2026-04-18 Sábado

Centro de Notícias - Página 823

Obtém notícias cripto em tempo real e tendências de mercado com o Centro de Notícias da HTX.

Solana Users Beware: Your SOL Is Being Quietly Harvested in These Ways

A recent article titled "Payment for Order Flow on Solana" has exposed exploitative practices in Solana’s fee market, drawing widespread attention. Similar to traditional finance PFOF models—like Robinhood’s zero-commission trading—Solana applications are leveraging information asymmetry to extract hidden fees from users. Front-end apps and wallets control transaction routing, execution, and fee structures, creating multiple avenues for rent-seeking. These include selling user order flow to market makers, enabling toxic MEV strategies like sandwich attacks, and inflating priority fees and tips. Users—especially retail—are often overcharged due to fear of transaction failure, even when the network isn’t congested. Data shows significant fee disparities: for instance, Axiom users pay median priority fees 200x higher than those paid by high-frequency traders. Much of these excess fees are believed to be captured by the applications themselves, often through kickback arrangements with landing services like Jito. To address these issues, Solana is proposing protocol-level upgrades such as Multiple Concurrent Proposers (MCP) to reduce monopolistic control, Priority Ordering to ensure fair transaction ordering, and a Dynamic Base Fee mechanism to return fee pricing power to the protocol and users. These changes aim to create a more transparent and equitable market structure, essential for Solana’s long-term growth and credibility.

marsbit01/07 06:05

Solana Users Beware: Your SOL Is Being Quietly Harvested in These Ways

marsbit01/07 06:05

USDD 2025 Annual Review: Aiming for Billions, Sustained Growth, and Maturing Ecosystem

USDD 2025 Year in Review: Aiming for Billions with Sustained Growth and Maturing Ecosystem The year 2025 was pivotal for the decentralized stablecoin USDD, marked by key breakthroughs and stable development. Following its upgrade to USDD 2.0 in January, it achieved record highs across user growth, TVL, product iteration, and system stability. Its multi-chain deployment and DeFi integration strategy proved successful, solidifying its role as a foundational Web3 infrastructure. Core metrics saw significant growth. The Total Value Locked (TVL) surpassed $900 million, and the supply exceeded 860 million tokens, placing USDD among the top ten stablecoins. Its yield-bearing version, sUSDD, grew to nearly $100 million in TVL. The protocol distributed approximately $20 million in interest to users and expanded its holder base to 459,000 addresses. Ecologically, USDD expanded its reach by natively deploying on Ethereum and BNB Chain, in addition to TRON. This multi-chain presence enabled integration with over 20 major exchanges, wallets, and DeFi protocols, including a key partnership with the Binance Wallet. Throughout a year of high market volatility, USDD maintained its strict 1:1 dollar peg, aided by its over-collateralization mechanism, transparent reserves, and diversified yield model from the Smart Allocator. It passed five security audits, receiving recognition for its high safety standards. Looking ahead to 2026, USDD plans to transition from incentive-driven growth to being driven by real-world usage. Key focuses include deepening DeFi integrations, expanding exchange and wallet partnerships, reducing reliance on external subsidies, and optimizing its yield model for sustainable, long-term stability.

marsbit01/07 05:46

USDD 2025 Annual Review: Aiming for Billions, Sustained Growth, and Maturing Ecosystem

marsbit01/07 05:46

Polymarket Settlement Disputes Intensify, Ethereum Technical Plans Questioned: What Is the Overseas Crypto Community Discussing Today?

In the past 24 hours, the crypto community focused on several key issues. Polymarket faced significant backlash over its settlement of a prediction market related to the U.S. military action in Venezuela, which was deemed not an "invasion," sparking accusations of arbitrary rule changes and concerns over its oracle-based resolution system. Suspected insider trading emerged, as large bets were placed just hours before the event, leading to calls for restrictions on government officials using prediction markets. Berachain’s TVL plummeted over 90%, attributed to fading hype and lack of sustainable product demand. TON also saw price declines, partly linked to alleged team token sales. On the ecosystem front, Solana’s network health was questioned due to validators delaying transactions to maximize MEV extraction, threatening its real-time processing advantage. Ethereum faced internal debate over its roadmap, with critics arguing it prioritizes minimal trust over practical utility, while technical progress was noted with EIP-7805 for enhanced censorship resistance. Lighter introduced a fee-based buyback mechanism for its token, viewed positively for value capture, while Perp DEX market makers saw compressed margins. Other updates included Infinex’s burn rate clarification, Tempo’s new token standard, and MegaETH’s Coinbase listing speculation.

marsbit01/07 05:06

Polymarket Settlement Disputes Intensify, Ethereum Technical Plans Questioned: What Is the Overseas Crypto Community Discussing Today?

marsbit01/07 05:06

IOSG Ventures: A Game with No Winners, How to Break the Deadlock in the Altcoin Market?

The article "IOSG Ventures: A No-Winner Game, How to Break the Dilemma of the Altcoin Market?" analyzes the current crisis in the altcoin market, attributing it to flawed token issuance practices from the 2021-2022 funding bubble. A key issue is the "low float trap," where tokens are launched with minimal circulating supply to artificially maintain high fully diluted valuations (FDV), creating a lose-lose situation for exchanges, token holders, projects, and VCs. The market's responses, including meme coins and MetaDAOs, have failed, leading to rampant speculation or excessive control that alienates talent and exchanges. The author proposes a rebalancing act: Exchanges should shift from arbitrary lockups to KPI-based vesting. Holders should demand transparency and control over major decisions, not micromanagement. Projects should only issue tokens with clear utility and product-market fit. VCs must be more rigorous and stop forcing token launches on every project. The next 12 months are expected to bring a final wave of supply shock from past VC investments. However, the author remains optimistic, believing tokens offer unique mechanisms for growth and community building that equity cannot. The market shows self-correcting signs, with stricter exchange listings and evolving investor protections. The long-term threat is a "lemon market" where only failing projects issue tokens, but this can be avoided if the industry adopts better standards and selective, value-add token launches.

marsbit01/07 03:37

IOSG Ventures: A Game with No Winners, How to Break the Deadlock in the Altcoin Market?

marsbit01/07 03:37

活动图片