Более 50% выпущенных с 2021 года криптовалют потерпели крах. Исследование

RBK-cryptoPublicado em 2025-04-30Última atualização em 2025-04-30

Почти половина из провалившихся криптовалютных проектов, запущенных на децентрализованных биржах, потерпели крах в этом году

Более 50% всех криптовалют, выпущенных за последние несколько лет на децентрализованных биржах (DEX), потерпели неудачу, согласно новому отчету CoinGecko. Из почти 7 млн криптовалют, зарегистрированных на портале GeckoTerminal с 2021 года, 3,7 млн перестали торговаться и считаются провальными.

Количество провальных криптовалют 2021-2025. Источник: coingecko.com/research

GeckoTerminal — это инструмент портала CoinGecko для отслеживания торговли криптовалютами на децентрализованных криптобиржах (DEX) в режиме реального времени.

rbc.group

Точная цифра, указанная в отчете, — 52,7%, причем большинство из этих монет потерпели неудачу в 2024 году и в начале 2025 года. Тревожно то, что только в первом квартале 2025 года обанкротилось 1,8 млн токенов, что составляет 49,7% от всех зарегистрированных случаев банкротства проектов, говорится в отчете.

Авторы исследования считают, что такое резкое снижение выживаемости токенов может быть связано с общей нестабильностью рынка, особенно после инаугурации президента США Дональда Трампа в январе 2025 года.

Общее количество криптовалютных проектов также резко возросло. В 2021 году на портале было зарегистрировано 428 383 проекта. К 2025 году это число выросло почти до 7 млн проектов. Во многом такой скачок исследователи объясняют открытием платформы для создания мемкоинов pump.fun, который упростил процесс выпуска токенов. Это привело к появлению на рынке множества мемных монет и проектов, созданных с минимальными усилиями, говорится в отчете.

Телеграм-канал «РБК-Крипто» — подпишитесь и будьте в курсе самых главных и актуальных новостей о криптовалюте.

Присоединяйтесь к форуму «РБК-Крипто» в Telegram для обсуждения новостей и тенденций криптомира.

В 2024 году было запущено наибольшее количество проектов — более 3 млн. В том же году потерпели неудачу почти 1,4 млн проектов, что составляет 37,7% от всех неудачных запусков за последние годы.

До запуска pump.fun в 2024 году количество неудачных криптовалютных проектов исчислялось шестизначным числом. Провалы проектов в период с 2021 по 2023 год составили всего 12,6% от общего числа.

Три миллиона токенов. Почему мемкоины наводнили крипторынок в 2024 году

В этом исследовании взяли в расчет общее количество монет и токенов, которые когда-то были зарегистрированы на GeckoTerminal, но больше не торгуются. Их сгруппировали по годам, когда они в последний раз активно торговались. Данные были собраны в период с 1 июля 2021 года по 31 марта 2025 года. Учитывались только токены, которые были проданы один или несколько раз до того, как прекратили свое существование.

Кембридж оценил долю экологически чистого майнинга биткоина в 52%. Отчет

Под Иркутском задержали нанесших ущерб на 200 млн руб. майнеров

Объемы торгов мемкоином TRUMP выросли на тысячи процентов. Но курс упал

Leituras Relacionadas

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHá 9m

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHá 9m

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinistHá 1h

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHá 1h

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHá 1h

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbitHá 1h

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbitHá 1h

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

Weekly Token Unlocks: XPL and SoSoValue Tokens Worth Over $10 Million Set for Release This week sees significant token unlocks for two projects. SoSoValue, an AI-powered crypto investment research platform, will unlock 13.03 million tokens, valued at approximately $3.87 million. The project aims to merge CeFi efficiency with DeFi transparency. Separately, Plasma, a Layer 1 blockchain designed for global stablecoin payments, will unlock 110 million tokens worth about $10.42 million. The network focuses on high throughput, stablecoin-native features, and full EVM compatibility. Both projects have provided their detailed token release schedules.

marsbitHá 2h