Mysten Labs анонсировала предзаказ Web3-консоли SuiPlay0X1

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2023-12-02Última atualização em 2024-09-02

3 сентября стоящая за L1-блокчейном Sui компания Mysten Labs откроет предзаказ консоли SuiPlay0X1, разработанной в партнерстве с Playtron для Web3-игр.

Ready / Sui // Play ➡️

😎"A gaming revolution"

Pre-orders for the #SuiPlay0X1 coming 👀very 👀 soon.👀 pic.twitter.com/LLIhTumWa6
— SuiPlay (@SuiPlayOfficial) August 29, 2024

Издание VentureBeat со ссылкой на заявление разработчиков сообщило, что цена за устройство составит $600 (без учета налога и доставки). Покупку можно будет совершить за SUI, ETH или SOL.

Первые 1000 клиентов, оформившие предзаказ SuiPlay0X1, получат NFT, который откроет «особый доступ» к наградам и скидкам в будущем. Доставка консолей начнется в 2025 году.

«SuiPlay0X1 продемонстрирует, что игры, органично включающие технологию блокчейна, выглядят и ощущаются не иначе, чем традиционные Web2-игры — она покажет геймерам по всему миру: владение игроком благодаря технологии блокчейна обеспечивает более глубокий и увлекательный игровой опыт, не нарушая веселья», — заявил главный менеджер по продукту Mysten Labs Аденийи Абиодун.

Устройство представляет портативную консоль со следующими характеристиками:

процессор — AMD Ryzen 7 7840U;
графический процессор — AMD Ryzen 780M GPU;
память — 16 ГБ оперативной памяти, SSD на 512 ГБ и слот для карты памяти;
экран — 7-дюймовый дисплей IPS No-Bezel с разрешением 1920×1200;
операционная система — Playtron
размеры: 264,5 мм x 105,5 мм x 21,5 мм;
вес — 677 г.

SuiPlay0X1 сможет запускать игры для ПК на нескольких платформах, включая Epic Games и Steam. На консоль также перенесут блокчейн-игры с Sui вроде Xociety, Pop Shooter и Dark Times.

«В конце концов, геймерам все равно, какие технологии лежат в основе игры. Игры просто должны быть интересными и работать безупречно», — добавил Абиодун.

Напомним, в мае 2023 года Mysten Labs объявила о многочисленных партнерствах с компаниями-разработчиками для запуска игр на блокчейне Sui Network.

Leituras Relacionadas

Dogecoin Open Interest Hovers Around $959 Million As Traders Wait For Recovery Signal

Dogecoin open interest remains around $959 million, indicating significant activity in derivatives despite slower weekend trading. This high level of exposure makes the market sensitive to sharp price moves, as leveraged positions can amplify volatility. However, open interest alone does not predict direction; traders must also watch price action, funding rates, and liquidation levels. As a sentiment-driven asset, Dogecoin's future depends on whether it can attract genuine spot buying to support high leverage. Currently, no clear recovery signal is present, but the engaged derivatives market means the next confirmed price move could be significant.

bitcoinistHá 37m

Dogecoin Open Interest Hovers Around $959 Million As Traders Wait For Recovery Signal

bitcoinistHá 37m

Grant Cardone raises Bitcoin holdings to 2,700 BTC – Why now?

Grant Cardone's firm Cardone Capital increased its Bitcoin holdings to approximately 2,700 BTC, purchased at an average of $59,000, amid a market downturn. This accumulation contrasts with actions from MicroStrategy, the largest corporate holder, which recently authorized selling up to $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin after its first-ever sale in June. The broader market also saw significant selling pressure, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experiencing a record net outflow of roughly $4.06 billion in June. However, technical analysis using Bollinger Bands on the weekly chart suggests Bitcoin may have reached a potential bottom, as the price touched the lower band—a historical support level.

ambcryptoHá 1h

Grant Cardone raises Bitcoin holdings to 2,700 BTC – Why now?

ambcryptoHá 1h

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbitHá 1h

marsbitHá 1h

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手Há 1h

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手Há 1h

Cardano’s ‘ghost chain’ label debunked? Why ADA’s 34 dApps don’t tell the full story

The article examines and refutes the "ghost chain" label sometimes applied to Cardano (ADA). While Cardano has significantly fewer dApps and lower transaction/user counts compared to leading Layer 1 chains like Ethereum and Solana, this is partly due to its unique Extended Unspent Transaction Output (EUTXO) model. This model batches transactions, improving security and determinism but potentially underrepresenting true on-chain activity. The piece acknowledges recent ecosystem challenges but highlights Cardano's strong development activity and its distinct focus on peer-reviewed research, security, and sustainability for institutional use. It concludes that while various chains occupy different niches, low activity metrics alone are insufficient to deem Cardano a "ghost chain."

ambcryptoHá 2h

Cardano’s ‘ghost chain’ label debunked? Why ADA’s 34 dApps don’t tell the full story

ambcryptoHá 2h

Trading

Spot