诚邀 | CertiK韩国区块链周活动速览 现已开启报名

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-22Última atualização em 2024-08-22

币界网报道：

13727-1724241271855.png

8月20日，头部Web3.0安全机构CertiK宣布将在韩国区块链周（KBW）期间，联合CertiK Ventures共同举办两场特别的活动。同时还将作为合作伙伴参加活动，CertiK的CSO将出席并参与讨论。

在本次CertiK活动中，CertiK Ventures、SNZ Capital、Somnia、Four Pillars、Mantle Network和Vertex将作为联合主办方参与，BlockBeats、Odaily、PANews、Foresight News、Techub News、Coinness、BLOCKMEDIA和etoday将作为网络和社区媒体合作伙伴参与。

KBW Brunch with CertiK Ventures

13727-1724241176746.png

在KBW 2024期间，CertiK将于9月4日在首尔Dewblock联合CertiK Ventures、SNZ Capital和Somnia共同举办Brunch活动，现已开启报名。届时，参与者将有机会与区块链行业的专家们进行深入交流。CertiK Ventures旨在培养并参与以安全为先的项目、赋能开创型技术、开拓关键生态系统合作伙伴关系以及参与前瞻性风险投资轮次。目前，CertiK Ventures已在全球范围内构建了多样化的投资组合，包括韩国的WEMIX和LINE。

时间：2024年9月4日 10:00 - 14:00（GMT+9）

地点：Dewblock（首尔市广津区峨嵯山路78街157号）

UP ONLY：攀岩活动

13727-1724241207592.png

9月5日，CertiK携手FourPillars、MantleNetwork和Vertex共同主办的UP ONLY攀岩活动将在首尔江南区的TheClimb举行。作为KBW期间举办的300多场Side Event中唯一的攀岩赛事，该活动不仅为参与者提供了一次独特的体验，更是一个分享和交流的平台。在这里，参与者可以深入探讨区块链安全的重要性，为开发创新的想法和解决方案提供更广阔的机会。

时间：2024年9月5日 13:00 - 17:00（GMT+9）

地点：Theclimb（首尔市，江南区）

MKGA峰会

此外，CertiK还将作为合作伙伴参加9月5日在GSTOWER由KnightFuryAlliance(KFA)、Kaia和LineNext主办的MKGA峰会，CertiK的首席安全官李康教授将受邀参与“基础设施与安全”圆桌会议的讨论。

会议时间：2024年9月5日 13:45 - 14:15

地点：GS大厦（首尔市，江南区）

报名从速，活动现场见！

Leituras Relacionadas

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHá 28m

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHá 28m

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Há 31m

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Há 31m

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHá 1h

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHá 1h

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

Strategy CEO Phong Le emphasizes that the company's legacy software business is integral to its Bitcoin Treasury Company model, creating unique operational, financial, and cultural synergies. He argues that the software division, which recently reported its strongest quarter in a decade with 12% revenue growth and 27% margin expansion, funds Bitcoin-related expenses and provides a critical institutional foundation. This includes a 35-year operating history, public company infrastructure, and extensive compliance standards that most digital asset firms lack. Conversely, Le states the Bitcoin strategy has energized employees and engaged customers. Looking ahead, Strategy is leveraging its "Mosaic" AI data platform to automate internal systems and drive its software evolution, aiming for more autonomous and adaptive operations.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

bitcoinistHá 1h

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbitHá 1h

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow