盘点近期有催化剂驱动的 15 个加密项目

深潮Publicado em 2024-08-26Última atualização em 2024-08-26

Symbiotic 会在代币生成事件(TGE)中抢先于 Eigenlayer,并从 Eigenlayer 手中夺走“再质押”的热度之冠吗?

作者:Ignas | DeFi

编译:深潮TechFlow

目前的加密牛市主要受外部宏观因素的影响,但令人兴奋的新产品发布和催化剂即将到来,将推动内部加密生态的发展。

以下是我关注的前15个项目:

Monad(预计在2024年底上线主网)

我们真的需要另一个 alit-L1吗?

它会成为另一个流通量低、市场估值高的抛售盛宴吗?

Monad 能否吸引独特的、非分叉的去中心化应用(dApps)?

MegaETH(预计在2024年底上线主网)

它是一个普通的二层解决方案,还是一个真正的游戏改变者,为 ETH+L2 模块化扩展路线图带来热度?

它能否真正实现每秒10万笔交易(TPS)和1毫秒的区块时间,还是仅仅是之前牛市的老套路?

Berachain

这是一个让投机者和内部人士获得收益和抛售的地方,还是一个为早期用户提供独特非分叉 dApps 的财富创造平台?

我对此持怀疑态度,但愿意被积极的结果所惊喜。

Eigenlayer 第二次质押活动

预计在第三季度/第四季度进行 EIGEN 交易,以及多个 AVS 在主网上线:

是时候为加密社区澄清再质押的真正价值了,目前还没有很多人理解。

代币发布将揭示再质押是否仍然受到热捧。

Eigenlayer(即将推出的无许可代币支持)

由于风险投资公司和团队对旧的、经过验证的模型采取保守态度,代币经济学的创新停滞不前。

再质押能否为代币经济学带来新的实用性和兴奋,惠及其社区?

Symbiotic(预计在第三季度上线主网)

Symbiotic 会在代币生成事件(TGE)中抢先于 Eigenlayer,并从 Eigenlayer 手中夺走“再质押”的热度之冠吗?

考虑到最近 Paradigm 支持的项目如 Friend Tech 和 Blast,它可能会在初期表现良好,但具体情况还有待观察。

Ethereum Pectra 升级(预计在2025年第一季度)

EIP-7702 的账户抽象能否结束那些令人厌烦的代币批准?

Pectra 会对 ETH 的滞后价格产生任何积极影响吗?

Fantom 正在进行品牌重塑为 Sonic:

一只从灰烬中崛起的凤凰,带着新名称、新代币 $S 和新图表,还是其他的?

成功的品牌重塑可以激励其他项目,带来新的叙事,并为短期交易提供借鉴。

Maker 的品牌重塑:过渡到 NewGovToken 和 NewStableToken

Maker 已经发展成为一个非常复杂的系统,甚至连加密领域的老手都难以跟上。

这次品牌重塑能否简化操作,使其更易于理解,从而推动 $DAI 的供应增长?

Pudgy Penguin 的 L2 解决方案(Abstract)、Story(IP 链)和索尼的 Soneium:这是新的加密叙事的开始吗?

他们能否在 AI 时代实际构建新的创作者与消费者的货币化模型?

如果成功,可能会吸引超越投机者群体的新加密用户。

Fractal Bitcoin(主网即将上线)以及 OP_CAT:

尽管 BRC20s、Ordinals 和 Runes 的 FOMO 和价格下跌,但这两个发展正在为本土比特币带回热度。它们的热度会持续吗?

此外,Babylon 主网的成功上线显示出对 BTC 上 DeFi 的需求。

Stacks Nakamoto 升级(即将到来):

这次升级是否会吸引更多用户和生态系统的总锁仓价值(TVL)?Stacks 生态的空投会产生财富效应吗?

目前,Stacks 在 BTC 二层的市场份额占据主导地位,但竞争对手正在迅速追赶。

Coinbase cbBTC 上线:

在 wBTC 管理结构发生变化后,另一个 ERC20 BTC 的机会已经出现。

cbBTC 将捕获大部分 wBTC 的总锁仓价值。接下来哪个 DeFi BTC 包装会出现?这可能是一个有前景的交易机会。

Uniswap(潜在的 $UNI 费用分享,日期待定):这会引发 #realyield 的复兴吗?

其他 DeFi 协议会跟进吗?Frax 已经启用了费用切换,AAVE 在费用切换提案后上涨。

UNI 的费用切换将对 DeFi 发展产生积极影响。

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitwise CIO: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Begin in Autumn

Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, explains the recent Bitcoin price drop below $60,000 and its connection to the steep decline in MicroStrategy's STRC (Strategy's Perpetual Preferred Stock). STRC, designed as a high-yield, stable-price instrument, fell from its $100 target to $75 due to market fears over MicroStrategy's ability to sustain its dividend amid Bitcoin's price weakness. Hougan clarifies that while MicroStrategy's overall financial position remains strong, with significant Bitcoin holdings and cash, the core market anxiety centered on the optional nature of the dividend payments. In response, MicroStrategy announced a new operational framework: it will sell some Bitcoin as needed to fund dividends, will no longer actively defend the $100 share price through dividend hikes, and may repurchase STRC on the open market. This shift marks a change in MicroStrategy's role from a consistent, one-way buyer of Bitcoin to a more dynamic participant that may both buy and sell. According to Hougan, the STRC volatility is a classic late-cycle event, signaling the painful but necessary process of flushing out excessive leverage from the market. He draws parallels to the unwinding of the GBTC premium in the previous cycle. He identifies key potential bottoming signals: MSTR trading at a discount to its net asset value (NAV), extreme readings on the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, and persistently negative Bitcoin funding rates. Hougan concludes that while the exact timing of the market bottom is unpredictable, the current deleveraging phase suggests it is near. He expresses confidence that a new bull market will begin in the fall of this year, with the next major wave of buying expected to come from institutional investors like banks, asset managers, and pension funds.

Foresight NewsHá 11m

Bitwise CIO: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Begin in Autumn

Foresight NewsHá 11m

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

On June 29th, the ENS community entered the on-chain voting phase for a proposal to renew the ENS DAO Security Council's veto power for two more years. Shortly after voting began, ENS founder Nick Johnson used his substantial ENS holdings to cast over 3.55 million votes against the proposal, swinging the outcome despite initial strong support. The Security Council was established in July 2024 with a 4/8 multisig veto power to protect the DAO's treasury (valued over $350 million) from malicious proposals during a period of low voter participation. Its powers were limited to vetoing only harmful proposals, not normal ones. Nick Johnson's opposition stems from broader concerns about ENS DAO's governance. In late 2025, he and others expressed frustration that the DAO had become mired in political gamesmanship, with capable contributors leaving and leadership falling to less experienced or misaligned parties. This context set the stage for a major restructuring proposal by ENS COO Katherine Wu on June 19th, titled "Next Era of ENS DAO: Empowering the ENS Foundation." The controversial proposal aims to transfer daily operations, treasury management, and long-term strategy to a restructured ENS Foundation with a professional board, while the DAO would retain core protocol governance powers. Critics, including original ENS constitution author Brantly Millegan, argue this effectively transfers treasury control from token holders to ENS Labs (the core development team), undermining the DAO's original decentralized design. Nick's massive "no" vote on the Security Council renewal is seen as the first move in this power struggle. He explained his vote was due to concerns about insufficient checks on the Council's power and the potential for its veto to be used politically. In response, Katherine Wu submitted a revised proposal with higher execution thresholds (5/8 instead of 4/8) and stricter limits. The push for change comes as ENS's annual revenue has declined significantly, from over $10 million in 2023 to under $2 million in 2025, increasing pressure to manage the treasury more effectively. Nick Johnson now faces the challenge of proving that a more structured foundation can steer ENS better than the current DAO model.

Foresight NewsHá 41m

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

Foresight NewsHá 41m

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

AI performance in predicting the 2026 FIFA World Cup knockout matches varied significantly, according to an analysis of models including ChatGPT, Grok, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude. The standout predictions came from DeepSeek and Gemini for the Netherlands vs. Morocco match. Gemini precisely forecasted a 1-1 draw and a penalty shootout win for Morocco, while DeepSeek correctly identified the high probability of a draw and Morocco's potential to advance via a defensive and counter-attacking strategy. Grok and Tongyi Qianwen (千问) demonstrated strength in predicting accurate scores for matches with clearer favorites. They correctly called the narrow 1-0 win for Canada over South Africa and Brazil's 2-1 victory over Japan, as well as Norway's 2-1 win over Ivory Coast. ChatGPT and Claude excelled more in match process analysis than in predicting exact scores or upsets. They frequently identified potential challenges for favorites, such as Japan's pressing against Brazil or DR Congo's defensive tactics against England, even when predicting the favorite's ultimate victory. A notable failure was the unanimous misjudgment of Germany vs. Paraguay. All models incorrectly favored Germany, underestimating Paraguay's ability to force a penalty shootout and cause an upset. In summary, Gemini and DeepSeek showed the most insight for high-stakes, unpredictable matches. Grok and Qianwen were reliable "score predictors" for less volatile games. ChatGPT and Claude were strong "analytical models," adept at outlining match dynamics but often hesitant to predict upsets.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片