$30 billion leaves crypto market in 24 hours as Ethereum's Merge fails to ignite the rally

FinboldPublicado em 2022-09-16Última atualização em 2022-09-16

Resumo

The cryptocurrency market is still reacting to the historic Ethereum (ETH) Merge event that transitioned the blockchain to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) status.

$30 billion leaves crypto market in 24 hours as Ethereum's Merge fails to ignite the rally

The cryptocurrency market is still reacting to the historic Ethereum (ETH) Merge event that transitioned the blockchain to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) status. Despite the event being touted as bullish, 24 hours later, the crypto market is recording capital outflows outweighed by other factors like skyrocketing inflation. 
Indeed, as of September 16, the global crypto market capitalization stood at $958.83 billion, a drop of about 3.2% or $32.24 billion from the  $991.07 billion recorded on September 15.

One day global crypto market capitalization chart. Source: CoinMarketCap Before the Merge, a section of the crypto market had projected that the event would likely send Ethereum’s price skyrocketing. However, none of the projections have so far come true 24 hours later, with ETH trading at $1,400 by press time, a drop of almost 10% over the period. 
Ethereum 1-day price chart. Source: CoinMarketCap Similarly, Bitcoin (BTC) is trading in the red, dropping below the physiological $20,000 level. By press time, the crypto was valued at $19,700.
Impact of the Merge
Although the Merge appears not to have any short-term positive Iimpact on the general cryptocurrency market, the sector will need another bullish narrative to trigger a future rally. 
With the Merge turning out successful, the bulls appear overpowered, a factor that potentially indicates that the upgrade was a “buy the rumor, sell the news” event. 
This scenario is partly highlighted by a previous Finbold report that indicated that Ethereum inflows to exchanges started rising on September 12, amounting to about 700,000 ETH, before growing to about 1.7 million ETH on September 14. 
At the same time, Ethereum’s social dominance also surged before the upgrade. In particular, on September 13, the asset’s social dominance stood at 14.79% after climbing +23.19% in only one month.
Similarly, Meltem Demirors, the chief strategy officer of crypto asset management company CoinShares, pointed out that macro environment factors will potentially deter new capital from entering Ethereum while referring to the update as a ‘buy the rumor, sell the news event.’ 
All eyes on the FED 
At the same time, the sell-off appears to stem from general macroeconomic factors, with surging inflation the main trigger. Following the recent inflation figures, there are expectations that the Federal Reserve will likely hike interest rates to contain the situation. 
Therefore, the next FED meeting is considered a key indicator for the market course, as highlighted by crypto trading expert Michaël van de Poppe. 
Seems clear to me; waiting until next FED meeting and probably until then markets will be down, pricing in the worst and 100bps.
— Michaël van de Poppe (@CryptoMichNL) September 15, 2022
All in all, it is worth noting that crypto analysts have maintained that the Merge will have a long-term bullish impact on the general crypto space. 

Leituras Relacionadas

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbitHá 1h

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbitHá 1h

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHá 4h

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHá 4h

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHá 4h

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片