Ripple Turns To Big Business, Buys Palisade To Spark Global Crypto Use

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-11-04Última atualização em 2025-11-04

Resumo

Ripple has acquired Palisade, a London-based firm that offers wallet-as-a-service and institutional custody tools. According to company statements and industry...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Ripple has acquired Palisade, a London-based firm that offers wallet-as-a-service and institutional custody tools. According to company statements and industry reports, the deal adds capabilities for corporations and fintech clients that want ready-made wallets and custodial support. The price was not disclosed.

Related Reading: Bitcoin Mining Frenzy Turns Iran Into A ‘Paradise For Illegal Miners’ – CEO

Palisade Brings Wallet Tech And MPC

Palisade’s stack includes multi-party computation (MPC) for key management and support for multiple blockchains, including XRPL, Ethereum and Solana.

Based on reports, the firm has experience with rapid wallet provisioning and a model that appeals to firms that do not want to build custody from scratch. Palisade also holds regulatory ties in Europe, including a French custodian license alongside its UK presence.

Custody And Payments Options

According to Ripple, the acquisition is meant to boost its ability to serve corporates and crypto firms with custody tied into payments workflows.

The company already points to a broad regulatory footprint, with 75+ licenses claimed around the world. Industry sources estimate Ripple’s M&A activity in crypto infrastructure at about $4 billion so far, driven by a string of purchases aimed at broadening its services.

According to Monica Long, Ripple president, corporates are “poised to drive the next massive wave of crypto adoption.”

What Was Disclosed And What Wasn’t

Reports have disclosed product and technical details, but not the deal amount. That omission leaves room for questions on how Palisade will be folded into Ripple’s existing products and which markets will get the new combined offering first.

Integration plans were not given in full detail, and observers say timing could shape how quickly customers see changes.

XRP market cap currently at $136 billion. Chart: TradingView

Possible Effects On Customers And XRP Use

Some clients may get faster time to market for wallets and custodial services because they can use Palisade’s WaaS model under Ripple’s umbrella. That could matter to nonbank corporates and fintechs that are testing tokenization and digital-asset payments.

Whether the move will push more direct use of XRP in corporate flows was not clarified in public statements. A more tightly knit custody and payment stack could influence sentiment, but any effect on token demand would depend on product choices that have not yet been announced.

Related Reading: Protect Your Wealth With Bitcoin: Kiyosaki Signals Beginning Of ‘Massive Crash’

Analysts will watch for three things: where the combined service will launch first, how the firms handle licensing across jurisdictions, and how quickly key management systems get merged.

Reports also raise the question of competition, since other custody and wallet providers are expanding too. How Ripple positions Palisade — as a back-end tool, a branded offering, or something in between — will shape customer interest.

Featured image from Gemini, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Follow

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Full Profile

Related Posts

Best Wallet Presale Nears End After Raising $16.7M

Best Wallet Presale Nears End After Raising $16.7M — Final 24 Days to Buy $BEST Before Exchange Listings

6 hours ago
$BTC Price Prediction After Crash to $105K: $HYPER Hits $25.7M

$BTC Price Prediction After Crash to $105K: $HYPER Hits $25.7M

9 hours ago
Solana ETFs Are Green Despite Hawkish Fed: Promising Altcoins Like PEPENODE Amp Up

Solana ETFs Are Green Despite Hawkish Fed: Promising Altcoins Like PEPENODE Amp Up

9 hours ago
Wall Street's Matador Plans to Buy $100M Bitcoin Dip: $HYPER Is Best Crypto to Buy Now

Matador Secures $100M to Stack Bitcoin – Bitcoin Hyper Brings the Utility to $BTC

10 hours ago
David Sacks Calls Crypto ‘The Industry of the Future’ — $BEST Stands Out Despite the Dip

David Sacks Calls Crypto ‘The Industry of the Future’ — $BEST Stands Out Despite Dip

10 hours ago
Crypto whales kopen massaal Cardano - ADA koers analyse na crypto crash

Crypto whales kopen massaal Cardano – ADA koers analyse na crypto crash

11 hours ago

Leituras Relacionadas

Farewell to Crash-Style Plunges: An In-Depth Review of the Crypto Lending and Futures Markets in Q2 2026

This report analyzes the Q2 2026 crypto lending and derivatives market, highlighting a continuation of controlled deleveraging. Unlike the 2022 crash, where loan volumes plummeted 55% in a single quarter, the current downturn is characterized by a gradual, stepwise decline across CeFi, DeFi, and crypto-collateralized CDP stablecoins, with Q2 seeing a total reduction of $113.3 billion (-16.78%) to $561.6 billion. DeFi lending saw the sharpest quarterly drop (-27.61%), while CeFi borrowing declined more moderately (-9.62%). For the first time since Q3 2023, CeFi outstanding loans surpassed DeFi. Corporate digital asset treasury (DAT) debt also decreased by $15 billion, largely due to a debt buyback by Strategy Inc. Futures open interest (OI) saw a modest 3.08% quarterly decline to $1032 billion, with notable divergence: Bitcoin OI fell 6.24%, while Ethereum OI dropped 26.31%. Both rebounded in July. A deep dive into Aave V3 revealed high leverage, particularly within "e-mode" loans, which are heavily concentrated on Ethereum staking/restaking tokens, with debt-weighted health factors near liquidation thresholds. The report concludes that the market is undergoing a healthier, managed deleveraging cycle driven by voluntary risk reduction rather than forced liquidations or counterparty failures, suggesting increased resilience against a repeat of the 2022 cascade. Early Q3 2026 data indicates potential stabilization in futures OI and DeFi lending volumes.

marsbitHá 9m

Farewell to Crash-Style Plunges: An In-Depth Review of the Crypto Lending and Futures Markets in Q2 2026

marsbitHá 9m

Hard Tech Investors Flock to Lending Business

Hard tech investors are increasingly turning to bridge loans as a strategic tool. Once a last-resort lifeline for struggling portfolio companies, these short-term loans are now a competitive weapon to secure deals in hot sectors like embodied AI and AI chips. The key innovation is the "convertible clause," allowing the loan to convert into equity at a pre-agreed discount in the next funding round, acting like a call option for investors. This structure offers downside protection (repayment with interest) while locking in future equity upside. This trend is driven by overheated fundraising in specific sectors, where capital is concentrated in a few top companies, valuations soar rapidly, and investment cycles compress. Fearing dilution or missing out, existing investors use bridge loans to pre-emptively secure their stake in the next round. The practice is so prevalent it even challenges traditional bank lending. While beneficial for startups needing immediate cash, these loans come with strings attached, such as exclusivity clauses and conversion penalties. The shift from pure equity bets to this hybrid debt-equity strategy reflects a broader market move towards risk mitigation and calculated positioning in a volatile, high-stakes investment landscape.

marsbitHá 9m

Hard Tech Investors Flock to Lending Business

marsbitHá 9m

Crypto Funding Halves in Q1, Why Is Stablecoin Payment Still Attracting Money Against the Trend?

Crypto venture capital funding fell roughly 50% quarter-over-quarter in Q1 2026, yet the stablecoin payments sector was a notable exception, continuing to secure significant funding rounds. This shift signals that capital is moving away from speculative "token narratives" toward companies generating real revenue, as stablecoins evolve from a trading tool into payment infrastructure. Despite the overall funding slowdown, companies like Rain, OpenFX, and RedotPay completed major raises, focusing on areas such as card issuance, cross-border payments, and banking connectivity. Investors are attracted to the sector's potential to address long-standing inefficiencies in traditional cross-border payments through 24/7 settlement and clearer revenue models like transaction fees and FX spreads. However, the momentum may be overstated. On-chain stablecoin transaction volume does not equate to real-world payments for goods and services, and funding is concentrated in a few leading firms with reported volumes and customers. Key challenges remain, including compliance, fiat on/off-ramps, local banking relationships, and the risk of core services becoming commoditized. Looking ahead, capital is likely to flow into areas like cross-border B2B payments, bank-to-stablecoin connectivity, stablecoin-linked cards, multi-chain payment orchestration, and payments for AI agents. Ultimately, the investor interest reflects a bet on the necessary infrastructure to integrate stablecoins into the traditional financial system, with future valuations hinging on demonstrable payment volume, real revenue, and profitable market expansion.

marsbitHá 44m

Crypto Funding Halves in Q1, Why Is Stablecoin Payment Still Attracting Money Against the Trend?

marsbitHá 44m

South Korean Retail Investors 'Move from Seoul to Wall Street': Buying SK Hynix ADR, Betting on Triple-Leverage ETF

A surge of Korean retail investors is shifting funds from the volatile Seoul market to Wall Street, intensifying their bets on the AI theme through unconventional and high-risk instruments. Data shows Korean investors were net buyers of about $4.5 billion in US stocks in July, nearing a yearly peak. A notable trend is their purchase of approximately $840 million worth of SK Hynix American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), despite a significant 10% premium over the company's domestic shares, leading analysts to label the move as speculative and irrational. Simultaneously, Korean traders are heavily favoring leveraged ETFs. The triple-leveraged semiconductor ETF SOXL was the most-bought US product in July, with leveraged products occupying four of the top ten spots. Experts note that this shift in geography does not represent a diversification of risk; instead, investors are merely expressing the same concentrated bet on AI hardware through different, often riskier, US-listed vehicles. Analysts warn that while this capital inflow is unlikely to systemically impact the vast US institutional market, it risks creating localized distortions and amplifying volatility, particularly in the targeted sectors and instruments. The move follows a sharp correction in the Korean market, where high leverage in semiconductor stocks and related ETFs had previously led to significant losses, prompting this search for alternative avenues to chase the AI narrative.

marsbitHá 1h

South Korean Retail Investors 'Move from Seoul to Wall Street': Buying SK Hynix ADR, Betting on Triple-Leverage ETF

marsbitHá 1h

Bithumb's First Half Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76 Million, Where Did the Profits Go?

**Title: Bithumb H1 2026 Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76M – Where Did the Profits Go?** Despite a headline net loss of approximately 108.7 billion KRW (~$76.44 million) for the first half of 2026, a detailed breakdown reveals Bithumb's core exchange business remained profitable. The significant loss was primarily driven by two major non-operating items: substantial losses on the disposal and valuation of the company's own cryptocurrency holdings (net loss ~$48.21 million) and a sharp increase in litigation provisions (~$25.93 million), largely linked to a regulatory fine. Operating revenue fell 48.7% year-on-year to ~$119 million, almost entirely from transaction fees, as market activity cooled. While the company drastically cut marketing and subsidy expenses by ~70% to protect margins, more rigid costs like payment processing and salaries declined only modestly. This highlights the vulnerability of its highly fee-dependent revenue model in a down market. Total assets decreased by ~$584 million, but this was largely attributable to an ~86% drop in client KRW deposits. The market value of client crypto assets under custody also fell (~32.7%), partly influenced by declining cryptocurrency prices rather than solely client withdrawals. In summary, the report indicates underlying exchange profitability was eroded by significant crypto asset losses and mounting regulatory/legal costs, against a backdrop of declining trading revenue. Future focus should be on revenue recovery, managing crypto-related损益, and the ongoing impact of regulatory challenges.

marsbitHá 1h

Bithumb's First Half Report: Net Loss Exceeds $76 Million, Where Did the Profits Go?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow