Serum (SRM) Price Looks Set After Hibernation, Can Price Go To $1?

newsbtcPublicado em 2022-09-09Última atualização em 2022-09-09

Resumo

Serum (SRM) has struggled against tether (USDT) in recent weeks.

Serum (SRM) has struggled against tether (USDT) in recent weeks, rising above $0.8 as the price of Serum (SRM) remains range-bound. For weeks, the price of Bitcoin (BTC) fluctuated between $19,500 and $20,000, with the price stalling on the next movement. Most altcoins, including Serum, have been affected by this choppy movement (SRM). (Source: Binance)
Serum (SRM) Price Analysis On The Weekly Chart
The price of SRM has had difficulty replicating its recent bullish move, which saw the price rally to $3.5 as the price rallied with a good bullish sentiment.
SRM has struggled to stay afloat after falling from an all-time high of $13, as the price continues to fall with no sign of a major bounce. With the current indicators, SRM could be poised to rally from its weekly low of $0.8 to around $1.2.
The price of SRM is encountering resistance at $1; if the price of SRM flips this region, we may see the price rise to new heights.
If the price of SRM maintains this bullish structure, we could see the price of SRM breaking off of its first resistance at $1 with more buy volumes.
Weekly resistance for the price of SRM – $1.
Weekly support for the price of SRM – $0.75.
Price Analysis Of SRM On The Daily (1D) Chart

Daily SRM Price Chart | Source: SRMUSDT On Tradingview.com After rallying from its daily low, the price of SRM was rejected and is struggling to break out in a range channel. A break above this bullish channel on the daily timeframe will confirm its bullish strength to trend higher.
The price of SRM has since struggled to regain the bullish pattern as it trades below the 50 and 200 Exponential Moving Averages (EMA) daily. The prices at $0.9 and $1.6 correspond to the 50 and 200 EMA acting as resistance to the SRM price.
Daily resistance for the SRM price – $0.9.
Daily support for the SRM price – $0.75.
SRM Price Analysis On The Four-Hourly (4H) Chart

Four-Hourly SRM Price Chart | Source: SRMUSDT On Tradingview.com In the 4H timeframe, the price of SRM remains bullish after forming a hidden bullish divergence, with the price bouncing off its downtrend line and rallying from $0.74 to $0.81.
The price of SRM is trading above the 50 EMA but below the 200 EMA. The price at the 50 EMA is $0.78 and acts as support, while the price at the 200 EMA is $0.85 and acts as resistance.
SRM must break above the 200 EMA with significant volume in order to have a chance of trending higher to a price of $1.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) for SRM is below 55 on the 4H chart, indicating a moderate buy order volume SRM price.
Four-Hourly resistance for the SRM price – $0.85.
Four-Hourly support for the SRM price – $0.75.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

Bitcoin has reached a critical juncture around the $60,000 level, which analysts view as a major technical and psychological support zone. According to a TradingView analysis, a successful hold above this demand area could pave the way for a recovery toward $81,000. However, the warning is clear: a decisive and sustained break below $60,000 would invalidate the bullish outlook, likely triggering stop losses and a deeper market correction. The current setup is described as a binary test—maintaining support keeps the recovery narrative alive, while losing it would signal a shift toward a more significant downturn.

bitcoinistHá 5m

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

bitcoinistHá 5m

Venus Protocol Integrates Tokenized Stocks As Lending Collateral On BNB Chain

Venus Protocol now allows tokenized stocks from companies like Apple, Tesla, and Microsoft to be used as borrowing collateral on BNB Chain. This integration brings a key real-world asset (RWA) use case into DeFi lending. Users can deposit these tokenized equities, which are described as 1:1 backed by real shares held by regulated custodians, into isolated pools to borrow stablecoins or BNB without selling their underlying positions. This move expands DeFi lending beyond crypto-native assets, resembling traditional margin finance. It highlights BNB Chain's competition for RWA activity and aims to attract more stable liquidity. However, tokenized stocks introduce different risks, including dependency on off-chain custodians and challenges with collateral valuation due to differing market hours between traditional and on-chain trading. While not an immediate price catalyst, this development is significant within broader crypto trends like compliance pressure and RWA tokenization. Success will depend on growing liquidity, reliable custody, robust price oracles, and clear rules for redemptions and liquidations.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Venus Protocol Integrates Tokenized Stocks As Lending Collateral On BNB Chain

bitcoinistHá 1h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHá 11h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHá 11h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 11h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 11h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 13h