PancakeSwap: After failed breakout, Will CAKE trap late bears with bounce to $2.95?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-08-03Última atualização em 2025-08-04

Key Takeaways

PancakeSwap failed to breakout past the 7-month range, and the price action following the rejection showed that bears were dominant. Despite this, a price bounce to $2.7 or even $2.95 was possible.


PancakeSwap [CAKE] saw a 2.83% price bounce on Sunday, the 3rd of August. However, its short-term trend was bearish after the failed breakout past $2.95 toward the end of July.

This failure saw the price retrace back into the range that is just over 7 months old.

The native token of the decentralized exchange on the BNB Smart Chain did not inspire bullish confidence, even though it was trading at the $2.55 support zone.

Bitcoin [BTC] appeared to have found some buying pressure at the $112k mark, but it was unclear if it could begin a recovery.

Bitcoin’s price movement in the coming days would likely influence CAKE’s trajectory, which at press time appears bearish.

Sellers are in the driving seat

CAKE 1-day ChartCAKE 1-day Chart

Source: CAKE/USDT on TradingView

CAKE dropped below the swing low it made on the 1-day timeframe on the 24th of July. This move below $2.535 (white) signified a bearish market structure break.

It signaled further losses were likely, although a price drop might or might not be imminent.

The A/D indicator also made a new low compare to the past two months to underline heavy selling pressure in recent days. The MACD made a bearish crossover to capture the shift in momentum in favor of the sellers.

CAKE 4-hour ChartCAKE 4-hour Chart

Source: CAKE/USDT on TradingView

A deeper price drop might not be imminent because the $2.55 level marked the 25% level of the 7-month range.

As such, it was a relatively notable support level, and has given PancakeSwap traders a bounce over the past 24 hours.

However, the trading volume has been dwindling over the past 48 hours. The market structure on the H4 chart was also bearish, although a move past $2.67 could usher short-term gains.

CAKE Liquidation HeatmapCAKE Liquidation Heatmap

Source: CoinGlass

The liquidation heatmap showed a good chance of a price move toward $2.7. The price bounced from the liquidity cluster at $2.5 over the weekend, and was close to the magnetic zones at $2.7 and $2.8.

Further north, the $2.95 and $3.05 levels were the next resistances to watch. At press time, the technical indicators and the price action did not suggest a price move beyond $2.6 could materialize.

If it does, traders need to beware a larger price bounce, even though the 1-day market structure was bearish.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Share

Leituras Relacionadas

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbitHá 1h

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbitHá 1h

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbitHá 1h

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbitHá 1h

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手Há 1h

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片