埃隆·马斯克揭示了通货膨胀的根本原因,表示他愿意成为政府效率委员会的一员

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-18Última atualização em 2024-08-18

币界网报道:

亿万富翁埃隆·马斯克认为,一个实体是美国商品和服务价格上涨的罪魁祸首。

特斯拉首席执行官在社交媒体平台X上表示,美国通货膨胀的根本原因是联邦政府的巨额预算赤字。

“通货膨胀是由联邦政府支出超过收入造成的,因为他们只是印更多的钱来弥补差额。为了解决通货膨胀,减少浪费的政府支出。你的税款应该花得好,而不是花得差。”

美国财政部的数据显示,仅在2024财年的前10个月,国家赤字就激增至1.516万亿美元。国会预算办公室(CBO)预计,到2024年9月30日,即本财政年度结束时,国家赤字将飙升至2万亿美元。

在接受播客Lex Fridman采访时,PayPal联合创始人、全球首富马斯克表示,他愿意与政府分享自己的专业知识,以改善国家的财政状况。

“我已经与特朗普讨论了政府效率委员会的想法,我愿意成为该委员会的一员…

抗体反应将非常强烈。此时,你正在攻击矩阵。[该]矩阵将进行反击。”

Coinbase首席执行官布莱恩·阿姆斯特朗(Brian Armstrong)同意马斯克的观点,他表示,如果美国政府停止印制更多美元,通货膨胀将几乎消失。

“人们试图解释通货膨胀的原因,但主要原因是政府支出比实际更多,需要印刷更多。

抵消这一点,大多数通货膨胀问题就会消失。

比特币是对过度通货膨胀的制衡。购买它是对通货膨胀的投票。”

不要错过任何一个节拍-订阅以直接将电子邮件提醒发送到您的收件箱查看价格行动在X、Facebook和Telegram上关注我们冲浪每日Hodl Mix

生成图像:DALLE3

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbitHá 1h

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片