X 平台大规模封禁加密账号，多位华语大 V 中招

深潮Publicado em 2025-06-12Última atualização em 2025-06-12

平台尚未给出明确解释，社区讨论仍在发酵。

撰文：ChandlerZ，Foresight News

6 月 12 日，X（原 Twitter）突发大规模封号事件，波及众多加密领域的 KOL 和项目官方账号。此次行动引发社区广泛关注，中文圈与英文圈均有不少活跃账号被波及，其中包括 GMGN 官方账号与创始人、杀破狼、王小二、巫师、ElizaOS 团队等。

不少用户最初以为事件仅针对 GMGN，目前，被封账号正陆续进行申诉，但平台尚未给出明确解释，社区讨论仍在发酵。

被封账号集中爆发，不只是 GMGN 体系

GMGN 联合创始人 Haze 今日通过 Telegram 频道回应，目前尚未收到官方封号解释，团队正与 X 平台沟通申诉，争取尽快恢复账号。此次事件并非首次出现平台清理行为，但事发突然且找不到缘由，也让不少 KOL 对平台内容监管机制产生疑虑。

这次被封禁的账号中，中文圈有多个社区熟知的名字，包括：

  • GMGN 官方账号 @gmgnai 与创始人鸡哥 @haze0x

  • 杀破狼 @Wolfy_XBT

  • 王小二 @brc20niubi

  • 巫师 @0xCryptoWizard

  • gake @Ga__ke

与此同时，英文圈也出现类似情况。Meme 项目 ElizaOS 的官方账号 @elizaOS 与创始人 @shawmakesmagic 昨日被冻结，部分与 TRUMP 钱包有关联的账号也一度被封后解封。

尽管 GMGN 最先被注意到，但被波及的账号并不限于一个项目体系。KOL Kuai Dong（@_FORAB）称，从账号行为来看，这些 KOL 普遍具备几个共通点：

  • 多数近期活跃于 AI Agent、Meme 相关话题

  • 曾频繁提及或互动过 ai16z、ElizaOS 等关键词

  • 与 GMGN 团队成员或话题存在互动记录

  • 有部分账号近期粉丝量激增，内容发布密度高，疑似被系统识别为操纵性传播

这说明，平台此次封号行为更可能是基于行为模式的批量识别，而非针对特定团队或语言区用户。

舆论发酵中的猜测与误解：恐慌、商战、甚至「被端」

此次事件迅速引发中文社区恐慌。有人甚至在 Telegram 和微信群中声称「项目方在深圳被一锅端」，并将事件归因于某种线下执法行为。

然而从逻辑上看，这类说法基本站不住脚。X 平台作为美国公司，其风控机制依赖平台自身的内容算法与信号模型，与中国本地执法机关没有直接信息通道。封号本质上仍是平台方行为，而非外部干预所致。也有人推测这是同行发起的商战行为，通过集中举报触发 X 平台风控机制，从而达成竞争目的。这一说法暂无法证实。甚至流传一种认为，这次事件与一个带有「特朗普与马斯克言」暗示的政治 Meme 有关，部分被封账号曾发布或转发了这张图。

这一说法听上去有一定的逻辑链，但仔细观察后便会发现被封账号中，有相当一部分并未发布该 Meme，且发过相似内容但账号活跃度较低的小号，大多并未被处理，而其他大量分享政治类 Meme 的账号并未受到影响。由此可见，将封号归因于单个图像或特定内容，显然解释力不足。更大的可能，是该 Meme 恰好出现于被系统关注的一批账号之中，但并不是主因。

实际上类似情况在此前 NFT 高峰期。2021 年也曾发生过，许多拥有数十万甚至上百万粉丝的知名加密货币分析师、交易员和 KOL 的账户在没有任何事先警告的情况下被突然暂停，包括 PlanB (@100trillionUSD), Willy Woo (@woonomic), @TheCryptoDog, @woj.eth 等。其中一些账户是永久封禁，但很多在社区引起巨大反响后被恢复了。

账号被封了怎么办？

根据 Kuai Dong 的经验，之前也有过类似的情况，当时不少机构和媒体们的账号同时间段被封，但后陆续都恢复了，所以分享下那时的经验。

路径一：申诉。直接发起申诉，告知其因为在内地，经常需要梯子才能访问推特，加上多同事运营，所以 IP 变动频繁，多申诉解释清楚。

路径二：找区域经理。部分国家和地区，比如美国、日本，都是推特在当地占有率很高的地方，这里通常也有专门负责的业务、广告投放经理。根据走过这条通道朋友的透露，他们可以帮查明原因，并加速处理申诉的审批，但这条通道仅适用于公司型账号，不适用于个人。而没有负责人的地区，通常也有当地的 4A 广告公司，帮推特进行代理，它们也可以帮客户联系。

路径三：等待自然恢复。也有部分，比如之前的媒体 PANews，多次走以上路径未果，然后一年之后，神奇的解封了。

而这种例子，还有无数个，通常 3 个月 - 1 年期间不等，但这期间创建小号，也可能存在继续被封的情况。

内容创作者如何自保

在没有官方说明的情况下，创作者和项目方该如何自保？目前，行业内流传一些实用的规避建议：

  • 避免在短期内重复发布合约地址、交易链接

特别是新发项目、未审计合约、炒作属性强的 Meme 类资产，容易触发风控系统。

  • 不要刷屏式发布与热点标签高度重合的内容

如连续发文提及 「AI Agent」、「CA」、「airdrop」、「meme season」等关键词，可能被识别为操控行为。

  • 减少对单一账号、项目的集中互动

包括集中转发、评论、点赞某个 KOL 的推文，这类「群体联动」行为在 X 的新算法中属于高风险模式。

对大多数内容创作者而言，X 平台依然是最重要的流量阵地之一。但在 AI 驱动的内容审核机制下，一些以往可行的「高频投放」策略，如今已变成高风险行为。

Leituras Relacionadas

After outpacing Bitcoin, can LUNC sustain its latest price rally?

Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) recently posted strong double-digit gains, outperforming Bitcoin and the broader crypto market. However, the sustainability of this rally is in question due to several concerning signals. Key indicators of retail interest, such as Google Search Trends and Community Sentiment, have fallen significantly, suggesting waning curiosity and a drop in bullish outlook among investors. More critically, capital has been flowing out of LUNC on both the spot and perpetual markets, with notable outflows recorded over multiple timeframes. This combination of declining retail interest and capital flight indicates that the asset lacks a strong foundation to support further upward momentum, putting the current price rally at risk of a reversal in the near term.

ambcryptoHá 35m

After outpacing Bitcoin, can LUNC sustain its latest price rally?

ambcryptoHá 35m

Internet Capital Markets 2026: The US Structural Shift and the Strategic Window for Asian Institutions

The article outlines the transformative evolution of the crypto industry into a mature, regulated phase, ultimately converging toward an "Internet Capital Markets" (ICM) model. ICM envisions a fully integrated, public blockchain-based system for asset issuance, trading, and settlement, replacing legacy financial infrastructure with atomic, T+0 settlement to eliminate significant hidden costs. The piece positions Solana as a leading technical and institutional foundation for this transition. It details active U.S. institutional adoption across four key areas: banking & capital markets (e.g., J.P. Morgan's commercial paper, State Street's treasury fund), payments & stablecoins (e.g., Western Union, Fiserv), tokenized real-world assets (e.g., Apollo, Figure), and infrastructure diffusion, highlighting network effects. A clear U.S. regulatory progression is noted, including the GENIUS Act and digital commodity classifications, though gaps remain for areas like DEXs and public stock trading. For Asian financial institutions, the article presents a strategic framework categorizing markets as "Executable," "Transitional," or "Exploratory," advising fast-follower strategies to leverage established U.S. infrastructure and regulatory precedents. It concludes that the window for strategic entry is open but its duration is uncertain.

marsbitHá 54m

Internet Capital Markets 2026: The US Structural Shift and the Strategic Window for Asian Institutions

marsbitHá 54m

‘Halt is not okay’ – All about Base and its consensus problem

Base, a Coinbase-incubated Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) network, experienced a significant consensus issue for nearly 48 hours, halting deposit and withdrawal functions. The problem began on June 25th when an invalid block was sequenced, leading to "unhealthy" mainnet block production. While withdrawals were partially degraded, deposits faced a "major outage." Base co-founder Jesse Pollak assured users that all funds were safe but emphasized that such a chain halt is unacceptable, vowing to improve the platform's reliability for 24/7 global finance. This disruption occurs as Base aims to expand into tokenized asset lending and borrowing, despite having achieved substantial growth with over $184M in cumulative revenue and $4B in Total Value Locked (TVL). The incident's impact on user confidence remains to be seen.

ambcryptoHá 1h

‘Halt is not okay’ – All about Base and its consensus problem

ambcryptoHá 1h

Mantle loses key long-term support as selling volume surges 44%

The cryptocurrency market experienced a significant downturn, with Bitcoin dropping 8.6% and Mantle (MNT) falling sharply by 21.6%. MNT's daily trading volume surged 44%, indicating strong selling pressure. The decline was influenced by macroeconomic news, specifically a rise in the PCE price index, which triggered a broader market sell-off. Technically, Mantle lost a critical long-term support level at $0.55 on its weekly chart, confirming a bearish trend. Analysis suggests the price could drop further toward the $0.319 support level. On shorter timeframes, the bearish structure remains intact. However, with the RSI deeply oversold, a price bounce is anticipated. Traders are advised to wait for a potential rebound to the $0.526-$0.556 range to consider selling opportunities.

ambcryptoHá 3h

Mantle loses key long-term support as selling volume surges 44%

ambcryptoHá 3h

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbitHá 3h

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow