微软为行动不便的游戏玩家推出Xbox自适应游戏杆

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-22Última atualização em 2024-08-22

币界网报道:

在Gamescom 2024期间,微软宣布推出其新的Xbox自适应操纵杆,该操纵杆旨在使行动不便的人能够更充分地参与视频游戏。在宣布这一消息时,该游戏杆在Gamescom 2024上展出,被认为是无障碍游戏技术的里程碑。

Xbox自适应操纵杆将于明年初推出,是Xbox控制器的简化标准版本。它包括四个常规按钮以及两个用于缓冲和触发命令的额外按钮。然而,最引人注目的功能可能是其可定制的拇指杆,可以根据任何玩家的特定需求进行定制。

微软提供了几种类型的拇指杆,包括可以通过3D打印过程轻松放入操纵杆的拇指杆。一个这样的例子是,当他们不能完全用手时,使用下巴操作的拇指杆来控制运动

残疾玩家推动新Xbox游戏杆的设计

Xbox自适应操纵杆的制造是一家合资企业,残疾游戏玩家直接参与了之前版本的测试。他们的回应对其最终设计做出了巨大贡献,因此它满足了游戏社区的各种需求。Kaitlyn Jones在Gamescom直播中强调了这一合作,并提到这些信息在决定这款游戏杆的价格方面发挥了至关重要的作用。它将以30美元的标价发布;因此,对于行动不便的玩家来说,这是负担得起的。

除了Xbox自适应操纵杆,微软还推出了8BitDo的Lite SE控制器,扩大了可访问游戏工具的范围。因此,玩家已经可以在亚马逊上以60美元的价格购买Lite SE控制器,从而为希望玩自己喜欢的游戏的残疾玩家提供了另一种选择。适合那些渴望根据个人喜好选择另一种形式或更多可定制功能的人。

通过这些创新,微软在游戏可访问性方面处于领先地位,并允许许多人参与和享受视频游戏,尽管存在物理限制。明年初发布的Xbox自适应操纵杆肯定会彻底改变许多人的生活,因为它将是一个面向所有玩家的全方位平台。

Leituras Relacionadas

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbitHá 39m

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbitHá 39m

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手Há 48m

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手Há 48m

Trading

Spot
活动图片