TON Rebrands Native Token As Gram, Reviving Original White Paper Name

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-06-03Última atualização em 2026-06-03

Resumo

The native token of the Toncoin (TON) network is being rebranded to 'Gram,' reviving its original name from the project's first white paper. This change, announced by Telegram co-founder and CEO Pavel Durov, is the fourth step in his "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) initiative. The transition period is expected to take about three weeks, and a new logo has been previewed. The rebrand follows Telegram's official return to the ecosystem in May as its largest validator, after a six-year absence that began with a 2020 legal dispute with the SEC. Durov stated that the move "returns to our roots" and paves the way for future developments, with three more steps remaining in the MTONGA roadmap. At the time of the announcement, Gram was trading around $2.02.

Toncoin’s native token has rebranded to ‘Gram’ as part of the latest step in Pavel Durov’s “Make TON Great Again” roadmap.

Toncoin’s Native Token Is Now Called Gram

In a new post on Telegram, Pavel Durov has shared details related to a rebranding of the native token of the Toncoin network. The asset is set to see a name change to Gram, with the transition period expected to take about three weeks.

Durov is the co-founder and CEO of Telegram, and one of the biggest backers of TON. In the blockchain’s early days, its full form even stood for the Telegram Open Network, with the Telegram team handling its development. Telegram’s official involvement with the token, however, ended back in 2020 following a legal dispute with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

After Telegram pulled out, the ecosystem rebranded itself to The Open Network and development was handed off to independent contributors. While the messaging giant ended its involvement in the project, it didn’t break all ties. In 2023, Telegram integrated a wallet based on the blockchain to its official app.

Durov himself also remained a supporter of the project. This year, the Telegram CEO kickstarted the “Make TON Great Again” (MTONGA) initiative, which is going to have a total of seven steps. The first two steps of the roadmap went into action in April and provided upgrades to the network’s transaction speed and fees.

The third step, announced in early May, saw Telegram officially re-enter the picture after a six-year absence, replacing the TON Foundation as the driving force behind the ecosystem. The messaging company also became the network’s largest validator.

“Telegram becoming TON’s largest validator strengthens decentralization,” said Durov in an X post a day after announcing the move. “It lets other major players join the validator pool without centralizing the network — with Telegram as the counterbalance.”

Now, the Telegram co-founder has unveiled the rebrand to the name Gram as the fourth checkpoint in the MTONGA plan. This change, which only applies to the blockchain’s native token, will bring back the asset’s original name from its first white paper. The new website for the token provides a teaser of a fresh logo for the cryptocurrency.

The new logo and name for the cryptocurrency | Source: Gram.org

“We’re returning to our roots — and starting a new chapter,” noted the Telegram co-founder. “This rebranding will pave the way for what comes next.” There are three more steps left in the MTONGA roadmap, but it only remains to be seen what they will bring to the network.

Gram Price

At the time of writing, Gram is trading around $2.02, up over 5% in the last seven days.

The trend in the price of the coin over the last five days | Source: TONUSDT on TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new name of Toncoin's native token and why was it chosen?

AThe new name is 'Gram'. It was chosen to revive the asset's original name from its first white paper, marking a return to the project's roots.

QWho announced the rebranding of the native token and what initiative is it part of?

APavel Durov, co-founder and CEO of Telegram, announced the rebranding. It is the fourth checkpoint in his 'Make TON Great Again' (MTONGA) roadmap initiative.

QWhat was the full form of 'TON' originally, and what is its status with Telegram now?

AOriginally, TON stood for the 'Telegram Open Network'. Telegram officially re-entered the TON ecosystem in early May 2024, after a six-year absence, replacing the TON Foundation as the driving force and becoming its largest validator.

QWhat was the reason for Telegram's initial withdrawal from the TON project in 2020?

ATelegram withdrew from the TON project in 2020 following a legal dispute with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

QAccording to the article, what was the approximate price and weekly performance of Gram at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, Gram was trading around $2.02, up over 5% in the last seven days.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Hunter Becomes the Hunted: The Most Profitable MEV Bot Gets Hacked

A well-known and highly profitable Ethereum MEV Bot, Jaredfromsubway.eth, suffered a sophisticated on-chain attack this Saturday, losing over $7.5 million. Analysis by Blockaid and others reveals this was not a conventional phishing or smart contract exploit, but a targeted "counter-MEV honeypot attack." The attacker meticulously laid a trap over several weeks, deploying 66 fake token contracts and liquidity pools disguised as major assets like WETH and USDC. These pools created the illusion of arbitrage opportunities. The MEV Bot's automated system detected these signals, executed trades, and in the process, granted approval permissions to attacker-controlled contracts. These approvals were not revoked, creating a persistent vulnerability. The attacker then exploited this in a single transaction, draining the bot's ETH, USDC, and USDT holdings. Jaredfromsubway.eth is notorious as one of Ethereum's most active and profitable MEV Bots, primarily known for executing "sandwich attacks" to profit from transaction slippage. Estimates suggest it has earned tens of millions in MEV revenue. The incident highlights escalating crypto security threats, demonstrating that even top-tier automated "predators" are vulnerable to novel, logic-based attacks designed to exploit their own operational rules. Following the hack, an unverified X account impersonating Jaredfromsubway.eth emerged, falsely offering a bounty for the return of funds, prompting developer warnings for users to stay vigilant.

marsbitHá 32m

Hunter Becomes the Hunted: The Most Profitable MEV Bot Gets Hacked

The prominent Ethereum MEV bot address Jaredfromsubway.eth suffered a targeted on-chain attack, losing over $7.5 million. The incident was identified as a "counter-MEV honeypot attack," where the attacker deployed numerous fake token contracts and liquidity pools over several weeks, mimicking mainstream assets like WETH and USDC to create seemingly profitable arbitrage opportunities. The MEV bot, designed to automatically detect and execute such trades, interacted with the malicious setup. During the process, it granted approvals to attacker-controlled contracts, which were not promptly revoked. The attacker later exploited these persistent permissions in a single transaction, draining the bot's holdings of ETH, USDC, and USDT. Jaredfromsubway.eth is known as one of Ethereum's most active and profitable MEV bots, primarily executing "sandwich attacks" to extract value from user transactions. Its operations have been linked to a majority of such attacks on the network. This event highlights the evolving security threats in crypto, demonstrating that even sophisticated, rule-exploiting systems can become targets of carefully designed behavioral traps. Following the theft, an impersonator account on X falsely claimed to offer a bounty for the return of the funds, prompting warnings from developers.

Odaily星球日报Há 39m

Hunter Becomes the Hunted: The Most Profitable MEV Bot Gets Hacked

Odaily星球日报Há 39m

The Reality of Payments in Latin America Is Not What You Think

The payment landscape in Latin America is undergoing a fundamental shift, driven by on-the-ground realities that challenge common perceptions. Based on over 500 hours of field research across the region, key insights emerge. Firstly, QR code payments, like Brazil's Pix, are becoming the dominant payment method in most emerging markets, overtaking cards. However, these domestic instant payment systems lack international interoperability, creating a significant gap for cross-border users. Secondly, the narrative around crypto cards is often misunderstood; their primary volume comes from high-net-worth professionals using them for salary conversions (e.g., USDT to local currency via Pix), not retail micro-payments. Competition in payments is shifting from customer acquisition to controlling the settlement layer, leading fintechs to acquire banking licenses for efficiency. Thirdly, treating "Latin America" as a single market is a mistake. Countries like Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico have distinct economic realities, user segments, and regulatory approaches. Brazil alone has at least five distinct user segments with different financial flows. Overlooked markets like Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador (the "forgotten five") offer high remittance volumes with lower competitive density. Finally, regulation in Latin America is often ahead of the US, with clearer frameworks for digital assets and a pragmatic approach from regulators focused on safety rather than obstruction. The margin on stablecoin forex is rapidly compressing toward zero, meaning future winners will be those building value-added services on top of the infrastructure, not just the cheapest exchange.

marsbitHá 47m

The Reality of Payments in Latin America Is Not What You Think

marsbitHá 47m

Making Music in a Bear Market: The Survival Experiment of a Bitcoin Band

"Orange Pill Jam: A Bitcoin Band's Survival in the Bear Market" Orange Pill Jam is a musical group exploring themes of financial sovereignty and privacy, born from the Bitcoin community. Formed after singer Mermaid performed her song "Dollar Apocalypse" at a 2022 conference, the band creates music intended for both Bitcoin enthusiasts and general audiences. Their creative process involves Mermaid writing lyrics and melodies, which producer/multi-instrumentalist Michi then shapes with a precise, rhythm-focused approach, often demanding numerous retakes to achieve his unique standard of timing. Their songs, like "Cypherpunks' Manifesto" and "Fire of Freedom," tackle concepts of digital privacy, the pitfalls of "free" services, and personal sovereignty, influenced by experiences in places like El Salvador. Despite operating in a crypto bear market with a Copyleft model (offering music for free sharing/remixing and accepting optional Bitcoin donations), they face practical challenges. Their growth is slow on platforms like YouTube and Spotify, which aren't optimized for their niche content. The band also navigates the rise of AI-generated music. While acknowledging AI's efficiency for certain tasks, they believe human creativity occupies a unique space that algorithms cannot replicate—the ability to create new genres and capture intangible rhythmic feeling. For Orange Pill Jam, the core argument for both Bitcoin in a downturn and human artistry in the AI age lies in this irreplaceable, intentional, and imperfectly human creative process. Their project persists as an anti-algorithm experiment, valuing the unquantifiable impact of music over scalable metrics.

marsbitHá 53m

Making Music in a Bear Market: The Survival Experiment of a Bitcoin Band

marsbitHá 53m

Google's AI Talent Loss: A Stress Test or a Prelude to an 'Obituary'?

The departure of high-profile AI talent from Google, including transformer pioneer Noam Shazeer and AlphaFold's John Jumper, has sparked debate about the company's competitive position. However, this is less a sign of decline than a pressure test typical of the pre-IPO talent wars among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic. Google's true strength lies not just in models but in its unparalleled full-stack position: extensive AI research, proprietary infrastructure (TPU, Google Cloud), a massive user base across products (Search, YouTube, Android), and established enterprise relationships. It is simultaneously a competitor and a key infrastructure provider for rivals. While facing the innovator's dilemma inherent to protecting its core search business, Google is aggressively integrating AI across its ecosystem. The narrative shouldn't focus on individual departures but on Google's systemic advantages—its deep talent pool, integrated product strategy, and capacity to compete across every layer of the AI stack for the long term.

marsbitHá 59m

Google's AI Talent Loss: A Stress Test or a Prelude to an 'Obituary'?