Solana Lands Major Win As Western Union Goes Crypto

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-10-29Última atualização em 2025-10-29

Resumo

Western Union said it will launch a dollar-backed stablecoin and build a new crypto payment network on Solana, a move...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Western Union said it will launch a dollar-backed stablecoin and build a new crypto payment network on Solana, a move that could reshape how the company moves money across borders.

According to company filings and press releases, the token will be called USDPT and is scheduled for the first half of 2026. Anchorage Digital Bank will issue the token, reports show.

Western Union Taps Solana And Anchorage Digital Bank

Based on reports, Western Union plans a “Digital Asset Network” that will let users send, receive, hold and spend USDPT through its global agent network.

The company serves more than 100 million users across 200+ countries and territories. Some sources place the user base at 150 million, which helps explain why Western Union picked a blockchain built for high throughput.

Solana was chosen for low transaction costs and the ability to handle many operations per second.

Technical partners are already named. Anchorage Digital Bank, which has US federal oversight, will custody and issue USDPT.

Reports say Western Union will use its agent locations to convert between fiat cash and the stablecoin, giving people on both sides of a transfer a way to get real dollars or dollar-tokens. That hybrid model aims to mix a familiar cash network with token rails.

What This Means For Solana And Remittances

Market observers say this is a major vote of confidence for Solana. If millions of Western Union transfers start routing through token rails, Solana could see a spike in transactions and demand for its native token, SOL, to pay fees.

Meanwhile, questions remain. Can the chain cope with the scale implied by Western Union’s reach? One analysis asked whether Solana can handle 100 million users sending dollar tokens around the world.

Scalability tests and stress runs will matter, and Western Union’s rollout plans will likely phase in markets to reduce risk.

SOL market cap currently at $106 billion. Chart: TradingView

Regulatory And Custodial Setup

According to regulators and industry watchers, stablecoins face tight oversight in many countries. Western Union’s plan depends on regulatory approvals and clear custody arrangements.

Anchorage’s regulated status helps, but local rules in some markets could delay or limit service. Reports also point to the need for strong reserve practices, audits and consumer protections before full public use.

Western Union is pitching the initiative as a way to modernize payments while keeping control over the economics tied to the token.

The company says a managed stablecoin could lower costs and speed settlement on certain corridors. Analysts will watch remittance corridors where cash pickup is still common — places like the Philippines — to see how quickly users accept token-based transfers.

Featured image from Social Press, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Criptomoedas em alta

Leituras Relacionadas

Same $5 Rate, Bill Differs by 30%, OpenAI Exec: Token Pricing Is Never Directly Comparable

Here is a summary of the article in English: **Title: Priced at $5, Bills Vary by 30%. OpenAI Executive: Token Prices Are Not Directly Comparable** A key takeaway from OpenAI's Codex lead, Tibo, is that a "token" is not a standardized unit for comparing AI model costs, akin to grams or kilowatt-hours. He uses an analogy: two identical pizzas priced per slice can yield different total costs depending on how they're cut. Similarly, different models use different "tokenizers" to segment text, meaning the same input text can produce vastly different token counts. For instance, the same text was tokenized as 766 tokens by GPT-5.6 Sol and 1170 tokens by Claude Opus 5—a 34.5% difference—despite both models advertising the same input price of $5 per million tokens. This discrepancy arises because each company trains its own tokenizer based on its training data, affecting how common or rare word combinations are split. The problem isn't cross-vendor only. Even Anthropic warns that its newer models (Claude 4.7+) use a different tokenizer, producing roughly 30% more tokens for the same text than earlier versions, so cost estimates shouldn't be reused across model generations. Bill differences stem from four main factors: 1) Tokenizer efficiency (input token count), 2) Caching (e.g., GPT-5.6 Sol offers a much lower cache input rate), 3) Output pricing (which can outweigh input savings in agent workflows), and 4) Context length pricing tiers (e.g., GPT-5.6 Sol charges double the input rate for entire requests exceeding 272K tokens). Tibo also addressed user reports of GPT-5.6 Sol's context window being limited in practice, sharing configuration code to manually expand it to 1 million tokens. However, he cautioned that larger windows increase the risk of hitting higher pricing tiers as longer session histories are processed repeatedly. The article concludes that the true metric should shift from "price per million tokens" to "price per successful outcome." The most accurate way to compare costs is to run identical real-world tasks (with the same prompts, tools, and data) through different models, accounting for all variables like tokenization, caching, output length, and context pricing. Ultimately, what matters is the total cost to complete a specific job, not the nominal token price.

marsbitHá 2m

Same $5 Rate, Bill Differs by 30%, OpenAI Exec: Token Pricing Is Never Directly Comparable

marsbitHá 2m

Are Big VC Funds Monopolizing the Seed Round, Leaving Small VCs with No Choice but to Give Up?

**Title: Are Big VCs Monopolizing Seed Rounds? Is Giving Up the Only Path for Small VCs?** In a frank and critical commentary, the author argues that the venture capital landscape has shifted dramatically: large, multi-stage funds are aggressively moving into seed-stage investing, leveraging their brand recognition, massive capital, and resources to dominate deals. They outcompete smaller, specialized funds for stakes in even the earliest startups, as founders increasingly prefer established names. The piece asserts that success in VC now hinges almost entirely on securing a position in the handful of globally transformative companies each year (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic). For funds that miss these "winner-takes-most" opportunities, relevance fades. The author sarcastically suggests small fund managers should advise their portfolio companies to seek acquisition by such giants and then invest via SPVs, or abandon early-stage investing altogether to chase less ambiguous growth rounds. Further, the author claims the "best" founders—those from elite backgrounds—command premium valuations and align with top-tier funds, leaving little room for others. The relentless focus on AI is presented as another pressure point; not dedicating a fund entirely to AI is deemed a path to irrelevance, akin to missing prior cycles like SaaS or crypto. Ultimately, the letter delivers a cynical conclusion: with capital and power concentrating, true differentiation is nearly impossible. It suggests that for many small VCs, surrendering to this new reality—rather than evolving, competing, or trying something different—might be the most rational, if grim, course of action. The piece serves as a stark warning about capital concentration and the existential challenges facing smaller investment firms.

marsbitHá 3m

Are Big VC Funds Monopolizing the Seed Round, Leaving Small VCs with No Choice but to Give Up?

marsbitHá 3m

Bank of Russia: 12 Largest Banks to Connect Digital Ruble from September 1, 2026

The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) announced that all 12 of the country's systemically important banks will be ready to offer clients digital ruble accounts and transactions starting September 1, 2026. According to Alla Bakina, director of the CBR's national payment system department, these banks cover over 80% of the domestic payment market. The digital ruble is described as a new form of the existing currency, functioning as a cashless payment method but held directly in a user's wallet on the CBR platform. Nine other banks designated as significant payment market participants are also expected to provide access, with most aiming to complete integration by autumn 2026. Starting from the September launch date, major retail chains with annual revenue exceeding 120 million rubles will be required to accept digital ruble payments, though adoption for citizens remains voluntary. The rollout follows a delayed pilot phase, with mass implementation postponed from 2025. The CBR's model currently offers basic account functionality without interest accrual, unlike China's digital yuan, which began paying interest in early 2026. The announcement positions Russia among dozens of countries testing Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), though the digital ruble's potential role in cross-border settlements, particularly within BRICS, remains an open question for its future international relevance.

cryptonews.ruHá 8m

Bank of Russia: 12 Largest Banks to Connect Digital Ruble from September 1, 2026

cryptonews.ruHá 8m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar WIN

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de WINkLink (WIN) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar WINkLink (WIN) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu WINkLink (WIN)Depois de comprar o teu WINkLink (WIN), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona WINkLink (WIN)Transaciona facilmente WINkLink (WIN) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

565 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar WIN

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de WIN (WIN) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片