“官办”平台涌现,后Pump时代都在炒什么概念?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2025-07-07Última atualização em 2025-07-07

Resumo

代币概念无主线,官方多次背书成核心要素。

原创 | Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|南枳(@Assassin_Malvo

“官办”平台涌现,后Pump时代都在炒什么概念?

自 USELESS 再度突破 1 亿市值以来,LetsBonk 平台迎来了第二春,连续有多个代币突破千万美元市值,在 BONK 之后, Jupiter、Moonshot 等背景雄厚的项目近期也各自推出了其 Launchpad。与以往 Pump 类仿盘火爆数日后即归于平静不同,LetsBonk 数据全面反超 Pump,Jupiter、Moonshot 等平台也诞生了各自的千万市值龙头。

与此同时,Pump.fun 即将发币的传闻甚嚣尘上,部分社区用户认为 Pump 发币即巅峰,发币后将开始走下坡路,新平台、新代币将接管 Solana Meme 生态。

Odaily 此前文章《发币量首超 Pump.fun,Letsbonk.fun 上有什么?》已对 LetsBONK 平台和头部三个代币进行了详实解读,本文将关注 LetsBONK 上其他热门代币,以及其他平台的头部代币,对其概念和背景故事进行梳理。

“官办”平台涌现,后Pump时代都在炒什么概念?

LetsBonk

  • Bluechip:纯 Meme,多外文 KOL 喊单,持仓地址中多个 USELESS 大户。

  • NYLA:AI Agent,与此前的 DeFAI 概念类似,包括 Swap、转账等功能。

  • LuckyCoin:Bonkfun 创始人 Tom 常用中文回复社群用户,并表示对中文社群的关注,其部分关键词被提取为 Meme,其中祝好运、你好等词多次提及,因此 LuckyCoin(祝你好运)成为 BONK 中文词龙头之一。

  • Glonk:喜剧演员Ricky Gervais所发布的一张图片, 5 月 15 日因受到 Bonk Guy 明牌支持和买入而大幅上涨,其支持原文为:https://x.com/theunipcs/status/1922769298990289140

  • Gib:BONK核心贡献者@iamkadense推荐,称其为 BONK 版本的 PEPE,相关推文受到 BonkGuy 回复支持。

  • Bap:纯 Meme,猫版 Bonk(BONK 原生的 Meme 概念为 Cheems 拿棒子敲人,Bap 则为猫版攻击形象)。

“官办”平台涌现,后Pump时代都在炒什么概念?

  • Baobao:BONK 关联形象,起源于官方 Instagram 发了图并配文“BaoBao 是 BONK 的弟弟,也是最好的朋友”。

“官办”平台涌现,后Pump时代都在炒什么概念?

  • 旺财:微信狗头形象,第一波为国人推广,获得 BonkGuy 回复后再次大幅上涨。

Moonshot

  • Mooncat:原为社区推广代币,第一轮市值自 200 万下跌至 50 万美元,因今日凌晨 12 时 Moonshot官方推广而重新上涨,今日早间官方对代币进行了 verified(即 Moonshot 的上币),正式成为龙一。

“官办”平台涌现,后Pump时代都在炒什么概念?

  • MonkeyPhone:Moonshot 平台第一个代币,在平台发射前已被提前发现,Moonshot 官方公布 Launchpad 后市值一度上涨至 1400 万美元,被 Rich 反超后一路下跌至当前的 300 万美元。

Jupiter

  • Uranus:Jupiter 为八大行星中的木星,而 Uranus 则为天王星,此外代币图片配合名称的寓意实际为“uranus=ur anus=你的 asshole”,为当前外文区最热门的题材。同时 Jupiter 官方账号还专门引用了 Musk 2024 年一篇提到 Uranus 的推文为其背书。

  • Kirby:纯 Meme,上涨动力主要来自官方多次提及。

“官办”平台涌现,后Pump时代都在炒什么概念?

  • MSTR 2 (MacroStrategy):代币官方锁仓 69% 代币,将在 450 天内逐步解锁用于购买代币化的 MicroStrategy 股权(MSTRx),代币发行方疑似与 JUP 官方人员@kashdhanda 存在关联。

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 5h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片