EU Approves 19th Sanctions Package Banning Russian LNG Imports

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-10-23Última atualização em 2025-10-23

The European Union on Wednesday approved its 19th package of sanctions against Russia over its ongoing war in Ukraine, according to the Danish EU presidency.

The agreement, reached in Brussels after weeks of talks, targets Moscow’s energy sector through a ban on Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports, while also expanding trade and travel restrictions.

Slovakia Drops Objection After EU Assurances

According to a Reuters report, Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency, said all 27 EU countries have now agreed to the package after Slovakia lifted its final objection. Slovakia’s Prime Minister, Robert Fico, had asked for guarantees from the European Commission about high energy prices and how new climate rules could affect local industries like carmakers and heavy manufacturing.

After receiving written assurances, Slovakia dropped its objection, and allowed the sanctions to move forward. Officials said a written approval process is already underway, and the package will officially take effect by Thursday morning.

LNG Ban to Start in Two Phases

The LNG ban will roll out in two steps. Short-term contracts will end in six months, while long-term contracts will stop completely on January 1, 2027. This timeline means the EU will stop buying Russian LNG one year earlier than the European Commission first planned.

“Sanctions have a real impact and are hitting the Russian economy. Moscow is facing increasing difficulties in financing its illegal war of aggression.” Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said in a statement. Along with the LNG ban, the EU also added 117 ships from Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet,” mostly oil tankers used to bypass oil restrictions. This brings the total number of sanctioned vessels to 558.

The package also lists several banks and companies in Kazakhstan and Belarus and four linked to China’s oil industry, including two refineries, a trading company, and another involved in helping Moscow evade restrictions. Their names will be published after formal adoption, according to EU diplomatic sources cited by Reuters.

Also Read: Coinbase Unveils Payments MCP for AI To Transact Crypto

Follow The Crypto Times on Google News to Stay Updated!

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Gets Rejected At This Level For The First Time In 5 Years, Here Are The Targets

Bitcoin has been rejected at a crucial long-term resistance level around $83,000, marking its first failure at this macro price point in five years. According to analyst Chiefy, this trendline has defined major cycle tops since 2021 and acted as a key support in early 2025. The recent rejection saw Bitcoin drop to $74,000 before a slight recovery to $76,580, aligning with a significant moving average historically linked to major market turns. If the current support around $74,000 breaks, the analyst projects three potential downside targets: $68,000, $61,000, and an extreme target near $48,000, which aligns with the weekly 350 MA. Market sentiment has shifted to fear, with the Crypto Fear & Greed Index at 39, indicating growing caution among investors.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Bitcoin Gets Rejected At This Level For The First Time In 5 Years, Here Are The Targets

bitcoinistHá 1h

Bankless Founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Bankless founder David Hoffman explains his decision to sell all his ETH. He clarifies this is not due to bearishness on Ethereum itself, which he remains extremely optimistic about, but rather because he believes the core "ETH is Money" narrative he championed has already been priced in. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve status as a global reserve currency, Ethereum needed to execute perfectly across all layers—governance, technology, L2 coordination, and market dominance—faster than competitors. While Ethereum has performed admirably and earned its current valuation, the window for a fundamental revaluation of ETH upward has likely closed. Key factors include: the clear market correlation between L1 chain revenue/fees and native asset price (evident with SOL and NEAR); the failure of the "strong version" of crypto (ideological, self-sustaining) to maintain lasting mainstream appeal beyond a brief period; and the reality that Ethereum's architecture acts as a "giver," providing security and tokenization at cost, which benefits other monies (like stablecoins) as much as or more than ETH itself. He concludes that Ethereum's success will increasingly accrue to its applications and L2s (following a "fat app" theory), with ETH structurally positioned to capture only minimal value. Therefore, he sold to reallocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

marsbitHá 1h

marsbitHá 1h

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手Há 1h

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手Há 1h

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbitHá 2h

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbitHá 2h

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbitHá 2h