Mantle loses key long-term support as selling volume surges 44%

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-06-27Última atualização em 2026-06-27

Resumo

The cryptocurrency market experienced a significant downturn, with Bitcoin dropping 8.6% and Mantle (MNT) falling sharply by 21.6%. MNT's daily trading volume surged 44%, indicating strong selling pressure. The decline was influenced by macroeconomic news, specifically a rise in the PCE price index, which triggered a broader market sell-off. Technically, Mantle lost a critical long-term support level at $0.55 on its weekly chart, confirming a bearish trend. Analysis suggests the price could drop further toward the $0.319 support level. On shorter timeframes, the bearish structure remains intact. However, with the RSI deeply oversold, a price bounce is anticipated. Traders are advised to wait for a potential rebound to the $0.526-$0.556 range to consider selling opportunities.

The crypto market has faced a tough week of trading. Since Monday, June 22, Bitcoin [BTC] has fallen 8.6%, from $65.6k to $60k. During this time, Mantle [MNT] prices have slid by 21.6%, from $0.541 to $0.416.

In the past 24 hours alone, MNT prices were down by just under 10%. The daily trading volume has increased by 44%, which indicates heightened selling activity as prices slid lower.

The Mantle price drop was influenced by Bitcoin, which in turn reacted to macro market news. Inflation was on the rise. Data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed that the personal consumption expenditures price index (PCE) was up 4.1% year-on-year in May 2026, reaching a 3-year high.

This triggered a sell-off, and long liquidations sent prices reeling lower. Mantle’s long-term price trend was bearish, and the recent losses reinforced this bias.

MNT slips below key long-term support

Source: MNT/USDT on TradingView

The 1-week chart of MNT highlighted the importance of the $0.55 support level. The buyers have defended it since early 2024. Losing this critical long-term support level meant the long-term trend was now bearish.

The RSI was at 32.7 and not yet at oversold conditions. The OBV has bounced since last July but was slowly sliding lower, too.

This week’s losses meant the altcoin is likely to drop to the $0.319 support level soon, and possibly even lower.

Traders’ call to action- Wait to sell the bounce

Source: MNT/USDT on TradingView

The 4-hour timeframe showed a bearish swing structure. The latest downward continuation signal came when the $0.506 lower low was broken on Wednesday, June 24.

The RSI was deep in oversold conditions, and the OBV’s downward moves were much more apparent than on the weekly timeframe.

This, combined with the break of the weekly support, meant that the current H4 swing move lower was over, or close to being over. A bounce is likely to commence from here, reaching the key Fibonacci retracement targets overhead.

Therefore, a bounce into the golden pocket at $0.526-$0.556 would offer a selling opportunity.


Final Summary

  • The Bitcoin price drop earlier this week spurred the heavy MNT losses as market participants sought not to endure the rocky seas.
  • Traders can wait for a price bounce toward $0.55 before selling.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what was the primary reason for the sharp decline in Mantle (MNT) and Bitcoin prices this week?

AThe primary reason was macroeconomic news showing rising inflation. Specifically, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index reached a 3-year high of 4.1% year-on-year in May 2026, triggering a market sell-off and long liquidations.

QWhat critical long-term support level did Mantle (MNT) lose, and why is this significant?

AMantle (MNT) lost the critical long-term support level at $0.55. This is significant because buyers had successfully defended this level since early 2024, and losing it confirms that the long-term trend for MNT is now bearish.

QWhat is the suggested trading strategy for MNT according to the article, and at what price target?

AThe suggested strategy is to wait for a price bounce and then sell. Traders should wait for a bounce into the 'golden pocket' Fibonacci retracement zone between $0.526 and $0.556, which would offer a selling opportunity.

QHow did Mantle's (MNT) price performance compare to Bitcoin's (BTC) during the week mentioned?

AMantle's (MNT) price drop was much more severe. While Bitcoin fell 8.6% from $65.6k to $60k, Mantle's price slid by 21.6% from $0.541 to $0.416.

QWhat two technical indicators are mentioned as supporting the bearish outlook for MNT on the weekly chart?

AThe two technical indicators mentioned are the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and the On-Balance Volume (OBV). The weekly RSI was at 32.7 (not yet oversold), and the OBV, despite a previous bounce, was slowly sliding lower, both indicating bearish momentum.

Leituras Relacionadas

IPO Imminent, OpenAI Faces Major Personnel Upheaval

OpenAI, preparing for a potential IPO, is experiencing significant leadership turmoil. In mid-August 2026, longtime "GPU geek" Scott Gray quietly left, and within three days, Chief Operating Officer Brad Lightcap (8-year veteran) and Chief Revenue Officer Denise Dresser (8-month tenure) departed. This follows a broader exodus of at least 10 senior executives in 2026, including heads of product, safety, and ethics. Analysts view this as a strategic "surgery" to transform from a research lab into a sales-driven enterprise company before going public. Revenue now tilts toward enterprise clients, surpassing consumer income sooner than expected, with annualized revenue reaching $40 billion. The new CRO, Dali Rajic, is a veteran enterprise sales leader. Concurrently, OpenAI has disbanded independent safety teams like "Preparedness," which assessed catastrophic risks, integrating their functions into core research. Critics warn this removes dedicated "brakes" on AI development. The leadership vacuum raises questions about who is the clear second-in-command after former apps CEO Fidji Simo moved to an advisory role. Co-founder Greg Brockman appears to be consolidating power. As OpenAI races against rival Anthropic ($47B annualized revenue), it faces the dual challenge of commercial execution while managing the departure of foundational technical talent and ensuring responsible AI development remains a priority.

marsbitHá 1h

IPO Imminent, OpenAI Faces Major Personnel Upheaval

marsbitHá 1h

AI Can 'Have Moods Too'! New Research from USTC: Confusion and Anxiety Make AI Work Better

The article discusses research from the University of Science and Technology of China and Oxford, revealing that allowing AI to recognize and act upon simulated "internal emotions" can significantly improve its performance. The study demonstrates a coherent pairing between specific emotional states in AI agents and their subsequent skill choices. For instance, an agent feeling curious and desirous will search for products, while one feeling confused and tense will rephrase queries. This mirrors human decision-making influenced by emotions. Statistical validation showed a 76.5% semantic consistency in these pairings. Crucially, the research challenges the traditional view of AI errors as flaws to be eliminated. It found that "bad" emotions like confusion, tension, or frustration serve as useful metacognitive signals, indicating a mismatch between the current strategy and the environment. By responding to these signals, AI can proactively adjust before a failure occurs. This is particularly effective in complex tasks prone to failure. For example, in tasks like "heating an item" and "picking up two items," success rates surged from 9.6% to 56.9% and 4.4% to 31.3%, respectively, when using the emotion-driven skill selection method (EMOTION2SKILL). The AI's "nervous" state about a closed microwave, for instance, prompted it to check and open it first, preventing failure. The article also mentions related work from Tianjin University, which embeds emotional prediction into world models (Large Emotional World Model, LEWM), significantly improving prediction accuracy in human-centric environments. Removing emotional data was found to degrade performance even in unrelated logical reasoning tasks. These studies build on earlier findings, like those from Anthropic, that identifiable emotional representations exist within large language models (LLMs). The focus is shifting from philosophical debate about AI emotion to practically harnessing these internal states as functional signals to enhance AI robustness and capability.

marsbitHá 2h

AI Can 'Have Moods Too'! New Research from USTC: Confusion and Anxiety Make AI Work Better

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片