Forging Long-Term Holders

insights.glassnodePublicado em 2025-03-25Última atualização em 2025-04-02

Executive Summary

  • New demand inflows continue to wane, evidenced by a stark contraction in profit and loss volumes absorbed by the market.
  • The magnitude of profit and loss locked in by investors is now similar to the later stages of the 2024 accumulation range, with prices trading between $50k-$70k.
  • The number of Short-Term Holder coins in loss has recorded its largest value since 2018, suggesting the majority of new-investors are now underwater on their position. However, the dollar value of loss held across these coins remains in-line with previous bull market conditions.
  • Long-Term Holder supply is beginning to grow once more, highlighting an investor preference for HODLing and accumulating supply.
💡
View all charts in this edition in The Week On-chain Dashboard.

Demand Side Wanes

Demand-side pressure remain relatively light at the moment, with Bitcoin’s price continuing to oscillate back and forth within a newly established trading range centred around $85k. One way we can quantify demand is by assessing the volume of realized profit and loss locked in by investors, providing critical information on the sell-side forces occurring across spot markets.

We can explore this phenomenon through two key concepts:

  • Capital Inflows: Fresh capital entering the network as a new buyer purchases a coin at a premium to the sellers original cost basis (thus locking in a realized profit).
  • Capital Destruction: Holders who have sold at a loss (a realized loss), with a new investor picking up the coins at a discount from its original buy-price.

Ultimately, this metric describes the premium, or discount a seller was willing to transact at, and the market price at which a buyer on the other side of the trade was willing to accept.

Currently, combined realized profit and loss volumes have experienced a major contraction since the $109k ATH, collapsing from 3.4B$ to 508M$ (-85%). This metric is now recording a similar value to that seen during the 2024 accumulation zone between $50k and $70k, suggesting a similar demand profile.

Live Chart

We can also notice a dichotomy in the spending behavior occurring between the Long and Short-Term Holder cohorts.

Notably, the entirety of loss taking is originating from the Short-Term Holder cohort, who represent the most recent buyers, and thus the most likely to have bought in at higher prices. The unpredictable and volatile market conditions of late has clearly been a challenging landscape for new investors to navigate.

Conversely, the lions share of profit taking is being realized by the Long-Term Holder cohort, who through their extended time in the market, remain in an entirely profitable position.

Live Chart

Sustainable bull markets are typically characterized by consistent and growing inflows of fresh capital entering the network, with capital inflow events significantly outsizing those of capital destruction.

When assessing the difference between Long-Term Holder profit taking, and Short-Term Holder loss realization, we can see that this metric has returned to a neutral zone. Long-term Holder profits are now being offset by an equivalent volume of Short-Term Holder losses.

This suggests a relative stagnation in new capital inflows, weaker demand-side forces, and a slowing but still meaningful volume of profit taking acting as resistance.

Live Chart

A Top Heavy Market?

The Short-Term Holder cohort are responsible for the majority of loss taking events in a bull market. This is usually the case during both local market corrections, as well as last-gasp sell-off when the market transitions into a protracted bearish structure. Therefore, they become the primary cohort to analyze when gauging the severity and potential depth of a market drawdown.

Recent downside volatility has created strenuous conditions for new investors, with the volume of Short-Term Holder supply held in loss surging to a massive 3.4M BTC. This is the largest volume of STH supply in loss since July 2018.

Live Chart

From a relative perspective, the percent supply in loss metric has now broken above its +1SD band, with over 90% of the Short-Term Holder supply now residing in an underwater position.

This degree of Short-Term Holder loss has only occurred twice during our current bull market, namely during the Aug 2023 downturn, and the Aug 2024 Yen-Carry-Trade unwind.

This highlights the gravity of the pressure currently being experienced by new investors, and increases the probability of a market wide capitulation event.

Live Chart

Another way to evaluate the pressure on the Short-Term Holders is to assess the cost-basis of each individual age-band subset within the cohort. We can consider these as a sort of fast-to-slow ribbon of cost basis levels, providing a sort of momentum indicator:

  • < 24hr: $89.9k
  • < 1wk: $87.6k
  • < 1m: $87.4k
  • < 3m: $94.6k
  • < 6m: $93.0k

A key takeaway from this insight is that most of the STHs who have held for at least 1 month are underwater on their position. Unrealized losses are permeating throughout the Short-Term Holder cohort, creating significant financial pressure and stress for investors.

Live Chart

Unrealized Potential

In the previous section, we determined that a significant volume of Short-Term Holder coins are now held in loss. To complement this analysis, we can also evaluate the aggregate dollar value of unrealized losses (paper losses) held by these coins.

Using both of these metrics, we can better understand the magnitude of the financial damage held by recent buyers, and compare it across two related dimensions.

From the perspective of the unrealized loss metric (paper losses), Short-Term Holders are holding relatively elevated losses, being some of the largest of this cycle. However, the magnitude of paper losses remains near the upper-bound of values we have seen during most prior bull markets.

This suggests that whilst the financial stress investors are experiencing is meaningful, it is also not yet at levels which would be considered unexpected, or atypical for a bull market uptrend.

Live Chart

Bull markets have historically reached their zenith after the majority of the network wealth has been distributed from long-term tenured investors, to new and increasingly price sensitive speculators. These speculators eventually hold a majority of the supply at an elevated cost basis, making them highly sensitive to downside price action.

Presently, Short-Term Holders hold approximately 40% of the network wealth, after peaking at a value of 50% early in 2025. This peak remains notably lower than in previous cycles, where the wealth held by new investors peaked at around 70%-90% near the cycle peak.

There are a few potential explanations for this:

  • The 2023-25 cycle has thus far experienced more lengthy sideways periods of consolidation. This has allowed a progressive redistribution of supply, followed by investors becoming acclimated to new price altitudes.
  • Bitcoin in 2025 is better understood by both retail and institutional investors alike. As a result, Long-Term Holders may be more likely to hold onto more of their supply for a longer period of time, having developed a stronger conviction.
  • The presence of larger institutional investors, and the ETFs may have longer term time horizons and allocation preferences. As such, a larger proportion of the supply may be held for lengthy periods of time.

There are likely many factors influencing this dynamic, and it highlights and evolution in the Bitcoin investment thesis of both new and existing Bitcoin holders.

Live Chart

Forging Long-Term Holders

Periods when the Bitcoin price rises significantly are often accompanied by an uptick in the intensity of sell-side pressure as investors take profit. Historically, Long-Term Holders have been the primary cohort capitalising on higher prices during bull markets.

A unique market dynamic is developing within the prevailing cycle, with oscillating waves of LTH distribution followed by periods of accumulation, creating a more controlled and stable market environment. There have been two main waves of distribution and accumulation thus far:

  • Distribution Wave 1: LTHs distributed -929k BTC
  • Accumulation Wave 1: LTHs accumulated +817k BTC
  • Distribution Wave 2: LTHs distributed -1.11M BTC
  • Accumulation Wave 2: Currently +278k BTC

Across the two distribution waves, over 2M BTC in sell-side pressure has been absorbed. Generally speaking, this volume of sell-side has been enough to conclude previous bull markets, however, the periods of following re-accumulation have acted to offset a large portion of the distribution thus far.

This balance between periods of distribution and accumulation may be a key factor giving rise to the orderly price structure we are experiencing, where price surges create intense distribution and profit taking, but are followed by side-ways price action as investors re-accumulate supply.

Live Chart

Further evidence to support a second wave of accumulation being underway can be found within the wealth held by coins aged 3m-6m. This is a very specific cohort as it exists at the transition boundary between the Short-Term Holder and Long-Term Holder cohorts. It captures the pool of supply which is most likely to migrate into LTH status over the coming weeks and months.

Presently, the 3m-6m cohort is experiencing a large uptick in total wealth held, suggesting that coins which were acquired when the market first traded up to $100k are starting to age into this bracket.

This group represents the top buyers who have not yet capitulated under the market conditions, underscoring a degree of investor confidence and patience. This behavior can be viewed as a precursor to Long-Term Holder supply growth, provided the cohort continues to HODL on.

Live Chart

Additionally, when we normalize the volume which is spent by this cohort, we can see that their spending activity is the most subdued in has been since the May 2021 downturn.

This confirms a dominance of inactivity amongst these investors, suggesting that the incentive to HODL remains quite strong, and many are undeterred by their paper losses and the volatile market conditions.

Live Chart

The flip side of these observations is that the Long-Term Holder cohort still retains a substantial portion of the network wealth, holding almost 40% of invested value.

These periods of HODLing and accumulation can create a gradual constriction of the supply-side, which over time, can create the conditions for a new wave of demand to establish the next uptrend.

Live Chart

Summary and Conclusions

With the Bitcoin market trading within a new range between $78k and $88k. On-chain profit and loss taking events are declining in magnitude, highlighting a weaker demand profile, but also less sell-side pressure.

Short-Term Holders are currently experiencing a fairly significant degree of financial stress, with a large proportion of their holdings now underwater relative to the original cost basis. Whilst the STH cohort are dominating losses taken, the Long-Term Holder cohort are transitioning back into a period of accumulation, and we expect their aggregate supply to grow in the coming weeks and months as a result.


Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for information and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.

Exchange balances presented are derived from Glassnode’s comprehensive database of address labels, which are amassed through both officially published exchange information and proprietary clustering algorithms. While we strive to ensure the utmost accuracy in representing exchange balances, it is important to note that these figures might not always encapsulate the entirety of an exchange’s reserves, particularly when exchanges refrain from disclosing their official addresses. We urge users to exercise caution and discretion when utilizing these metrics. Glassnode shall not be held responsible for any discrepancies or potential inaccuracies. Please read our Transparency Notice when using exchange data.



Leituras Relacionadas

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手Há 21m

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手Há 21m

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbitHá 41m

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbitHá 41m

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

Ondo Finance founder and CEO Nathan Allman has passed away unexpectedly. Allman, a Brown University graduate with a background in private credit and Goldman Sachs' digital asset team, was a key architect of Ondo's pivot from DeFi structured yield products to becoming a leading Real-World Asset (RWA) protocol. He drove the strategy to tokenize traditional financial assets like US Treasuries (OUSG), yield-generating dollar assets (USDY), and US stocks/ETFs (Ondo Global Markets) for on-chain accessibility. The company announced that President Ian De Bode, a former McKinsey partner with a strong institutional strategy and operations background, will succeed Allman as CEO. While Allman's sudden departure presents a near-term challenge, testing market confidence and Ondo's continuity, the project is seen as more than a founder-driven narrative. It has an established product suite and a management team with deep traditional finance experience. The long-term impact hinges on the new leadership's ability to execute. De Bode's expertise in compliance, distribution, and institutional partnerships aligns with RWA's next phase of scaling infrastructure. The core question is whether Ondo can maintain its product momentum and institutional relationships. Ondo's native ONDO token represents governance and RWA narrative value, not direct revenue from the underlying assets. Its future as a "top tokenization play" will depend on the team's continued delivery of product growth, asset scale, and real-world demand, moving beyond the initial emotional shock.

marsbitHá 1h

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

marsbitHá 1h

Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Bankless co-founder David Hoffman recently sold his remaining ETH holdings, sparking debate within the Ethereum community. In a detailed explanation, Hoffman clarifies that his decision was not based on bearish sentiment towards Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about, but rather on the conclusion that the "ETH is Money" narrative has largely run its course. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve its envisioned status as global money, Ethereum needed to execute flawlessly across multiple layers—governance, technology, and market dominance—in a highly coordinated manner. He acknowledges Ethereum's significant successes and current justified valuation but suggests the window for a major revaluation based on this monetary narrative is closing. The post examines several challenges: the strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and native token value; the perceived failure of the "strong version" of crypto (user-owned, egalitarian systems) versus the rise of a "weak version" (efficient ledger technology for traditional finance); and the possibility that ETH's momentum as money was uniquely tied to the distorted conditions of the 2020-2021 period. Crucially, Hoffman highlights a structural tension: Ethereum is architected as a "giver, not a taker," providing critical infrastructure like secure block space and tokenization at cost. This ethos benefits the broader ecosystem (applications, L2s) but doesn't prioritize extracting maximum value for ETH itself. The "ETH is Money" thesis required Ethereum to win a war of overwhelming market dominance—a war its design philosophy refuses to explicitly fight. Therefore, while he sees continued immense success for the Ethereum network and its ecosystem (following a "fat application" theory where value accrues to apps and L2s), Hoffman finds it increasingly difficult to foresee a structural upward revaluation for the ETH asset based on the monetary narrative. His capital reallocation reflects a belief that this particular investment thesis has played out.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片