LDO单周大涨60%+,ETH系“太子”终于要价值发现了?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2025-08-11Última atualização em 2025-08-11

Resumo

在当前宏观及微观的双重刺激下,LDO 终于有了一些趋势扭转的迹象,这会是这位 ETH “太子”价格发现的开始吗?当前下判断还太早,但多少是看到了一些希望。


原创 | Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina
作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth


流动性质押赛道的龙头 Lido(LDO)近期终于硬起来了。OKX 行情显示,截至北京时间 8 月 11 日 10:00,LDO 暂报 1.52 USDT,24 小时涨幅 14.21%,过去一周涨幅更是高达 64.5%。


作为以太坊生态规模最大的流动性质押协议,Lido 曾长期霸占以太坊生态乃至整个链上生态的总锁仓价值(TVL)榜首之位,尽管近期已被借 USDe 系资产循环贷之势高速增长的 Aave 反超,但 Lido 依旧是整个以太坊生态话语权最重的协议之一。


关于 LDO 近期的上涨逻辑,大体上可以归因为宏观及微观两个层面。


宏观:监管明确属性,质押型 ETF 推进


首先是宏观层面,8 月 6 日,美国证券交易委员会正式发布关于流动性质押活动声明《Statement on Certain Liquid Staking Activities》,其中明确指出:与协议质押相关的“流动性质押活动”不涉及证券发行和出售,除非存入的涵盖加密资产是投资合同的一部分或受投资合同的约束。流动性质押活动的参与者无需根据《证券法》向美国证券交易委员会注册交易,也无需符合《证券法》关于这些流动性质押活动的注册豁免规定。


2024 年 6 月,彼时仍是 Gary Gensler 掌舵的 SEC 曾指控 Lido 及 Rocket Pool 等流动性质押项目属于证券,当日 LDO 受此利空影响曾大跌超 10%,并在随后较长一段时间内持续处于颓势。而仅仅一年之后,新一届 SEC 的此项声明则明确了其业务模式不涉及证券属性,等于是在监管层面为此类项目的后续运营及发展松了绑。


除了监管层面的转向外,近期围绕着质押赛道的另一项关键进展是贝莱德已向 SEC 提交在其现货以太坊 ETF 中引入质押机制的申请,虽然此申请仍在审议之中,但结合 SEC 的态度来看预期获批并不会太困难。市场已普遍预期随着质押 ETF 的通过,当前在以太坊质押份额中占比近 25% 的 Lido 有望获得一定的业务提振及资金追逐。


微观:LDO 回购计划终于摆上台了


相较于宏观层面的间接影响,近期关于 LDO 回购计划的讨论或许才是短期内影响币价走势的直接因素。


8 月 7 日,Lido 社区成员 Kuzmich 于治理论坛提交了一份关于“LDO 回购计划”的草案。草案提到,Lido 财库目前持有价值 1.45 亿美元的流动性资产(1700 万 USDC、1190 万 USDT、1220 DAI、28640 stETH),但这些资产并未为协议创造收益。


草案建议,Lido 应基于财库余额动态执行 LDO 回购,从而改善协议资金利用模式,提振 LDO 价格,进而恢复市场对 LDO 价值的信心。具体而言,草案建议在当前的财库储备规模下,70% 的流动性资产用于定期 LDO 回购,30% 则留存国库,用于运营和战略需求;当财库流动性资产降低至 5000 万至 8500 万美元之间,比例将调整为 50% 回购 / 50% 留存;当财库流动性资产低于 5000 万美元时,比例将调整为 0% 回购 / 100% 留存(暂停回购直至恢复阈值)。


根据 Lido 治理论坛的规划,如若顺利,该草案将在 8 月 7 日至 14 日期间在论坛内收集社区反馈;之后在 8 月 14 日的 Lido 代币持有者电话会议中讨论;再然后于 8 月 15 日至 24 日期间根据反馈修订提案;最终在 8 月 25 日提交 Snapshot 进行投票。


虽然当前在社区论坛内部存在着一定的反对声音,但除了少部分坚持认为“回购只是短期游戏”的社区成员之外,多数用户质疑的点都集中在该计划的具体细节之上,比如未明确回购之后的代币是否销毁,再比如回购的开启方式及执行方式仍不够明确等等。


考虑到当前该草案仍处于早期阶段,预计后期还会在电话会议讨论后进一步修改细节,再加之近期 LDO 价格罕见地出现了较强势的上行,乐观预期该草案或是基于该草案讨论衍生出的其他回购计划将会得到一定规模的社区支持。


ETH 系“太子”,终于要价值发现了吗?


作为公认为 ETH 系 Beta 之一,LDO 过往较长一段时间的表现可以说是很难让人满意。
在 AAVE 借回购之势快速上冲至 300 美元上方;ENA 借业务飞轮及财库计划狂飙突进(详见《一周上涨近 50%,ENA 会是 ETH 最大的 Beta 吗?》);PENDLE 凭借 Boros 打开了新的想象力空间之际(详见《资金费率终成可交易资产,Pendle 子平台 Boros 如何颠覆套利市场?》),LDO 却长期处于一个相对疲软的状态之中,即便“质押型 ETF”的预期喊了许久,但始终未能在一个相对较长的周期内推动 LDO 的价格表现。


在当前宏观及微观的双重刺激下,LDO 终于有了一些趋势扭转的迹象,这会是这位 ETH “太子”价格发现的开始吗?当前下判断还太早,但多少是看到了一些希望。

Leituras Relacionadas

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手Há 2h

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手Há 2h

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbitHá 3h

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbitHá 3h

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbitHá 3h

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbitHá 3h

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbitHá 5h

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbitHá 5h

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

Cognition AI, the company behind the AI programmer "Devin," has raised over $1 billion in new funding at a valuation of $26 billion, just eight months after reaching a $10.2 billion valuation. The round was led by Lux Capital, General Catalyst, and 8VC. Founded by three young Chinese entrepreneurs with strong competitive programming backgrounds, Cognition initially gained fame with Devin, marketed as the world's first AI software engineer capable of handling tasks from start to finish. While its early demos were impressive, real-world usage revealed reliability and cost-effectiveness issues, leading to a significant price cut for Devin in 2025. A pivotal moment came when Cognition acquired the assets of AI IDE company Windsurf after a failed acquisition by OpenAI. This move gave Cognition a crucial developer-facing tool, allowing it to pursue a two-pronged strategy: Devin for autonomous task execution and Windsurf for integrated, collaborative coding within an IDE. This shift helped the company move away from the controversial "AI replacement" narrative towards a model of augmenting human engineers, particularly for repetitive or maintenance tasks. This strategic pivot is backed by strong commercial metrics. The company reports a 10x increase in enterprise usage this year, with an annual revenue run-rate of $492 million and a 50% month-over-month growth in enterprise Devin usage over the past six months. Its client list now includes major corporations like Goldman Sachs and Mercedes-Benz, as well as government agencies like NASA and the U.S. Army. Investors are betting on Cognition becoming a foundational piece of next-generation software engineering infrastructure, positioning it at the center of a hybrid future where AI agents and human developers work in tandem.

marsbitHá 5h

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar LDO

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Lido (LDO) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Lido (LDO) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Lido (LDO)Depois de comprar o teu Lido (LDO), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Lido (LDO)Transaciona facilmente Lido (LDO) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

308 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar LDO

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de LDO (LDO) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片