TRUMP rebounds from $8.18 support – Breakout coming?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-09-18Última atualização em 2025-09-18

Key Takeaways

What signals show strength in TRUMP’s Futures market?

Taker buy dominance reveals sustained buyer aggression, showing traders are actively absorbing supply.

What highlights TRUMP’s squeeze potential?

Short liquidations ($99.32M) far exceeded longs ($34.61M), signaling the potential for an accelerated breakout.


A smart whale secured $1.48M profits from Pump.fun [PUMP] before rotating into Official Trump [TRUMP], where unrealized gains now exceed $223K. 

Such aggressive accumulation often reshapes sentiment because whales signal confidence before broader markets react.

Traders now watch this activity closely, as one wallet’s rotation into TRUMP has already created fresh interest around its price structure and potential breakout trajectory.

Can TRUMP ignite a breakout?

TRUMP tested the upper boundary of its falling channel, a critical level that often signals breakout potential. Buyers concentrated demand around $8.18 to $8.70, creating strong support against downward pressure.

That defense produced a rebound, suggesting possible movement toward resistance targets at $10.07, $12, and even $16. Price momentum now depends on sustained buyer aggression and consistent defense of the zone.

However, if bulls maintain control, TRUMP could carve a path beyond near-term resistance. Traders now closely monitor whether the channel retest sparks decisive upward action.

Source: TradingView

Bullish conviction in TRUMP

Taker buy dominance continues to reveal strong buy-side control in TRUMP markets. Aggressive market buys outweighed sells, signaling that traders stepped in with conviction.

This persistent imbalance highlights that demand remains steady, with buyers showing no hesitation in absorbing available supply. Thus, such pressure often marks early stages of breakouts as buyers dictate direction.

With taker buy volume maintaining leadership, TRUMP now shows evidence of firm bullish intent. Sustained dominance on the buy side could provide the fuel needed for TRUMP to test higher resistance levels.

Source: CryptoQuant

Bullish pressure rises as shorts exit

Recent liquidation data paints a telling picture of sentiment shifts. Over $99.32M in shorts were liquidated compared to $34.61M in longs, reflecting pressure on bears. 

Short liquidations occur when sellers are forced to buy back, creating sudden bursts of upward momentum. Therefore, this imbalance adds fuel to bullish conditions, especially when combined with rising taker buy dominance. 

Such squeezes often mark the early stages of extended price runs, where rapid covering pushes prices higher. Hence, if this pattern continues, TRUMP could see stronger rallies toward resistance levels.

Source: CoinGlass

Is TRUMP positioned for a stronger rally ahead?

Whale-driven accumulation, demand zone resilience, and bullish liquidation pressure suggest TRUMP is primed for further upside.

The convergence of technical and on-chain signals highlights a market preparing for a potential breakout.

If resistance levels are cleared with conviction, TRUMP could shift decisively into a stronger bullish cycle. The evidence from whale actions, taker dominance, and short squeezes points toward optimism.

Share

Leituras Relacionadas

The Danger of Old Bookmarks: How an Expired Tornado Cash Domain Cost a User 1,000 ETH

A user lost over 1,010 ETH (worth millions) due to a phishing attack via an expired official domain of the Tornado Cash protocol. As reported on August 20, 2026, the domain `tornado.cash` was not renewed by the original developers amid U.S. OFAC sanctions and was subsequently registered by malicious actors. They deployed a fake frontend mimicking the legitimate Tornado Cash interface. Through this site, the attackers gained access to the user's deposit notes—the data required to withdraw funds from the protocol's pools—and drained the ETH within 12 hours. On-chain data shows the stolen funds (e.g., wallet 0xd8B356...) were withdrawn from Tornado Cash pools. However, on-chain analyst Specter cast doubt on the victim's story. He suggested the individual might be involved in illicit activity, noting that a large sum of BTC was received from a coin-mixing service (Whirlpool) and converted to ETH before being sent to the fake Tornado Cash site. The victim's explanation of urgently moving funds due to a compromised hardware wallet was questioned, as the fund trail indicated deliberate obfuscation. Specter speculated this might be a conflict between malicious actors rather than a simple phishing case. The incident highlights the danger of expired domains for major protocols, where old bookmarks can lead to compromised sites. WHOIS records show the domain was registered in March 2025. Broader analysis notes that in 2025, over $1.8 billion was lost to scams and exploits, largely through social engineering like phishing via familiar but hijacked links. This case underscores the persistent risk when a domain's legal status changes but user trust and search engine reputation remain.

cryptonews.ruHá 40m

The Danger of Old Bookmarks: How an Expired Tornado Cash Domain Cost a User 1,000 ETH

cryptonews.ruHá 40m

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ruHá 6h

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ruHá 6h

Trading

Spot
活动图片