Эксперт: Сатоши Накамото провел атаку 51% на сеть биткоина в 2009 году

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2024-05-04Última atualização em 2024-10-04

  • Аналитик под псевдонимом Wicked пришел к выводу, что Сатоши Накамото реализовал в 2009 году атаку 51% на сеть первой криптовалюты.
  • Речь идет о действиях майнера Patoshi, за личностью которого, по мнению ряда экспертов, скрывался создатель биткоина.
  • Wicked отметил, что в то время актив не имел практически никакой ценности, а сам процесс использовался для исследовательских целей.

Сатоши Накамото, по всей вероятности, провел так называемую атаку 51% на сеть биткоина в 2009 году, считает аналитик под псевдонимом Wicked. По его словам, создатель первой криптовалюты таким образом провел стресс-тест блокчейна и корректировал сложность сети.

The Patoshi Pattern was first discovered by @SDLerner and has since been revisited and analyzed by @lopp and others. It’s one of the most interesting datasets in all of #Bitcoin’s history and one of the few instances where Satoshi left some breadcrumbs behind for us to follow. pic.twitter.com/6RGMNdhDkY

— Wicked (@w_s_bitcoin) October 1, 2024

Эксперт проанализировал явление, известное как «Patoshi pattern». Его открыл в 2020 году исследователь и криптограф Серхио Демиан Лернер. Тогда ученый пришел к выводу, что на ранней стадии существования биткоина один майнер сумел обработать 22 000 блоков и добыть 1,1 млн BTC.

Лернер назвал этого человека Патоши, скрестив слова «паттерн» и «Сатоши». Он заявил, что за личностью упомянутого майнера, вероятно, скрывался создатель первой криптовалюты. Главной особенностью Патоши был метод майнинга, который внедрил нестандартное использование формы метаданных ExtraNonce в сoinbase-транзакции.

Ряд экспертов считает, что единственной достаточно мощной системой, подключенной к сети биткоина в 2009 году, был принадлежащий Сатоши Накамото компьютер. Wicked изучил данные Лернера и предположил, что Патоши в тот период времени провел атаку 51% на блокчейн.

По мнению аналитика, речь идет не о злонамеренном сетевом рейде, а про стресс-тест и специальную корректировку сложности майнинга. Все это дало возможность проверить надежность системы и повысить стабильность ее работы, считает эксперт.

На ранних этапах своего существования биткоин не имел практически никакой ценности, поэтому финансовой выгоды Патоши не получал, подчеркнул Wicked.

Отметим, что в наши дни атака 51% характеризуется как преступная операция в отношении блокчейна или проекта, когда злоумышленники получают контроль над более чем половиной (51%) стейков или вычислительной мощности сети.

Такие действия дают возможность переписать историю транзакций или предотвратить их завершение. С ее помощью хакеры могут также заблокировать вознаграждение валидаторов и получить двойную оплату за токены.

Напомним, ранее мы писали, что сооснователь проекта Ethereum Виталик Бутерин призвал сообщество экосистемы лучше подготовиться к гипотетической атаке 51%.

Leituras Relacionadas

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

"World Model" has become a widely used yet ambiguous term in AI. Drawing from the classic POMDP framework (agent → action → state → observation), this article proposes a functional taxonomy to clarify the concept. It identifies three distinct types, categorized by their output in the perception-action loop: 1. **Renderers**: Output visual observations (pixels). These models, like advanced video generators, prioritize visual fidelity but often lack underlying physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output the state of the world (geometry, physics, dynamics). They provide a structurally accurate representation for professionals (e.g., architects) and serve as training environments for robots and AI agents. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they determine what an agent should do next, closing the perception-action loop (e.g., vision-language-action models). While renderers are currently the most commercially mature and planners are the most aspirational, the article argues that **simulators are the crucial, underappreciated hub**. By working at the level of geometry and physics, a simulator can project upwards to create visuals for humans and downwards to predict action consequences for agents. The future lies in the convergence of these three functions. Emerging research and products, like World Labs' Marble model which outputs both visual splats and physical collision meshes, are beginning to blur these boundaries. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of rendering, simulating, and planning based on a shared understanding of spatial and temporal structures—ultimately enabling machines to understand, imagine, and interact with the physical world.

链捕手Há 5m

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

链捕手Há 5m

Doubao and Qwen Will Discontinue Agent Functionality on July 15

On July 4th, Doubao and Tongyi Qianwen announced the impending shutdown of their user-created "AI Agent" features. Doubao confirmed its agent feature will be taken offline on July 15, directing users to ByteDance's CatBox app for similar needs. On the same day, Tongyi Qianwen notified users, specifying that personalized interactive agents and user-built agent functions will cease on July 10, with all agent features and services completely deactivated by July 15. After this date, access to agent configurations and historical chat records will be lost. This adjustment impacts core user scenarios like role-playing, personal assistants, and vertical tool agents. The shutdown date coincides with the official implementation of China's "Interim Measures for the Administration of Artificial Intelligence Human-like Interactive Services" on July 15. The new regulations impose strict rules on "human-like emotional interaction services," requiring platforms to implement measures like anti-addiction systems, minor verification, and content moderation. This move is widely seen as a proactive step by the platforms to align with regulatory timelines and mitigate compliance risks. Additionally, commercial challenges are a key driver. Analysis suggests that casual, human-like chat agents generate high-frequency, low-value interactions, leading to high computational costs with poor monetization. As the AI application market shifts from user growth to proving value, sustaining such "high-cost, low-efficiency" user-generated content becomes difficult. Both platforms have outlined transition plans. Doubao will allow data viewing and self-backup for a period after shutdown, with data scheduled for permanent deletion by October 15. Tongyi Qianwen similarly advised users to save important content via copying or screenshots before the deadline. This strategic retreat from C-end agent features signals a broader market shift. Compliance capability and sustainable business models are replacing user scale and feature richness as the new core competitive dimensions. Tongyi Qianwen's recent move to fully open its Agent and Skill platforms to third-party enterprises and developers further underscores a strategic pivot from low-value C-end services to high-value B-end enterprise scenarios.

marsbitHá 3h

Doubao and Qwen Will Discontinue Agent Functionality on July 15

marsbitHá 3h

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

In 2026, OpenAI's Codex saw explosive growth, with weekly active users surging over 5x to 5 million since January, driven largely by the February launch of its desktop app. Codex desktop lead Andrew Ambrosino explains key shifts behind its evolution. A core change is the inversion of development costs: implementation is now cheap, while curation and taste—judging which of many AI-generated prototypes is valuable—have become the new scarcities. Ambrosino defines taste as a blend of aesthetics, systems thinking, direction, and semantic coherence in interaction. He notes AI still struggles with design because evaluating it requires human cultural context and abstract reasoning about how components relate—capabilities beyond current models. Timing is critical: the same Codex app would have failed months earlier; success hinges on the model's capabilities at launch. Roles are blurring within his team, with engineers, designers, and PMs overlapping significantly. However, Ambrosino cautions against eliminating specialized roles entirely, as each field retains deep expertise. On AI-assisted development, the focus has shifted from measuring code written by AI to distinguishing between supervised and unsupervised generation. A current challenge is teaching models to simplify code, not just add complexity. The merger of Codex and ChatGPT stems from observed user behavior: non-developers adopted Codex for general knowledge work despite its developer-centric interface. This revealed a collapsing boundary between specialized tools and universal assistants. The vision is a "home base" that orchestrates tasks across external professional tools (like Excel or Premiere Pro) via connectors, rather than rebuilding everything internally. An internal example showed Codex helping edit video by interacting with Premiere Pro's files and even writing a plugin for it. The future direction is a unified, extensible platform that serves as a central hub for automating and managing work across any specialized tool the user employs.

marsbitHá 3h

Why Did Codex and ChatGPT Merge? What's Next for Codex? OpenAI Core Leader Answers Everything

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
活动图片