What You Missed From EthCC 🇫🇷

BanklessPublicado em 2022-07-27Última atualização em 2022-07-27

Resumo

A quick review of the important content of the next EthCC5 conference.

EthCC happened last week in Paris.

There were free macaroons, tons of POAPs, and a sweltering heat wave (the organizers airdropped fans to all attendees).

There was a lot going on, but if you missed it, here’s a quick taste of what was going on.

Infrastructure

1. Ethereum is only 55% complete

Vitalik wrapped up the conference on the last day with some big-picture thoughts on the long-term future of Ethereum. The goal of Ethereum is to optimize for being a robustly secure foundational base, while the complex functionalities are left to the Layer-2, referred to as “functionality escape velocity”.

This requires a lot of rapid change in the short-term, which creates volatility for the market and general building, but the rate of change will slow down in the long run.

On how far towards completion Ethereum is:

"The difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum is that Bitcoiners consider Bitcoin to be 80% complete, but Ethereans consider Ethereum to be 40% complete… I'd say Ethereum would be 55% complete after The Merge, so we're getting close and are in the second half of this big, long vision."

2. Zk-Rollups are coming

On that note, DeFi is betting big on zk-rollup technology.

Polygon, along with zkSync and Scroll, announced the launch of zkEVM, a scaling solution that combines zk-rollups with EVM compatibility. This is huge and it shouldn’t be understated.

Zk-rollups are technically complex, and until now, it was difficult for developers to build on. With the launch of zkEVMs, developers can more easily launch smart contracts on this new, emerging technology.

3. DeFi UX needs to improve

While Layer-2s are scaling transaction speed, a whole host of other builders are working in tandem to scale the DeFi user experience in a world of multiple wallets, chains, and assets.

Co-founder of rhino.fi, Daniel Yanev, spoke on the importance of the DeFi user experience in a multi-chain world. DeFi is complicated to use because its plumbing is still undergoing rapid innovation and yet to reach the point where simplicity is its focus: “Users are not stupid, the user experiences were just bad”.

That places the onus on builders to simplify the decentralized finance experience into a one-stop platform, in particular DeFi aggregators like rhino.fi and deBridge, the latter of which launched a cross-chain composability feature at ETH CC.

For a nifty intro to the topic, Paraswap founder Mounir Benchemled takes the mainstage to talk about how aggregators are helping scaling the DeFi user experience.

DeFi

1. VeTokens get supercharged

The Curve wars inspired a new paradigm of “metagovernance” veTokenomics that made governance tokens valuable by letting users lock them up for boosted yield and governance power, but at the cost of sacrificing liquidity.

Stake DAO, a seminal player in the Curve wars announced this week Liquid Lockers, which lets users supercharge their veTokenomics by leveraging their veTokens for yield, SDT incentives, and governance voting power without the same restrictions.

The feature is live and currently caters to CRV, FXS, ANGLE and BAL.

2. Cosmos DeFi gains traction

It’s ETH CC but it’s not always about Ethereum. Cosmonauts, this one is for you.

Osmos co-founder Sunny Aggarwal explains why builders (i.e. dYdX) are finding interchain DeFi like Cosmos increasingly attractive, for reasons like customized fee parameters (e.g. being able to pay fees in any token, charging higher fees for different types of transactions), custom execution models (e.g. experimenting with different virtual machines, multi-asset shielded pools), self-executing code (e.g. batched AMMs), custom transaction ordering and more.

Sebastien Couture, founder of Interop Ventures, also made the bull case for the Cosmos interchain with a focus on many top players in the ecosystem like Osmosis, Evmo, Kava and more.

DAOs

1. The Regen opportunity is here

How do you create Web3 systems and projects that are anti-fragile to shock events?

Kevin Owocki takes the mainstage on this important question (see also Kevin’s last week published Bankless piece Front-running The Regen Opportunity).

2. RetroPGF takes center stage

Karl Floresch, CTO of Optimism gave a lively talk on retroactive public goods funding where he shared how Optimism vision aligns positive impact to Web3 broadly with a profit reward to the individual.

That way, the creation of public goods becomes profitable to create. 🌱

3 Likes

3. DAO governance is hard

Stablenode’s Doo Wan Nam talks about some of the biggest challenges and best practices in DAO governance, while Aragon DAO’s Head of Ecosystem Ivan Fartunov dives into how infrastructural tooling can make up for these shortfalls.

The unsexy truth about running a DAO is that you’re operating in a highly uncertain space with a whole bunch of risks.

Culture

1. The Era of Web3 Social

Stani Kulechov, Founder and CEO of Aave and Lens, is leading the charge on decentralized social media. Lens lowers the barrier to build what we traditionally think of as “social media” on one, unified composable social graph protocol so user experience becomes the priority, rather than user acquisition and curating a moated network effect like in Web2.

If you scanned the POAP at the Lens booth, remember to collect your Lens handle!

2. Ethereum goes to Hollywood

Camila Russo, author of The Infinite Machine is producing Ethereum’s first Hollywood full feature film. Russo’s co-producer Alejandro Miranda confirmed that they were in the process of writing the script. And because this is a film about Web3, the production of the film itself is interwoven with Web3 aspects, for example letting you appear in the film if you mint an Infinite Machine Movie NFT.

See Camila on the Bankless podcast on Ethereum’s Hollywood Moment.

3. NFTs are the key to distribute community ownership

Finally, 3mint Founder Tom Borgers, talked about how NFTs started out as a luxury speculative good but will evolve into a credible way for commercial brands and content creators to acquire customers and fans, by giving real ownership to (loyal) users, tap into new communities through complementary partnerships and leverage new channels of distribution.

If you can’t tell, the week was jam-packed.

It was nearly impossible to cover everything.

But we do know that crypto is moving forward and progressing as fast as ever.

Bear markets are for building after all.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

Gate Research Institute: Chart Pattern Analysis and Breakout Trading Strategies Chart patterns are crucial tools in technical analysis for observing market supply and demand shifts, trend continuations, and reversals. This analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of trend, volume, support/resistance, time cycles, and breakout validity, not just rote pattern recognition. Patterns are broadly categorized into reversal patterns (e.g., Double Tops/Bottoms, Head and Shoulders) and continuation patterns (e.g., Flags, Triangles, Rectangles). An effective breakout, key for trading, requires clear support/resistance, prolonged consolidation, a prevailing trend backdrop, and volume confirmation. However, breakouts are not guaranteed, as false breakouts are common. Risk must be managed through position sizing, stop-loss orders, pullback confirmations, and profit-taking in stages. Key pattern types discussed include: * **Rectangle Patterns:** Indicate market indecision within parallel support and resistance, with breakouts projecting a move equal to the pattern's width. * **Flag & Pennant Patterns:** Short-term continuation patterns following sharp price moves ("flagpoles"). * **Triangle Patterns:** Symmetrical, Ascending (bullish bias), and Descending (bearish bias) triangles, representing consolidation before a directional move. * **Head and Shoulders Patterns:** Major reversal patterns signaling trend exhaustion. The article details breakout trading strategies, defining valid breakouts by price closing beyond a key level with increased volume and minimal immediate re-entry into the prior range. It contrasts range trading with breakout trading and outlines entry methods (immediate entry, pullback entry, scaling in), stop-loss placement (based on pattern failure), and profit-taking techniques (target-based, structure-based, trend-following). It further classifies breakout outcomes: 1. **Valid Breakouts:** Strong, sustained moves in the breakout direction. 2. **Pullback Breakouts:** Price breaks out, retests the breakout level as support/resistance, then resumes the trend—offering a lower-risk entry. 3. **False Breakouts:** Price briefly breaches a level but quickly reverses back into the prior range, a common risk managed by strict stop-losses. Key validation tools for breakouts include volume analysis, the principle of support/resistance role reversal, and momentum indicators like ATR, Moving Averages, Bollinger Bands, and RSI. In conclusion, while chart patterns and breakout analysis provide a structured framework, their effectiveness relies on multiple confirming factors—trend context, volume, and proper risk management. They should be integrated into a broader trading system rather than used as standalone signals.

marsbitHá 29m

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

marsbitHá 29m

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

In a speech titled "The Industrialization of Trust," Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom (former BlackRock digital assets head) discussed the future transformation of global finance. Drawing from 20 years at BlackRock, where he led the launch of Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and tokenized funds, Chalom highlighted the immense hidden costs of establishing trust in traditional finance—estimated at over $9.3 trillion annually in the US alone due to fragmented systems, multi-day settlements, and countless reconciliations. He argued that Ethereum is emerging as the global financial "settlement layer for trust," with its robust, decentralized infrastructure securing over $300 billion in on-chain assets and most stablecoins and tokenized assets. The future, he stated, will be driven by three accelerating pillars: stablecoins (evolving beyond crypto gateways to become efficient cross-border payment rails), tokenized assets (enabling 24/7 trading and reshaping capital markets), and DeFi (providing automated, accessible financial services). A potential game-changer, Chalom added, is the fourth pillar: "Agentic Finance," where AI agents autonomously execute programmable financial transactions via smart contracts and stablecoins. He envisions individuals soon having AI-powered "CFOs in their pockets" to optimize idle capital and manage tokenized portfolios. This shift, facilitated by Ethereum's trustless settlement, could multiply on-chain transaction volume 1000x within a year, moving finance toward a seamless, digitized future.

marsbitHá 29m

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

marsbitHá 29m

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbitHá 41m

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbitHá 41m

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片