2026-04-17 Sexta

Centro de Notícias - Página 765

Obtém notícias cripto em tempo real e tendências de mercado com o Centro de Notícias da HTX.

Why is Ethereum Urgently Needing ZK-ification?

The article discusses the urgent need for Ethereum to adopt zero-knowledge (ZK) technology as a core narrative for its future development. While Ethereum previously focused on ICOs, DeFi, and being a global financial settlement layer, it now lacks a compelling new narrative. ZK technology is highlighted as a critical solution, with Ethereum being the blockchain most invested in its development. ZK-EVM has reached the Alpha stage, a milestone celebrated by Vitalik Buterin. The primary motivation for ZK integration is to maintain Ethereum’s decentralization while improving scalability. Currently, increasing the Gas limit boosts TPS but raises node operation costs, potentially centralizing the network. ZK proofs allow nodes to verify transactions efficiently without expensive hardware upgrades, similar to automated exam grading versus manual checking. ZK itself doesn’t directly increase TPS but enables future Gas limit hikes with minimal node cost increases. The recent Fusaka upgrade, including PeerDAS, advances this goal. A ZK-powered Ethereum could achieve over 1000 TPS, strengthening its narrative. The article also addresses the role of third-party ZK teams (e.g., Polygon, Scroll, ZKsync, Taiko), which remain crucial for innovation and testing different ZK-EVM types (Type 1 to 4). ZK-VMs, like Brevis, are noted for higher performance and diversity, as they aren’t constrained by EVM compatibility. While ZK L1 may attract some L2 users, it also benefits L2s by reducing costs and improving foundational infrastructure. In summary, Ethereum’s ZK transformation, after years of development, is entering a critical phase, driven by collaborative efforts between Ethereum and external ZK projects.

marsbit01/13 00:37

Why is Ethereum Urgently Needing ZK-ification?

marsbit01/13 00:37

BSC Pop-up Store Style Memes: How Can They Compete with Solana?

The crypto market's high-beta phase has reignited the meme coin frenzy, with Solana and Binance Smart Chain (BSC) emerging as two dominant but divergent ecosystems. Solana leverages its high-speed, low-cost infrastructure (0.4s transaction time, ~$0.005 fees) and culture-first approach, epitomized by platforms like pump.fun, where memes evolve from community-driven narratives and often face rapid failure—over 98% of projects eventually collapse. Its top meme tokens, like BONK and WIF, thrive on viral momentum and decentralized innovation, but the ecosystem is highly competitive and transient. BSC, in contrast, relies heavily on central figures like CZ and He Yi, and its EVM compatibility attracts event-driven, sentiment-heavy trading—particularly within Chinese-speaking communities. While BSC memes can achieve rapid, concentrated pumps, they often lack longevity without ongoing influencer support. Data from Dexscreener (as of Jan 12, 2026) highlights key differences: Solana recorded 26.92M transactions ($8.65B volume) vs. BSC’s 5.9M ($7.80B), reflecting Solana’s retail-heavy, high-frequency trading versus BSC’s大户-dominated, narrative-centric rallies. Ultimately, Solana’s strength lies in its resilient, tool-rich culture, while BSC excels in short-term, liquidity-injected opportunities. The choice between chains depends on risk appetite: probability and algorithms on Solana, versus community sentiment and timing on BSC.

比推01/13 00:34

BSC Pop-up Store Style Memes: How Can They Compete with Solana?

比推01/13 00:34

活动图片