MATIC会飙升450%吗?是的,分析师说,但不是在…

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-22Última atualização em 2024-08-23

币界网报道:
    截至发稿时,MATIC已飙升12.5%,分析师预测可能上涨450%。尽管投资者兴趣日益浓厚,但MATIC的超买RSI表明可能存在短期风险。

Polygon[MATIC]经历了充满挑战的一年,与市值最高的加密货币同行相比表现不佳。

尽管许多主要资产出现了令人印象深刻的增长,其中一些资产年初至今飙升超过100%,但同期MATIC下降了3.5%。

然而,最近的事态发展表明,势头可能发生转变。在过去的一天里,MATIC的价格大幅上涨了12.5%,使其新闻发布时的交易价格达到0.5303美元。

考虑到该代币最近的低点,这一飙升尤其引人注目,本月早些时候该代币的交易价格低于0.400美元。

MATIC:450%的涨幅即将到来?

最近的价格变动引起了分析师的注意。一位著名的加密货币分析师Javon Marks最近在X(前身为推特)上分享了他对MATIC的乐观展望。

Marks指出,MATIC开始显示出“强大的实力”,并暗示该代币可能即将大幅上涨。

山寨币有可能攀升至历史新高,可能比发行时的水平上涨450%以上。

Marks分享的图表进一步支持了这种看涨情绪,该图表显示MATIC形成了一个不断扩大的楔形模式。

这种技术形态通常被认为是一种看涨的延续模式,表明MATIC可能会出现大幅上涨。

基本面分析

为了了解MATIC是否真的为大幅上涨做好了准备,AMBCrypto评估了其基本面。

其中一个水平是未平仓合约的激增,未平仓合约是指资产的未偿衍生品合约总数。

根据Coinglass的数据,MATIC的未平仓合约在过去一天中增长了近40%,达到2.0939亿美元的新闻发布时估值。

除此之外,未平仓合约量也大幅增长了216%,目前价值13亿美元。

未平仓合约和交易量的增加表明投资者对MATIC市场的兴趣和参与度越来越高。

当未平仓合约随价格上涨时,这通常表明新的资本正在流入市场,这可能会导致价格进一步上涨。

然而,值得注意的是,虽然增加未平仓合约可能是一个看涨信号,但它也可能导致波动性加剧,特别是在交易者杠杆率很高的情况下。

这意味着,虽然存在进一步上涨的潜力,但价格向任何一个方向大幅波动的风险也在增加。

另一个需要考虑的关键指标是相对强弱指数(RSI),它衡量价格变动的速度和变化。

RSI值高于70通常表示资产超买,而低于30则表示超卖。

根据CryptoQuant的数据,截至发稿时,MATIC的RSI为72,表明该代币处于超买区域。


你的投资组合是绿色的吗?查看MATIC利润计算器


交易员经常使用RSI作为信号来评估资产是否过度扩张,是否需要调整。

就MATIC而言,超买RSI表明,虽然该代币已经强劲上涨,但如果交易者开始获利,价格可能会面临短期压力。

Leituras Relacionadas

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbitHá 40m

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbitHá 40m

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手Há 49m

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手Há 49m

Trading

Spot
活动图片