Plasma Hires Senior Staffs After $373M Raise Ahead of Mainnet

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-09-09Última atualização em 2025-09-09

Plasma, a new blockchain built only for stablecoins, has hired three new senior leaders as it prepares for its mainnet launch.

According to the announcement on X, the company has brought in Murat Firat as head of product, Adam Jacobs as head of global payments, and Usmann Khan as head of protocol security. 

The appointments came shortly after the startup raised $373 million in a large token sale. The project is backed by well-known investor Peter Thiel, adding to its credibility in the industry.

Plasma has not shared the date for its mainnet launch, but the network is being designed with special features for stablecoins. Public documents show it will process over 1,000 transactions per second, and offer confidential transactions. It also allows custom gas tokens, and enables zero-fee transfers for USDT. 

The zero-fee transfers are possible through an in-protocol paymaster, which means people using Plasma will not need to hold its native token to send stablecoins.

The company has close ties with Tether, the issuer of USDT. Tether’s chief executive, Paolo Ardoino, is listed on the company’s cap table, while Bitfinex, where Ardoino serve as chief technology officer, led Plasma’s seed and Series A funding rounds. Other investors include USDT0 and Framework Ventures.

“We will work closely with Tether to ensure Plasma becomes a key distribution channel for the most liquid and dominant stablecoin,” Plasma founder and CEO Paul Faecks said.

Moveover, the new executives bring different experience to the project. Firat previously founded BiLira, a Turkish crypto exchange and Lira-pegged stablecoin issuer. Jacobs worked as global head of payments at FTX and later joined Canadian fintech firm Nuvei, while Khan, recognized as a top security researcher on bug-bounty platform ImmuneFi, will oversee protocol security. 

Also Read: SharpLink begins $1.5B buyback amid ETH valuation gap


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbitHá 2h

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片