Why traders should care about Pump.fun’s 50% drop in buybacks

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-09-23Última atualização em 2025-09-24

Key Takeaways

Why is Pump.fun facing pressure?

Buybacks plunged 50% to $1.27 million, revenue dropped to $1.3 million, and transactions hit a three-month low.

What levels matter for PUMP?

Support sat at $0.0055 with risk of $0.0050. Reclaiming $0.0065 requires stronger inflows from the Pump.fun team.


Pump.fun [PUMP] has struggled since reaching $0.0087 on the 15th of September. The token traded within a descending channel and hit $0.0053.

At press time, PUMP exchanged hands at $0.0058, a 25% weekly loss. Its market cap fell from $3 billion to $2.06 billion, signaling weaker inflows.

But why is PUMP dropping?

Buybacks fall back to August levels

Amid sustained price, AMBCrypto observed that the primary factor causing the price drop was reduced capital inflows. 

According to crypto analyst Clemente, Pump.fun’s daily token buybacks declined 50% in USD terms compared to 10 days ago.

Pump token purchasesPump token purchases

Source: Clemente on X

In fact, on the 22nd of September, the team acquired 203 million PUMP, worth $1.27 million, the lowest since the 5th of August.

Clemente argued that paying $3 million daily to creators and another $3 million to fund buybacks was unsustainable while daily active users stayed flat.

Revenue decline hits activity

Significantly, the Pump.fun team has reduced acquisition because of its reduced Revenue, which they spend on purchases. 

According to Artemis data, the protocol’s Revenue declined to reach $1.3 million, levels last witnessed on the 8th of September. 

PUMP RevenuePUMP Revenue

Source: Artemis

Such a drop in revenue indicated reduced protocol activity and usage. Inasmuch as so, Transactions by Product fell to a three-month low of 1.4 million, with Pumpswap recording none.

Pump Transactions by productPump Transactions by product

Source: Artemis

That trend left fewer funds available to sustain large-scale buybacks.

Spot and Futures data confirm caution

Interestingly, besides the performance, investors in the Spot and Futures markets have reduced exposure significantly.

According to CoinGlass, Spot Inflow surged to $101 million compared to $97 million in outflows. As a result, the token’s Spot Netflow soared 179% to $4.27 million.

Pump spot flowsPump spot flows

Source: CoinGlass

On the Futures side, outflows reached $581.9 million while inflows stood at $554.3 million, leaving a net negative $27.7 million. The shift pointed to reduced leverage and cautious positioning by traders.

Pump Futures flowPump Futures flow

Source: CoinGlass

Can $0.0055 hold?

With buybacks cut, revenues falling, and derivatives showing net outflows, PUMP faced continued pressure. If these conditions persisted, the token could break below $0.0055 support and move toward $0.0050.

A rebound would need stronger inflows from Pump.fun’s team. That could help PUMP retest resistance near $0.0065.

Share

Leituras Relacionadas

IOSG Founder: Ethereum Doesn't Need Another Leap of Technical Faith, It Needs a Musk-style Compromise

Jocy, founder of IOSG Ventures, argues that Ethereum does not need renewed technological faith but a "Musk-like compromise." The recent formation of ETHLabs—funded by major ETH holders like BitMine and Lubin—highlights a market-driven move to fill a gap left by the Ethereum Foundation (EF), signaling a loss of confidence in its decentralized, hands-off approach. The core critique contrasts Vitalik Buterin's (V) idealistic, technology-first vision with Elon Musk's pragmatic, business-driven execution. The author asserts Ethereum's current shortage is not another technical roadmap but a clear, real-world application narrative and a leader willing to engage directly with commercial realities—like Musk. Internal issues are emphasized, citing EF's management problems and talent drain. While the new decentralized model with independent nodes like ETHLabs addresses the single foundation's limitations, it risks fragmentation without cohesive direction. True cohesion, the author suggests, must come from a shared, compelling narrative around ETH's value, not just from aligned financial interests. Independence claims for new entities are seen as aspirational, needing years of transparency to build trust. The ultimate threat is not competitors like Solana, but the broader shift of attention and talent toward AI. Ethereum has a limited window—12 to 18 months—to recapture focus by delivering tangible, real-world applications. The conclusion urges V to shift from abstract ideals to grounded, pragmatic leadership. The time for this crucial pivot is running out.

marsbitHá 57m

IOSG Founder: Ethereum Doesn't Need Another Leap of Technical Faith, It Needs a Musk-style Compromise

marsbitHá 57m

Google Starts Selling TPUs, Big Tech Aims to Produce "Low-Cost Tokens" with AI Chips

Google has begun selling its proprietary TPU chips and AI computing hardware directly to third-party data centers and clients, marking a strategic shift. Previously only accessible via cloud rentals, TPUs are specialized processors designed for the matrix and tensor operations central to AI models. By combining thousands into supercomputing clusters managed by CPUs, Google achieves high-efficiency AI processing. This move enables Google’s Gemini AI to offer competitive token pricing, challenging rivals like OpenAI. It also signals a broader industry trend where AI compute is becoming a commoditized resource like electricity. While NVIDIA remains dominant with its CUDA ecosystem and high-performance GPUs, the focus is shifting from raw power to cost efficiency and system integration. Google’s approach mirrors NVIDIA’s by selling an entire ecosystem—hardware, software, and data center expertise—rather than just chips. This threatens NVIDIA’s grip on the mid-range inference market, where lower-cost, efficient solutions are increasingly demanded. Similarly, cloud providers like Huawei Cloud and Alibaba Cloud in China are developing their own AI chip ecosystems (e.g., Ascend, Zhenwu), packaging chips, clusters, and tools into full-stack solutions. They aim to reduce token costs and capture market share through integrated systems. In summary, the AI infrastructure race is evolving from a competition for the strongest chips to a contest for the most efficient and cost-effective systems. Google’s TPU sales highlight this transition, emphasizing that future success lies in delivering affordable, scalable AI compute as a foundational service.

marsbitHá 1h

Google Starts Selling TPUs, Big Tech Aims to Produce "Low-Cost Tokens" with AI Chips

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片