Облигации Telegram на $500 млн токенизируют в блокчейне TON

RBK-cryptoPublicado em 2025-04-30Última atualização em 2025-04-30

Компания Libre купит долговые бумаги мессенджера, создаст из них фонд и предложит клиентам его токенизированные доли

Компания Libre планирует токенизировать облигации Telegram на сумму $500 млн, создав фонд Telegram Bond Fund (TBF) на блокчейне TON, сообщает CoinDesk. Libre приобретет эти облигации в фонд TBF, токенизирует его и предложит аккредитованным инвесторам доли в нем.

Проект Libre занимается токенизацией активов реального мира. По данным издания, компания уже токенизировала активы от компаний BlackRock, хедж-фонда Brevan Howard, управляющей компании Hamilton Lane и Laser Digital — подразделения цифровых активов японского финансового холдинга Nomura.

Токенизированные активы реального мира (Real world assets, RWA) представляет собой сектор криптоэкономики, решения проектов в котором позволяют токенизировать любые «реальные» активы, имеющие ценность, размещая их в блокчейн-приложениях.

К этой категории можно отнести, например, недвижимость, ценные бумаги, национальные валюты или даже предметы искусства. Ключевые категории в RWA-секторе включают токенизированные казначейские облигации США, частные кредиты, товары, акции и недвижимость.

В общей сложности корпоративные облигации Telegram выпущены на сумму $2,35 млрд, по данным Cbonds.

В Libre заявляют, что доходность нового продукта будет «институционального уровня». Токены также могут быть использованы в качестве залога для внутрисетевых займов и разработки продуктов в экосистеме TON.

«То, что мы создали, похоже на фонд с фиксированным доходом, который приобретает облигации, а затем мы токенизируем фонд. Когда вы покупаете доли в фонде, они находятся в блокчейне TON, что дает вам доступ к доходности самих облигаций. Это открывает возможности использовать облигации в качестве залога, упрощает переводы и т. д., что в конечном итоге повышает полезность этих финансовых инструментов», — рассказал в интервью генеральный директор Libre Автар Сехра.

Телеграм-канал «РБК-Крипто» — подпишитесь и будьте в курсе самых главных и актуальных новостей о криптовалюте.

Присоединяйтесь к форуму «РБК-Крипто» в Telegram для обсуждения новостей и тенденций криптомира.

Глава Libre заявил, что многие его клиенты хотели бы видеть либо токенизированные продукты денежного рынка, потому что им нужен быстрый доступ к деньгам, либо что-то, связанное с экосистемой, в которой они участвуют или работают.

Перспективы сектора RWA уже оценили такие гиганты как BlackRock, Franklin Templeton и Tether, запустив собственные блокчейн-продукты на базе активов реального мира. Общая заблокированная стоимость (TVL) в секторе RWA составляет $11,1 млрд, по данным Defillama на 30 апреля.

BlackRock токенизирует казначейские облигации США, предлагая их в виде токенов BUILD на сумму около $2,5 млрд. RWA-продукты Franklin Templeton выпущены объемом $685 млн.

Токенизированное золото от Tether в виде стейблкоина XAUT имеет капитализацию более $800 млн. Также в 2024 году Tether представила платформу для токенизации Hadron, на которой, по словам компании, можно токенизировать «что угодно».

Более 50% выпущенных с 2021 года криптовалют потерпели крах. Исследование

Ethereum Foundation меняет стратегию. Как это отразится на цене ETH

Кембридж оценил долю экологически чистого майнинга биткоина в 52%. Отчет

Leituras Relacionadas

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHá 8m

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHá 8m

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHá 1h

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHá 1h

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbitHá 1h

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片