US Senate reminds of unresolved conflict of interest of Trump in crypto

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-20Última atualização em 2026-08-20

Resumo

A US senator has highlighted an unresolved conflict of interest concerning former President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency dealings as a remaining obstacle to passing the key market bill, the CLARITY Act. Senator Ruben Gallego, a key negotiator, stated that multiple ethics provision proposals were sent to Trump without effective response. At a White House event on August 19th, Trump urged Congress to pass the bill, after which Bitcoin's price rose to $70,000. Concerns center on Trump's expanding crypto interests, including the TRUMP memecoin and his family's World Liberty Financial project, with reports showing nearly $1.5 billion in crypto earnings. Although Trump agreed in July to a ban on federal officials issuing or funding crypto assets, Democrats criticized its enforcement mechanism. A key procedural Senate vote is scheduled for September 15th, requiring 60 votes. Gallego stated that passing "smart ethics legislation" and resolving issues like stablecoin yield regulation and anti-illegal activity measures are necessary for the bill's advancement.

The US Senate has reminded that one of the obstacles to the adoption of the key local crypto market bill, the CLARITY Act, remains the conflict of interest of US President Donald Trump concerning his crypto business. Senator Democrat Ruben Gallego, a key participant in the negotiations on the bill, pointed out that several versions of the ethics provision have been sent to Trump, but to no avail, reports The Block.

"We sent proposals to the White House again and again, but we either received no response or a response after a long delay," said Gallego.

On Wednesday, August 19, at an event at the White House, where heads of departments and large crypto companies were invited, Trump stated that Congress needs to "take the next step" by approving the CLARITY Act, which has been postponed until autumn. Against the background of his statements, the Bitcoin rate rose to $70 thousand, updating the maximum since the beginning of summer.

The expansion of Trump's business interests in the crypto industry and the growth of income from them raise concerns among some congressmen. The focus has been on the meme coin Trump Official Trump (TRUMP) and the crypto project of his family, World Liberty Financial. According to financial statements published in June, Trump earned almost $1.5 billion from crypto.

In July, Trump agreed to a ban for civil servants on issuing and financing crypto assets. The text of the provision states that its enforcement will be carried out by the Department of Justice, and the provision itself will be in effect until 2029.

This formulation drew criticism from Democrats who said it was insufficient. The latest version suggests that these rules will be enforced by state attorneys general.

A preliminary procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the Senate is scheduled for September 15. To pass this procedure, the bill needs to receive 60 votes.

According to Gallego, for this to happen, "it is necessary to adopt competent legislation in the field of ethics, as well as resolve some unresolved issues." Among them are the regulation of stablecoin yields and concerns that the bill is not effective enough in combating illegal activities.

"There are certain political forces that would prefer not to let this issue become a political problem both from the left and from the right. There are also those who want to govern the country, want to 'land this plane' and continue to implement innovations in the world," said Gallego.

end-content

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main obstacle mentioned in the article regarding the passage of the CLARITY Act?

AThe main obstacle is the unresolved conflict of interest concerning US President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency business. Senator Ruben Gallego noted that several ethics provision proposals were sent to the White House but were either ignored or met with significant delays.

QAccording to the article, what was the market reaction to Trump's statements at the White House event on August 19?

AFollowing Trump's statements at the White House event urging Congress to approve the CLARITY Act, the price of Bitcoin rose to $70,000, reaching its highest level since the beginning of the summer.

QWhich specific Trump-related crypto assets have drawn the attention and concern of some members of Congress?

AThe crypto assets that have drawn concern are the Trump memecoin called Official Trump (TRUMP) and the Trump family's crypto project, World Liberty Financial. A financial report in June indicated Trump earned nearly $1.5 billion from crypto.

QWhat changes does the latest version of the ethics provision propose regarding enforcement, and why is this criticized?

AThe latest version of the ethics provision proposes that enforcement of the rules would be handled by state attorneys general. Democrats have criticized previous versions as insufficient, particularly a July agreement where enforcement was assigned to the Department of Justice.

QWhat are the two unresolved issues mentioned by Senator Gallego that need to be addressed for the CLARITY Act to pass the procedural vote?

ASenator Gallego stated that two unresolved issues are the regulation of stablecoin yield and concerns that the bill is not effective enough in combating illicit activity. He also emphasized the need for sound ethics legislation.

Leituras Relacionadas

Institutions Have Already Bought the Dip: Is Bitcoin at $70,000 the Start of a Bull Run or a Local Top?

Institutional Investors Piled into Bitcoin Ahead of Rally: Is $70K a New Bull Market Start or Local Top? Bitcoin surged past $70,000 following pro-crypto remarks from former U.S. President Donald Trump on August 20. However, institutional investors had been accumulating exposure in Q2 2026, even as the price fell. 13F filings reveal that while total Bitcoin ETF holdings declined, institutional holdings increased by 7.5%, reaching a record 44.2% share of ETF assets. Key institutional moves include Jane Street increasing its Bitcoin ETF and MicroStrategy (MSTR) exposure by over $800 million, BlackRock adding ~$290 million in Bitcoin-related holdings (MSTR, its own IBIT ETF, and ASST), and JPMorgan boosting its IBIT position by $85.6 million. UBS significantly increased its call option exposure on IBIT. Notably, Paul Tudor Jones's fund reversed a multi-quarter selling trend to add IBIT shares. Market opinions are divided post-rally. The "bear market over" camp includes F2Pool's co-founder declaring the bear market ended, Strive's CEO citing a favorable macro backdrop for Bitcoin, and Standard Chartered targeting $100,000 by year-end. Conversely, the "not yet bottomed" camp includes CZ stating the super cycle hasn't arrived, CryptoQuant analysts warning of elevated retail demand often preceding local tops, and analysis from VanEck and Glassnode suggesting on-chain data shows a prolonged "capitulation phase" is still unfolding, indicating current price strength may be a relief rally rather than a definitive trend reversal.

Odaily星球日报Há 14m

Institutions Have Already Bought the Dip: Is Bitcoin at $70,000 the Start of a Bull Run or a Local Top?

Odaily星球日报Há 14m

Viewpoint: A $4 Billion Buyback Can Fix Liquidity, But Not U.S. Fiscal Health

On August 19, the U.S. Treasury announced it would increase its maximum single-operation buyback size for long-term bonds from $2 billion to at least $4 billion, aiming to improve market liquidity. This move initially led to a pullback in long-term yields, such as the 30-year Treasury yield which had recently hit a 2007 high near 5.34%, sparking talk of potential "Treasury support." However, an opposing perspective argues this is merely a temporary fix. While buybacks can enhance trading conditions for older, less-liquid bonds, they do not address the underlying fiscal pressures. The Treasury's actions are a form of debt management, not monetary stimulus like QE; the funds used for buybacks ultimately come from cash balances or new borrowing. They do not reduce the government's overall financing needs. The core issue is growing fiscal supply. With the federal deficit reaching a record $432 billion in July 2026 and cumulative deficits already surpassing the prior fiscal year's total, the market faces a massive wave of new debt issuance. The recent surge in long-term yields may reflect a repricing of this persistent fiscal risk and the associated term premium, rather than just a liquidity shortage. Furthermore, demand-side challenges loom. Foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries have recently declined, and if official demand weakens, the market will rely more on price-sensitive private investors, potentially requiring higher yields to clear future auctions. In essence, the Treasury can use buybacks to soothe market "trading problems," but it cannot buy away the nation's "fiscal problem." The key factors to watch will be the appetite at long-term bond auctions, the trajectory of the fiscal deficit, and whether higher yields can sustainably attract buyers. Without improvement in these areas, the yield relief provided by the $4 billion buyback expansion is likely just a short-term buffer.

marsbitHá 23m

Viewpoint: A $4 Billion Buyback Can Fix Liquidity, But Not U.S. Fiscal Health

marsbitHá 23m

Trading

Spot
活动图片