UAE Joins Global Crypto Tax Reporting Framework, Seeks Feedback

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-09-22Última atualização em 2025-09-22

The United Arab Emirates is preparing to roll out new global tax reporting rules for crypto. On September 20, the Ministry of Finance confirmed it has signed the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement under the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF).

The official announcement reads that the UAE plans to implement CARF in 2027, with the first exchanges of data expected in 2028. CARF, created by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2023, allows countries to automatically share information on crypto-asset activities.

The Ministry says the system will bring greater certainty to the sector while keeping the UAE aligned with global tax transparency standards.

UAE seeks feedback through public consultation

To shape how the rules are applied, the Ministry is asking for feedback from the industry. Advisory firms, exchanges, custodians, traders, and other stakeholders are invited to share their views on how the framework might affect them.

The Ministry has opened an eight-week public consultation that started on 15th September and runs until 8th November. The Ministry of Finance says that the goal is “to develop clear and effective regulatory rules informed by the insights of experts and stakeholders, and aligned with market needs.”

Reporting requirements

Under CARF, exchanges, brokers, custodians, and wallet providers will be required to collect and report data, including transactions, account balances, and customer residency information. The framework is to deter tax evasion, safeguard investors, and establish a robust reporting system.

The decision comes as the UAE continues to establish itself as a global center for digital assets. The country exempted value-added tax from crypto transactions in 2024. About the same time, Dubai established clear guidelines for Web3 businesses through the Digital Assets Law and the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA).

Also Read: Bitcoin Slips Below Support, $1.7B Wiped Out in Liquidations


Mobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 2h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 2h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Há 4h

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Há 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片