Altcoin Selloff Hits XRP: Analysts Say Lawsuit No Longer the Key Factor

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-09-22Última atualização em 2025-09-22

Resumo

Despite weekly optimism, XRP has dropped below the $3 mark again, frustrating its community as the token falls behind broader...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Despite weekly optimism, XRP has dropped below the $3 mark again, frustrating its community as the token falls behind broader market trends. Currently, it is trading near $2.90, down more than 4% in the past 24 hours, with a market cap of around $173 billion.

Despite a historic U.S. spot XRP ETF launch and Ripple’s strengthened ties with Spain’s BBVA bank, the token has failed to sustain upward momentum.

Analysts now argue that XRP’s sluggish performance can no longer be blamed on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit, which has long been cited as a key obstacle to growth. With that case resolved, attention has shifted to deeper market dynamics.

Profit-Taking, Liquidations, and Market Sentiment

XRP’s ETF debut generated record $37 million in day-one trading volume, but it also triggered a classic “sell the news” response. Many institutional investors exited positions, sparking heavy selling pressure.

Adding to the downturn, XRP traders faced nearly $79 million in liquidations over the past day, with long positions making up the majority. This wave of forced selling drove prices down, undermining confidence among retail investors.

Meanwhile, the broader crypto market lost 4% in value, with billions wiped from altcoin capitalization. Ethereum (ETH) and other major assets also saw steep declines, further dragging XRP down.

Ripple XRP XRPUSD

XRP's price records important losses on the daily chart. Source: XRPUSD on Tradingview

Can XRP Avoid a Steeper Decline?

XRP is now battling to hold support near $2.80, with traders warning that a break lower could expose the token to the $2.50–$2.60 zone. Bulls, on the other hand, need to reclaim the $3.10–$3.20 range to re-establish momentum and revive hopes of testing the $3.65 all-time high.

Market sentiment remains mixed. Some commentators, such as analyst BarriC, suggest XRP could still surge dramatically if it follows historical patterns, even hinting at a possible $300 price target by 2026.

Others remain skeptical, pointing to continued selling pressure and tighter regulatory compliance requirements for altcoin ETFs. For now, XRP holders face a crucial test: defend current levels or risk deeper losses as the altcoin market selloff accelerates.

Cover image from ChatGPT, XRPUSD chart from Tradingview

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 2h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 2h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Há 4h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Há 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片