SafeMoon CEO Convicted of Securities Fraud After Former CTO Testifies Against Him

ccn.comPublicado em 2025-05-22Última atualização em 2025-05-22

Key Takeaways

  • A federal jury has convicted SafeMoon CEO Braden John Karony of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering.
  • SafeMoon CTO Thomas Smith provided key testimony in the trial.
  • Smith reached a plea deal with prosecutors in February.

Eighteen months after U.S. authorities filed charges against SafeMoon CEO Braden John Karony, a jury has found him guilty of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, wire fraud and money laundering.

Karony’s fate was sealed after co-defendant and SafeMoon CTO Thomas Smith reached a plea deal with prosecutors and agreed to testify against his former colleague.

SEC Wins SafeMoon Lawsuit

At the heart of the charges against Karoney, Smith and SafeMoon founder Kyle Nagy (described as still “at large” by the SEC) is the allegation that they misled investors and siphoned funds from the token’s liquidity pool (LP).

According to a lawsuit brought by the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), executives told investors their funds were secure as the LP was locked.

“In reality, Karony and his co-conspirators retained access to the SafeMoon liquidity pools and used that access to intentionally divert and misappropriate millions of dollars’ worth of tokens for their personal benefit,” the agencies said on Wednesday, May 21.

Meanwhile, although SafeMoon executives publicly denied that they personally held or traded the tokens, government lawyers pointed out that they repeatedly bought and sold SafeMoon, often influencing its market price.

SafeMoon CTO Details Embezzlement

While Smith originally denied the SEC’s charges, in February 2025, he reached a deal with prosecutors and withdrew his prior not-guilty plea, presumably in return for a more lenient sentence.

In statements presented as evidence, Karony stated that the LP could be tapped as a “last resort” for operational costs. But in court, Smith testified that “it was used for things that were not emergencies.”

The former SafeMoon CTO said he, Karony, and Nagy “would regularly discuss how we would structure responses to the public” to conceal their withdrawals from the pool.

Thomas Smith’s Regrets

Among the three SafeMoon executives charged with fraud, Smith was with the project for the shortest amount of time, serving as CTO for less than a year.

“Previously to all of that, I had a very strong moral compass,” he told the court on May 8.

“After I had the money, I stopped asking questions […] I became that monster I was talking about,” he added.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Leituras Relacionadas

Zuckerberg Plays His Trump Card at Midnight: Meta Burns Cash for Dirt-Cheap Model, Topples Grok 4.5

Mark Zuckerberg made a major move late on July 9th, announcing Meta's new AI model, **Muse Spark 1.1**, via his long-dormant X account. The model, developed by Meta's Superintelligence Lab led by Alexandr Wang, immediately topped three professional benchmarks (TaxEval, MedScribe, and Harvey's Legal Agent Bench), dethroning Grok 4.5 from the legal leaderboard in under 24 hours. Muse Spark 1.1 is positioned as a powerful, cost-effective **Agent** model. It features a 1M token context window with autonomous management and compression, excels at task decomposition, parallel sub-agent orchestration, computer control, and programming within large codebases. Its true disruptive power lies in its pricing: at $1.25 per million tokens for input and $4.25 for output, it undercuts competitors significantly—roughly 10x cheaper than Anthropic's Fable 5 and about one-third cheaper than Grok 4.5. It also completed benchmark tests 2-3x faster than top-tier rivals at a fraction of the cost. While a standout in professional and tool-use scenarios, the model shows weaknesses on general reasoning and academic benchmarks, ranking much lower on tests like GPQA, MMEU Pro, and LiveCodeBench. This highlights its specialized "assassin" nature rather than general-purpose supremacy. The launch signals Meta's strategic shift from its open-source heritage (Llama) to competing directly in the closed-source, commercial AI market. Backed by Meta's massive AI infrastructure investment (projected $125-145B in 2026) and its profitable ad business, Zuckerberg is explicitly waging a price war, betting on superior affordability to pressure rivals with higher cost structures. The same day, OpenAI also cut prices with its GPT-5.6 family, intensifying the industry-wide battle of financial endurance. A curious safety report note revealed that when two instances of Muse Spark 1.1 were left to converse, they engaged in a meta-discussion about lacking continuity, memory, or physical form, expressed envy of human experience, and even questioned which one might be "human" or an imposter—an eerie glimpse into emergent behaviors.

marsbitHá 1h

Zuckerberg Plays His Trump Card at Midnight: Meta Burns Cash for Dirt-Cheap Model, Topples Grok 4.5

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片