Ant Group, JD.com Halt Stablecoin Projects After Beijing Warning

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-10-19Última atualização em 2025-10-19

China’s leading tech firms have quietly put their stablecoin ambitions on hold after a direct intervention from Beijing, which raised red flags over the growing influence of privately issued digital currencies.

Alibaba-backed Ant Group and e-commerce giant JD.com were among the companies gearing up to participate in Hong Kong’s pilot stablecoin programme, with plans to issue asset-backed digital tokens and tokenised bonds. 

But multiple sources familiar with the matter said both firms halted progress after receiving clear instructions from mainland regulators — including the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) and the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), to stand down.

Concerns over control and China’s digital yuan project

Officials from the PBoC reportedly advised against joining Hong Kong’s first stablecoin rollout, citing unease about allowing private players to issue currency-like products. “The real regulatory concern is, who has the ultimate right of coinage — the central bank or any private companies on the market?” one person familiar with the briefings told the Financial Times.

The central bank’s stance reflects broader worries that privately managed stablecoins could compete with its own digital yuan (e-CNY) — a flagship project aimed at modernising China’s payment infrastructure and tightening state oversight of digital money.

A global echo of stablecoin caution

China’s latest move isn’t happening in isolation. Regulators worldwide are tightening their stance on stablecoins, wary of how dollar-pegged tokens could disrupt financial systems. The European Central Bank has also raised alarms, saying that the growing use of dollar-backed stablecoins could limit its ability to steer monetary policy.

Meanwhile, in August, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) opened applications for stablecoin issuers, turning the city into a closely watched testing ground for regulated digital currency innovation. Interest from mainland players surged over the summer, with discussions even exploring renminbi-backed stablecoins to promote the yuan’s internationalisation.

Zhu Guangyao, China’s former vice-minister of finance, had earlier argued that “the strategic purpose behind the US promotion of stablecoins is to preserve dollar supremacy”, urging China to respond with a yuan-pegged digital alternative as part of its long-term financial strategy.

Beijing turns cautious after Zhou Xiaochuan’s warning

Momentum shifted after former PBoC governor Zhou Xiaochuan urged restraint during a July financial forum. “We need to be vigilant against the risk of stablecoins being excessively used for asset speculation, as misdirection could trigger fraud and instability in the financial system,” he said. 

Zhou also questioned the actual need for tokenisation, arguing that “although many believe stablecoins will reshape the payments system, in reality, there is little room to cut costs in the current system, particularly in retail payments.”

For now, China’s message is clear: innovation is welcome, but when it comes to currency, control will remain firmly in the hands of the state.

Neither the PBoC nor HKMA commented on the matter, while CAC, Ant Group, and JD.com did not respond to requests for comment.

Also Read: Trump Says China Tariffs “Will Not Stand” Amid Crypto Market Crash


Mobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

Morning News | Coinbase Partners with Standard Chartered to Expand Multi-Currency Fiat Channels; Sharplink and Forward to be Included in Russell Indices; JPMorgan May Issue Stablecoin in the Future

Daily Crypto Recap: Key Developments Institutional adoption continues: Coinbase partners with Standard Chartered to expand multi-currency fiat rails for institutions via Coinbase Prime, supporting AUD, SGD, CAD, CHF, EUR, and GBP. Meanwhile, Sharplink and Forward Industries, companies holding significant ETH and SOL reserves respectively, are set to be included in the Russell indexes, providing indirect crypto exposure to traditional index investors. Regulatory and compliance moves are in focus. Hong Kong's monetary authority announced new measures for investment accounts of mainland Chinese investors, including retroactive document checks to January 2023. Prediction market Polymarket is considering implementing KYC requirements to address sanctions and legal risks. Major financial players signal deeper involvement. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon suggested the bank might issue a stablecoin in the future. Concurrently, Falcon Finance and Anchorage Digital launched fUSD, a compliant, institution-focused stablecoin. Market sentiment presents a mixed picture. Bitmine's Tom Lee predicts an incoming crypto "supercycle," driven by Wall Street tokenization and AI agents, with Ethereum as a key beneficiary. However, a prominent trader cautions that the current period of investor losses may not be long enough to confirm a bear market bottom, and TD Cowen analysts note diminished chances for U.S. crypto market structure legislation this year due to a worsening political climate. Other notable news includes a16z crypto's observation that most tokenized assets are merely "digitized" and not actively used in DeFi, South Korea's crypto trading volume falling to about 8% of KOSPI's, and the Chinese Supreme Court stating it will research judicial rules for virtual currency cases.

链捕手Há 1h

Morning News | Coinbase Partners with Standard Chartered to Expand Multi-Currency Fiat Channels; Sharplink and Forward to be Included in Russell Indices; JPMorgan May Issue Stablecoin in the Future

链捕手Há 1h

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

For years, real estate tokenization has been hailed as a breakthrough technology poised to democratize property investment. In theory, it promises fractional ownership of premium assets, rapid transactions, and enhanced liquidity. Yet, in practice, it has failed to gain traction, accounting for less than 0.1% of the global real estate market. The core issue is not a lack of tokens, but the absence of a robust legal, operational, and compliant framework that grants them credibility as financial instruments. The industry initially erred by prioritizing technology over investor needs, creating products with unclear ownership and unreliable liquidity. Key infrastructure remains missing: legally sound ownership structures, compliant transfer mechanisms, professional servicing, and interoperability with traditional finance. This regulatory ambiguity and operational complexity deter institutional investors, who already have access to established, well-governed investment channels. A mature model would feature low minimum investments in institutional-grade assets, transparent rental income distribution, and genuine liquidity through regulated secondary markets. While regulatory progress in regions like the UAE and growth in other tokenized asset sectors (like treasuries) are positive signs, the focus must shift from issuing tokens to building foundational systems. The investment proposition of tokenized real estate is not to create new returns, but to improve access, efficiency, and liquidity for existing income-generating properties. For mainstream adoption, the sector must demonstrate tangible economic advantages over traditional models, not just technical novelty. The next phase depends on proving scalable, compliant operations with auditable track records. The barrier is no longer technology, but infrastructure and regulation. The vision remains unfulfilled until this gap is bridged.

marsbitHá 1h

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

marsbitHá 1h

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

The article discusses the ongoing challenge of defining and achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It notes that industry leaders have set vague, often profit- or time-based benchmarks for AGI, while the concept itself lacks a consensus definition—a situation the article compares to a "Rorschach test." It highlights a recent 2025 paper by researcher Michael Timothy Bennett, who proposes a new, measurable definition. Bennett frames AGI not as mimicking human performance on tests, which current large language models (LLMs) have already mastered, but as an "artificial scientist." A true AGI, according to this view, should be able to widely and efficiently adapt to new environments and tasks within real-world constraints (like computational and energy limits), focusing on the *discovery of new knowledge* rather than the replication of existing data. The author contrasts this with the current dominant approach of "scale-maxing"—massively scaling up data, parameters, and compute. While powerful, this method leads to models that fail on out-of-distribution problems and lack core intelligent abilities: they are passive learners, cannot reason causally, and cannot actively experiment or balance exploration with exploitation. The article argues that Bennett's framework offers a crucial shift. It makes AGI a quantifiable engineering problem and proposes new evaluation "adaptation benchmarks" that test an AI's ability to actively learn in novel scenarios. The conclusion is that achieving AGI will require a fundamental reset—a fusion of multiple methodologies beyond simple scaling, moving AI from mimicking patterns to embodying the scientific spirit of inquiry and discovery.

marsbitHá 2h

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片