Expert Reveals What Updated XRP ETF Filings Mean In Battle For Approval

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-08-25Última atualização em 2025-08-25

Resumo

Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart has commented on the XRP ETF amendment filings and what they could mean in terms of...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart has commented on the XRP ETF amendment filings and what they could mean in terms of a potential approval. These amendments followed the SEC’s delay of its decision on these funds till October, which is the final deadline. 

What The XRP ETF Amendment Filings Mean For Approval

In an X post, the Bloomberg analyst stated that the XRP ETF amendments have likely happened due to feedback from the SEC. He claimed that this was a good sign, although it was mostly expected. The Commission is known to provide input on these funds during the review period, similar to what happened with the Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs

Seyffart’s comment came as issuers such as Grayscale, Canary Capital, Franklin Templeton, 21Shares, Bitwise, and WisdomTree all filed amended S-1s for their respective XRP ETF funds. Market expert Nate Geraci also commented on the filings, noting that it was highly notable for the issuers to file the amendments all at the same time. He further opined that it was a “very good sign.”

It is worth noting that these amendments came just after the SEC delayed its decision on these XRP ETFs. The Commission had a deadline this month to either approve or deny the applications, but chose to extend the review process to the final deadline, which comes up in October for these funds. 

According to Bloomberg analysts James Seyffart and Eric Balchunas, there is a 95% chance that the SEC approves these funds this year. Polymarket data shows that there is an 81% chance of approval this year. Optimism is also high, seeing as the SEC and Ripple have ended their long-running legal battle. 

XRP ETF Filings Would Have Never Happened Without Judge Torres’ Ruling

In an X post, pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton said that the XRP ETF filings would likely have never happened if not for Judge Analisa Torres’ ruling that XRP itself is not a security. This came as he reminisced on how the SEC argued years back that XRP was illegal and that, because it represented the efforts of Ripple, all tokens were deemed to be unregistered securities.

Deaton noted that fast forward to today, XRP ETFs are now on their way to approval, with a final deadline coming up for Grayscale’s filing on October 18, when this potential approval could happen. Based on how things went with the Bitcoin ETFs, the legal expert remarked that the best scenario for these XRP ETFs would mean trading begins within one to five days after approval. 

Meanwhile, if the XRP ETFs follow the Ethereum ETFs approval path, it would mean that they don’t begin trading until after about two months. The SEC had initially approved the 19b-4s for the Ethereum ETFs, but didn’t approve the S-1 filings until later on, as it still wanted additional disclosures back then. 

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $3, down almost 2% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP
XRP trading at $2.94 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Leituras Relacionadas

Deforming the Transformer, LLMs Become Smarter

A new research paper proposes "Tapered Language Models (TLMs)," a method that improves large language model performance without adding any parameters. It challenges the standard Transformer design where each layer has the same number of parameters ("feed-forward network" width). Building on evidence that layers are not equally important—earlier layers handle foundational information like grammar, while later layers often reinforce existing judgments—the researchers suggest reallocating model capacity from later to earlier layers. The core idea is to make the layer width taper off monotonically from start to end, keeping total parameters and compute constant. Experiments compared linear, cosine, and sigmoid tapering curves on a 440M parameter model. The cosine curve (e.g., starting width 1.5x baseline, ending 0.5x) achieved the best result, reducing perplexity by 1.84 points compared to the uniform baseline—a significant gain at zero cost. This finding proved robust across four different model architectures (including gated attention and memory-augmented models) and at larger scales (760M and 1.3B parameters), consistently improving performance on commonsense reasoning and language modeling tasks without harming long-context retrieval ability. The work highlights a long-overlooked design dimension: optimal parameter allocation across depth. It offers a "free lever" for efficiency, potentially applicable beyond language models to vision Transformers and diffusion models. The study was conducted by researchers from Mila, Cornell University, and the University of Montreal.

marsbitHá 9m

Deforming the Transformer, LLMs Become Smarter

marsbitHá 9m

From SpaceX to Galaxy Digital: A Detailed Look at 37 New AI Companies and 7 Crypto Dark Horses Added to the Russell Indexes

On June 26th, following its annual reconstitution, the Russell US Indexes finalized their new components, with changes taking effect for market trading on June 29th. The Russell 3000 Index, representing approximately 98% of the investable US equity market, saw significant turnover. A record $334 billion was traded during Nasdaq's closing cross on reconstitution day, highlighting the massive passive fund flows tied to these benchmarks. Companies newly added to the index are set to benefit from mandatory buying by these funds. The reconstitution raised the market cap threshold between the large-cap Russell 1000 and small-cap Russell 2000 by 24% to $5.7 billion. Overall, 224 new companies entered the Russell 3000. Of these, 19 joined the Russell 1000, and 205 joined the Russell 2000, while 118 firms were removed. Notably, among the newcomers, approximately 37 are companies operating in the AI and semiconductor ecosystem, accounting for roughly 17% of new additions. The most prominent is SpaceX, which, following its recent IPO and soaring valuation, was fast-tracked directly into the Russell 1000 and Top 200 indexes. Additionally, about 7 cryptocurrency-related companies were newly included, representing about 3% of new entrants. These include Galaxy Digital, Bitmine, and Tron, among others. The inclusion of several Decentralized Autonomous Trust (DAT) entities signals the model's sustained market presence. For these smaller AI and crypto firms, index inclusion boosts visibility, potentially attracting further institutional investment and supporting their stock performance.

Odaily星球日报Há 12m

From SpaceX to Galaxy Digital: A Detailed Look at 37 New AI Companies and 7 Crypto Dark Horses Added to the Russell Indexes

Odaily星球日报Há 12m

Token Uneconomical

"Token Inefficiency" explores the rising economic burden of AI model token usage in enterprises, where escalating costs often fail to match tangible productivity gains. Major companies like Microsoft, Uber, and Meta are facing "token inefficiency"—characterized by budget overruns for tools like Claude Code with unclear returns. This inefficiency stems from supply-side factors like strategic model price hikes by leaders (e.g., Anthropic) and price increases in budget-friendly models, alongside technical waste in Agent systems through context traps, tokenizer inflation, redundant skill calls, and multi-Agent coordination overhead. A deeper demand-side challenge limits token value: their primary utility remains confined to highly digitalized domains like programming, which benefits from automatic, low-cost feedback loops. Extending tokens to physical world tasks or less digitalized industries faces the "Sim-to-Real Gap," where real-world validation is costly and slow, unlike in code compilation. The article warns that this inefficiency concentrates financial risk in mid-tier model developers, potentially fueling circular financing schemes and shadow credit bubbles. It also highlights societal externalities, as data center expansion strains local power grids and inflates utility costs for residents. To achieve a positive net token economy, the path forward requires dual efforts: technical optimizations (context compression, skill reduction, model routing, budget constraints) and business-side discipline (governance, cost attribution, ROI focus). The ultimate goal is shifting from showcasing AI capabilities to maximizing value per token, finding scalable commercial applications that justify the investment and bridge the digital-physical divide.

marsbitHá 31m

Token Uneconomical

marsbitHá 31m

Stock Price Halved in 45 Days, Is Circle Actually the "DeFi Barometer"?

Over a 45-day period, Circle's stock price plummeted by approximately 50% to around $63, coinciding with a significant $70 billion decline in the circulation of its USDC stablecoin from its peak. In contrast, Tether's USDT saw a much smaller reduction. Analyst Ed Engel posits that Circle acts as a barometer for DeFi activity, as a high correlation exists between USDC supply and ETH price movements. The vast majority of USDC is concentrated within crypto exchanges and DeFi protocols for yield generation, rather than for widespread daily use in payments or commerce, unlike USDT which has stronger real-world adoption in various regions. The recent contraction in DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL), following security incidents like the Kelp DAO attack, appears to mirror Circle's declining stock performance. While Circle is actively promoting USDC's use as a settlement asset on platforms like Hyperliquid and in institutional payment corridors—where its organic transfer volume surpasses USDT's—these efforts have not sufficiently driven growth in USDC's overall supply. The company's revenue remains heavily tied to DeFi's expansion. For Circle's investment narrative to change, it must either significantly reduce its reliance on the volatile DeFi sector or demonstrably prove that real-world adoption can substantially and sustainably increase USDC circulation. In the near term, market confidence hinges on DeFi addressing its inherent risk-reward imbalances.

marsbitHá 1h

Stock Price Halved in 45 Days, Is Circle Actually the "DeFi Barometer"?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片