Ripple Vs. SEC Battle Update: Lawsuit Officially Over As $125M Receipt Of Payment To Regulator Surfaces

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-09-23Última atualização em 2025-09-23

Resumo

Former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel has revealed that the $125 million monetary penalty in the Ripple Vs. SEC case has...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel has revealed that the $125 million monetary penalty in the Ripple Vs. SEC case has been paid to the U.S. Treasury. This officially ends the long-running legal battle between the crypto firm and the regulator. 

Ripple Vs. SEC Case Ends As Crypto Firm Pays Monetary Judgment

In an X post, Fagel confirmed that the $125 million penalty in the Ripple vs. SEC case was paid to the U.S. Treasury last month. He shared a letter addressed to Judge Analisa Torres, which stated that both parties had agreed to the release of the funds from escrow for the crypto firm to pay the full court-ordered penalty plus statutory interest. 

Furthermore, the letter revealed that the SEC had provided the appropriate wire transfer instructions after which Ripple directed the bank to make the payment, and the bank confirmed that the agreed amount had been released. Meanwhile, the balance of the fund was returned to the crypto firm, with all these procedures formally ending the Ripple vs. SEC case. 

Ripple
Source: Document from Marc Fagel on X

Notably, this payment follows the Court of Appeals’ approval of both parties’ motion to dismiss their respective appeals in the Ripple vs. SEC case last month. The $125 million had been kept in escrow around the time when Ripple and the SEC filed their appeals. The crypto firm had asked for this as an injunction to prevent having to pay the SEC while the appeal was ongoing, since there was the possibility of the sum being reduced. 

The appeal didn’t proceed as planned, as the emergence of a pro-crypto SEC administration following Trump’s return to the White House led to a settlement between both parties. However, Judge Torres opted against adopting the settlement agreement and ordered that Ripple must still pay the $125 million penalty. Both parties agreed to dismiss their respective appeals in the Ripple vs. SEC and simply adhere to Judge Torres’ judgment.  

Lawsuit No Longer Responsible For Price Action 

In an X post, legal expert Bill Morgan remarked that the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit excuse has run its course for any further lack of XRP adoption or flat price action. Basically, the lawsuit cannot be held responsible if the XRP price underperforms moving forward. The altcoin had rallied to as high as $3.4 following the joint motion to dismiss the case, but has traded below this level since then. 

The XRP price is currently on a downtrend amid the broader crypto market correction. Morgan pointed out that the current XRP decline is due to the heavy correlation with Bitcoin. This came as he made light of the fact that the altcoin has been down during this period despite several bullish fundamentals that have emerged. 

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $2.87, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP
XRP trading at $2.86 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Leituras Relacionadas

Coldcard Theft Reflection: Source Code Visibility Does Not Equal Security

The article examines the open-source vs. closed-source debate in crypto, prompted by a theft of over $100M in Bitcoin from Coldcard hardware wallets. It clarifies key terminology: true "Free and Open Source Software" (FOSS) grants four essential freedoms (use, study, share, modify), while "source available" code, like Coldcard's firmware, may have usage restrictions. The piece argues that visible source code alone does not guarantee security; actual safety depends on the economic incentives for thorough, ongoing review by skilled individuals. Using Bitcoin Core as a model, the article describes a successful, transparent open-source development culture built on public review and consensus. It contrasts this with the Coldcard case, where a critical bug in a lightly-reviewed, source-available library went undetected for years, highlighting a "tragedy of the commons" scenario where assumed but absent scrutiny creates vulnerability. The economics of licensing are crucial: restrictive licenses can limit the pool of motivated commercial reviewers. Finally, the article explores AI's impact. It cites the Bitcoin Red Team's use of AI to rapidly audit codebases and find vulnerabilities at scale, demonstrating a powerful new tool for security. However, AI also floods projects with low-quality code, straining maintainers. The piece concludes that in high-stakes crypto, only well-audited projects—whether open or closed-source—can withstand evolving threats, with AI both challenging and aiding security practices.

marsbitHá 7m

Coldcard Theft Reflection: Source Code Visibility Does Not Equal Security

marsbitHá 7m

Mysterious "Ox Alpha" Large Model Goes Viral with Limited-Time Free Access

A mysterious anonymous AI model named "Ox Alpha," nicknamed "Cow is Coming" by Chinese netizens, has appeared on OpenRouter, sparking widespread speculation. The model offers a 1 million token context, supports text, image, and video inputs, can call tools, and is currently free. Its standout feature is strong coding ability. Initial tests on the DeepSWE benchmark, which evaluates real-world software engineering tasks, showed an 80% pass rate on a subset of tasks, reportedly nearing top-tier code models. However, follow-up tests yielded a 63% score, with variations attributed to different task sets and configurations. The model's true developer is a major topic of debate. The prevailing theory points to Zhipu AI's unreleased GLM-5.3 Flash or its multimodal variant. Evidence cited includes identical visual token consumption patterns with GLM-5V-Turbo for videos, a consistent offset in text token counts compared to GLM-5.3, and similar behavioral traits like refusing audio processing. Zhipu has a precedent of anonymous testing. Simultaneously, another anonymous model, "korrine," appeared on Code Arena, with guesses ranging from Moonshot's Kimi K3.1 to models from Qwen or MiMo, adding to the industry's guessing game. This trend of anonymous "undercover" testing allows for unbiased performance evaluation in platforms like Arena and provides real-world, high-pressure testing through tools like OpenRouter before official release. It also serves as an effective marketing tactic, prolonging discussion through suspense. If Ox Alpha is indeed a "Flash" model, its performance raises expectations for the full-scale version's potential.

marsbitHá 4h

Mysterious "Ox Alpha" Large Model Goes Viral with Limited-Time Free Access

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
活动图片