$36 Trillion Question: Can Bitcoin Really Save The US? Peter Schiff Thinks Not

bitcoinistPublicado em 2024-12-15Última atualização em 2024-12-16

Resumo

A renowned economist disagrees with Bitcoin supporters who claim that cryptocurrency could someday solve the national debt of the United...

A renowned economist disagrees with Bitcoin supporters who claim that cryptocurrency could someday solve the national debt of the United States.

Economist Peter Schiff expressed his skepticism on the bold declaration of what he called “Bitcoin pumpers” that 1 million BTC can settle the country’s national debt, saying that even with that number of cryptos, it will still be insufficient to address the country’s enormous government debt.

Not Enough To Pay US Debt

Schiff does not believe that 1 million Bitcoin is the answer to paying off the US national debt, arguing that to do that, the crypto needs to attain an unrealistic increase of over 20,000% in its market capitalization.

“#Bitcoin pumpers claim that if the U.S. buys 1 million Bitcoin, someday we will be able to use that Bitcoin to pay off the National Debt,” Schiff said in a post.

He explained that 1 million coins of the firstborn cryptocurrency would not be adequate to settle the country’s massive debt of around $36 trillion.

As of press time, Bitcoin is traded at $102,286 per coin. At the current price, one million Bitcoins would amount to over $102 billion, a huge amount but still meager compared to the enormous national debt of $36.25 trillion.

The economist said that Bitcoin could only make this happen if its market capitalization surged by over 20,000%, doubting if BTC could ever reach that exponential growth.

BTC is now trading at $102,519. Chart: TradingView

“For 1 million Bitcoin to equal today’s $36.25 trillion National Debt, Bitcoin’s market cap would be $761 trillion, 6x larger than world GDP,” he said.

Government Debt Keeps On Growing

Schiff sees Bitcoin’s total value increasing by more than 200,000% as improbable, so BTC paying the US debt is not possible.

The economist explained that by the time, if ever, Bitcoin reached $761 trillion in market capitalization the state debt would also grow at that time, adding, “By then the national debt will be much more than $36.25 trillion, requiring a much higher Bitcoin price to pay it off.”

He added that if the crypto’s market capitalization becomes too high, it is highly likely that its price will fall, which would not be a good cue for traders.

He argued that the US debt is not fixed but rather increases over time, saying that the American government borrows money annually, so consequently, state debt will continue to grow every year, which makes it even harder for Bitcoin to pay off the national debt.

Not Yet A Global Currency

Schiff questioned if Bitcoin would be adopted at a global scale like fiat currencies, noting that even though BTC’s prices have soared, the crypto has not yet been used as a global currency.

“There will not be global adoption. So far very few people have adopted it at all,” Schiff remarked.

He said that few countries have accepted Bitcoin as their official currency while many governments still oppose the idea of crypto replacing their currencies.

“Bitcoin is a speculative asset, and its value is driven by hope, not real demand,” he said.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Leituras Relacionadas

Zuckerberg Gave the AI Bull Market a Fright

Mark Zuckerberg and Meta inadvertently sent shockwaves through the AI stock market. News that Meta plans to sell its "excess" AI computing power to external clients triggered a trillion-dollar sell-off in AI infrastructure stocks like Nvidia and AMD, while Meta's stock rose. This seemingly simple business move—renting out idle resources—shook a core assumption underpinning the two-year AI bull market: the belief that computing power ("compute") would be perpetually scarce. This scarcity narrative had fueled valuations across the entire supply chain, from GPUs to power suppliers. Meta's motivations are layered: improving hardware utilization during non-peak R&D periods, executing a strategic pivot, and redefining AI infrastructure. Unlike rivals selling APIs, Meta's open-source approach with Llama appears aimed at building an ecosystem where it ultimately profits from the underlying compute, similar to how AWS transformed from Amazon's internal capacity. Meta is essentially offering an integrated "AI factory" service, not just raw GPU rental. The market's fear wasn't Meta selling a few chips, but the signal that GPU supply might become more shareable and efficient, transitioning the industry from a Capex-driven "hoarding" model to an Opex-driven "utilization" model. This could fundamentally reset valuation logic from scarcity to efficiency. While the sell-off reversed somewhat as investors realized this shift is long-term, the direction is set. The move marks a potential inflection point: the era of easy valuation gains from simply buying GPUs may be ending, giving way to an era where operational efficiency and return on AI assets take center stage.

marsbitHá 6m

Zuckerberg Gave the AI Bull Market a Fright

marsbitHá 6m

Arcus Chooses "Stepfather" Robinhood Chain, "Biological Father" dYdX Awkwardly Attempts to Salvage the Situation

Robinhood officially launched its own Layer 2 network, Robinhood Chain. In response, many major DeFi protocols like Uniswap and Chainlink announced integration. A key point of discussion was Arcus, a new decentralized exchange (DEX) developed by the dYdX team, which chose to launch on Robinhood Chain instead of the native dYdX Chain. Arcus offers 24/7, zero-fee trading of 95 tokenized stocks and perpetual contracts. This move sparked community concerns about dYdX Chain potentially being sidelined, causing DYDX token's price to drop over 12%. Critics questioned if dYdX Labs' focus is shifting to Arcus and how DYDX token holders would benefit from Arcus's future growth, especially as its founder mentioned a future Arcus token would allocate a portion to the dYdX community. dYdX founder Antonio Juliano clarified that dYdX Chain will continue operating, but acknowledged its deep decentralization involved trade-offs in performance and user experience. He stated Arcus is a separate product led by a new CEO, responding to market demands for faster, simpler platforms. The dYdX Foundation also confirmed DYDX's role remains unchanged for dYdX Chain governance and staking, with no plans for token migration. However, the core uncertainty remains: if Arcus succeeds, how will that value flow back to dYdX Chain and its DYDX token holders?

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Arcus Chooses "Stepfather" Robinhood Chain, "Biological Father" dYdX Awkwardly Attempts to Salvage the Situation

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片