Winklevoss Twins’ Gemini Files for Nasdaq IPO

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-08-15Última atualização em 2025-08-15

Gemini Space Station Inc., has reportedly filed for an initial public offering in the United States. The company plans to list on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol GEMI, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday.

The New York City-based company, owned by billionaire twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss is both a cryptocurrency exchange and a custodian. It offers a platform where users can trade and store their digital assets.

Big Numbers In Revenue this Year

According to its latest filing, Gemini has made $67.9 million in revenue in the first six months of this year, but lost $282.5 million. In the same period last year, it earned $73.5 million but lost $41.4 million.

The company holds more than $18 billion worth of customer assets. Most of its income, about 65.5%, comes from charging fees when people trade cryptocurrencies. Gemini also has other products, such as a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, services for earning interest through crypto staking, and a credit card that gives rewards in cryptocurrency. The company also caters to institutions with crypto custody and over-the-counter trading.

The Twin Power Play

Cameron Winklevoss serves as president and Tyler Winklevoss as chief executive officer. Both own at least 5% of the company’s shares. Each brother is worth about $7.5 billion, according to Bloomberg’s Billionaires Index. The IPO is being managed by Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, two large investment banks.

The decision to go public comes as more crypto companies are selling shares on the stock market. This trend has grown after the Trump administration supported new cryptocurrency laws. In June, the stablecoin company Circle Internet Group Inc. went public in a $1.2 billion IPO, and its shares jumped 168% on the first day. Earlier this week, another crypto exchange called Bullish saw its shares rise 84% after raising $1.1 billion.

Legal Issue with U.S Regulators

Meanwhile, this firm has also faced its own share of legal issues in the past. In 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission accused the company of selling unregistered securities through its Gemini Earn lending program, but those charges were dropped earlier this year.

In January, Gemini agreed to pay $5 million to settle a Commodity Futures Trading Commission lawsuit that claimed the company misled regulators while trying to launch the first U.S.-regulated Bitcoin futures contract. Gemini did not admit or deny the allegations.

Also Read: Stablecoins Could to Hit $1 Trillion by 2030: Report

Follow The Crypto Times on Google News to Stay Updated!

Leituras Relacionadas

Chainlink Adds 6,100 Wallets In Two Days In Strongest Growth Burst Of 2026

Chainlink experienced its strongest wallet growth burst of 2026, adding approximately 6,100 new addresses in just two days. This notable increase in network participation occurred despite LINK's price trading in a difficult market environment alongside other altcoins. The surge in new wallets is seen as a positive signal for user and investor interest, suggesting the ecosystem continues to attract attention even when price action is weak. Wallet growth is considered a useful metric as it measures real participation rather than just price speculation. For an infrastructure project like Chainlink, whose value is tied to oracle services, data, and real-world assets, such growth indicates ongoing engagement with its core technology. However, the article notes that this data point, while constructive, is not conclusive on its own. The nature of the new wallets—whether they belong to small holders, new users, or exchange-related entities—remains unclear. The report maintains a balanced perspective, stating that while this wallet growth is a positive adoption signal for LINK bulls, it does not guarantee a price increase. Skeptics may question whether this user growth translates into value capture for the token. The key takeaway is that this burst of activity should be monitored alongside other factors like transaction volume, price structure, and broader market trends for a more complete picture. The signal requires follow-through in price and demand to be fully validated.

bitcoinistHá 7m

Chainlink Adds 6,100 Wallets In Two Days In Strongest Growth Burst Of 2026

bitcoinistHá 7m

Dogecoin Open Interest Hovers Around $959 Million As Traders Wait For Recovery Signal

Dogecoin open interest remains around $959 million, indicating significant activity in derivatives despite slower weekend trading. This high level of exposure makes the market sensitive to sharp price moves, as leveraged positions can amplify volatility. However, open interest alone does not predict direction; traders must also watch price action, funding rates, and liquidation levels. As a sentiment-driven asset, Dogecoin's future depends on whether it can attract genuine spot buying to support high leverage. Currently, no clear recovery signal is present, but the engaged derivatives market means the next confirmed price move could be significant.

bitcoinistHá 52m

Dogecoin Open Interest Hovers Around $959 Million As Traders Wait For Recovery Signal

bitcoinistHá 52m

Grant Cardone raises Bitcoin holdings to 2,700 BTC – Why now?

Grant Cardone's firm Cardone Capital increased its Bitcoin holdings to approximately 2,700 BTC, purchased at an average of $59,000, amid a market downturn. This accumulation contrasts with actions from MicroStrategy, the largest corporate holder, which recently authorized selling up to $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin after its first-ever sale in June. The broader market also saw significant selling pressure, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experiencing a record net outflow of roughly $4.06 billion in June. However, technical analysis using Bollinger Bands on the weekly chart suggests Bitcoin may have reached a potential bottom, as the price touched the lower band—a historical support level.

ambcryptoHá 1h

Grant Cardone raises Bitcoin holdings to 2,700 BTC – Why now?

ambcryptoHá 1h

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbitHá 1h

marsbitHá 1h

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手Há 1h

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?