by retail investor funds in the US, topping the list of net retail inflows for multiple consecutive days. However, retail enthusiasm is bound to wane; 'faith' does have its price. By then, institutions will need to take over as the main force stabilizing the SPCX price.

Wenser(@wenser2010)

Introduction: Tea-serving junior, crypto酱油党 (casual observer), media observer.

Sharing: 1. BTC had a small rebound, US-Iran tensions eased, still bullish for now, will consider testing short positions around 68k-69k;

2. SpaceX IPO concluded, but didn't close above a $2.2 trillion market cap on the first day, angrily lost $10, but looking above $250 after entering the Nasdaq in July;

3. Small-scale testing in World Cup betting ongoing. Many upsets or draws in the first two days of group stage, especially Spain vs Cape Verde 0:0 probably made many jump. Win rates for strong teams have picked up these past two days. Currently看好 France, Argentina, Germany, Norway, can focus on these later.

4. Japanese and Korean stock markets continue to surge higher, the trend of the strong getting stronger remains evident. The next landmark events now are the Fed rate hike or the Anthropic/OpenAI IPO. Personally, I believe Anthropic has the potential to be another historically largest IPO after SpaceX, with market cap potentially rising to the $2-3 trillion scale. Saw a post shared by a group friend these past two days saying 'The AI industry, like the real estate industry, is a capital-intensive industry', which felt very insightful. Therefore,布局 (positioning in) picks-and-shovels plays for defensive investment is a good strategy.

Qin Xiaofeng(@QinXiaofeng888)

Introduction: Options enthusiast, Meme bag holder.

Sharing: Regarding operations, bought the dip on HYPE around $56 last week to go long, gradually sold after it reached $70. Selling doesn't mean I'm not bullish, just that I think a major breakthrough is difficult in the short term. However, long-term, the $50~60 range will become an important support zone. Plan to continue buying at this level for two reasons: First, in this wave of traditional asset tokenization trading, Hyperliquid has basically captured the biggest红利 (dividends), with transaction fees持续飙升 (continuously soaring) and HYPE buybacks剧增 (dramatically increasing). The average monthly buyback over the past six months exceeded $60 million. It needs to be clarified that 97-99% of Hyperliquid platform's transaction fee revenue is directly used to repurchase HYPE in the open market. Currently, no other exchange does this, and this is the biggest growth flywheel. The second reason is, since the HYPE现货 ETF (spot ETF)上市 (listed), cumulative net inflows reached $180 million, with日均 (daily average) net inflows of $7.5 million. Traditional capital's favor for HYPE is obvious, a待遇 (treatment) not seen with other crypto ETFs after listing.

Regarding ETH, the market now presents a very bizarre situation. Pure crypto investors are utterly失望透顶 (disappointed) with ETH—because its price performance has been very拉胯 (lacking) over the past few years, leading to lost opportunity cost; traditional investors, especially Wall Street figures represented by Tom Lee, are反而 (instead)持续加码 (continuously increasing positions) in ETH with real money, believing it's an undervalued 'Amazon'. Neither side can convince the other, so let time tell. Personally, I think ETH has really跌到了 (fallen to) '白菜价' (dirt-cheap price). Getting on board now costs less than Bitmine.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main concerns Azuma raises about the high price of HYPE in relation to Hyperliquid's HIP-3 ecosystem?

AAzuma argues that the high price of HYPE is becoming detrimental to Hyperliquid's HIP-3 ecosystem expansion. A core requirement to build a custom market on HIP-3 is staking 500,000 HYPE, which currently costs over $35 million. This prohibitive cost has led to the shutdown of projects like Felix and Ventuals, leaving trade.xyz as the dominant, and potentially sole, player. This concentration contradicts the initial vision of 'Hyperliquid + countless custom markets' and reduces the platform's user reach and future potential.

QAccording to Suzz, what is a major pitfall for investors, and what mindset should they adopt instead?

ASuzz identifies the obsession with missed opportunities and the resulting anxiety as a major trap for investors. He advises against this 'hindsight bias,' where past opportunities seem obvious. Instead, investors should remain calm and understand that the market is perpetual, with new opportunities constantly emerging. The key is to focus on improving one's own cognition and discipline, waiting for opportunities that fall within one's own understanding and risk tolerance, rather than chasing every trend.

QWhat theory does golem propose regarding the impact of SpaceX's stock-for-stock acquisition of Cursor on its share price (SPCX)?

AGolem suggests that 'Musk's interest group' might have an incentive to actively maintain SpaceX's trading volume and market capitalization at high levels before the deal's final share exchange. Since the acquisition was paid entirely with SpaceX A-class common stock, and the exchange ratio is based on the average price from the 7 trading days before closing, a higher stock price allows Musk to acquire Cursor by giving up a smaller percentage of SpaceX equity. Therefore, stabilizing the price could make the acquisition cheaper for SpaceX.

QWhat are the two main reasons cited by Qin Xiaofeng for considering HYPE a long-term buy in the $50-$60 range?

AQin Xiaofeng provides two reasons: 1) Fundamental Growth: Hyperliquid has captured the lion's share of the traditional asset on-chain trading trend, leading to soaring transaction fees. Crucially, 97-99% of the platform's fee revenue is used to buy back HYPE from the open market, creating a powerful growth flywheel. 2) Institutional Demand: Since its ETF listing, the HYPE ETF has seen a net inflow of $180 million, averaging $7.5 million daily. This strong and sustained interest from traditional finance is a unique advantage not seen with other crypto ETFs.

QHow does Wenser describe the current market sentiment divide regarding ETH (Ethereum)?

AWenser describes a stark divide in ETH sentiment. On one side, pure crypto investors are deeply disappointed with ETH due to its poor price performance in recent years, which has led to significant opportunity cost. On the other side, traditional investors, exemplified by figures like Tom Lee from Wall Street, are actively buying ETH, viewing it as an undervalued asset akin to 'Amazon.' Both sides hold firm in their opposing views, leaving the outcome to be determined by time.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

Gate Research Institute: Chart Pattern Analysis and Breakout Trading Strategies Chart patterns are crucial tools in technical analysis for observing market supply and demand shifts, trend continuations, and reversals. This analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of trend, volume, support/resistance, time cycles, and breakout validity, not just rote pattern recognition. Patterns are broadly categorized into reversal patterns (e.g., Double Tops/Bottoms, Head and Shoulders) and continuation patterns (e.g., Flags, Triangles, Rectangles). An effective breakout, key for trading, requires clear support/resistance, prolonged consolidation, a prevailing trend backdrop, and volume confirmation. However, breakouts are not guaranteed, as false breakouts are common. Risk must be managed through position sizing, stop-loss orders, pullback confirmations, and profit-taking in stages. Key pattern types discussed include: * **Rectangle Patterns:** Indicate market indecision within parallel support and resistance, with breakouts projecting a move equal to the pattern's width. * **Flag & Pennant Patterns:** Short-term continuation patterns following sharp price moves ("flagpoles"). * **Triangle Patterns:** Symmetrical, Ascending (bullish bias), and Descending (bearish bias) triangles, representing consolidation before a directional move. * **Head and Shoulders Patterns:** Major reversal patterns signaling trend exhaustion. The article details breakout trading strategies, defining valid breakouts by price closing beyond a key level with increased volume and minimal immediate re-entry into the prior range. It contrasts range trading with breakout trading and outlines entry methods (immediate entry, pullback entry, scaling in), stop-loss placement (based on pattern failure), and profit-taking techniques (target-based, structure-based, trend-following). It further classifies breakout outcomes: 1. **Valid Breakouts:** Strong, sustained moves in the breakout direction. 2. **Pullback Breakouts:** Price breaks out, retests the breakout level as support/resistance, then resumes the trend—offering a lower-risk entry. 3. **False Breakouts:** Price briefly breaches a level but quickly reverses back into the prior range, a common risk managed by strict stop-losses. Key validation tools for breakouts include volume analysis, the principle of support/resistance role reversal, and momentum indicators like ATR, Moving Averages, Bollinger Bands, and RSI. In conclusion, while chart patterns and breakout analysis provide a structured framework, their effectiveness relies on multiple confirming factors—trend context, volume, and proper risk management. They should be integrated into a broader trading system rather than used as standalone signals.

marsbitHá 12m

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

marsbitHá 12m

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

In a speech titled "The Industrialization of Trust," Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom (former BlackRock digital assets head) discussed the future transformation of global finance. Drawing from 20 years at BlackRock, where he led the launch of Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and tokenized funds, Chalom highlighted the immense hidden costs of establishing trust in traditional finance—estimated at over $9.3 trillion annually in the US alone due to fragmented systems, multi-day settlements, and countless reconciliations. He argued that Ethereum is emerging as the global financial "settlement layer for trust," with its robust, decentralized infrastructure securing over $300 billion in on-chain assets and most stablecoins and tokenized assets. The future, he stated, will be driven by three accelerating pillars: stablecoins (evolving beyond crypto gateways to become efficient cross-border payment rails), tokenized assets (enabling 24/7 trading and reshaping capital markets), and DeFi (providing automated, accessible financial services). A potential game-changer, Chalom added, is the fourth pillar: "Agentic Finance," where AI agents autonomously execute programmable financial transactions via smart contracts and stablecoins. He envisions individuals soon having AI-powered "CFOs in their pockets" to optimize idle capital and manage tokenized portfolios. This shift, facilitated by Ethereum's trustless settlement, could multiply on-chain transaction volume 1000x within a year, moving finance toward a seamless, digitized future.

marsbitHá 12m

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

marsbitHá 12m

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbitHá 23m

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbitHá 23m

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight NewsHá 43m

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight NewsHá 43m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片