CPI数据利好不涨原因的竟然是这样当前最值得关注的事是哪些

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-15Última atualização em 2024-08-15

币界网报道:

昨晚大盘冲高回落下来,而且回落的比较多,从目前走势来看,整体大盘暂时会在57500-59500区间在走一波横盘,而以太快速突破2750这个位置,但是受到大盘冲高回落下来影响,短期整体会在2620-2720区间在走,sol昨天虽然突破150,不过没能有效突破,暂时会在141-150区间在走。

7月美国CPI数据出炉,通胀率终于缓了口气,同比上涨2.9%,这可是自2021年3月以来头一回掉到“2”时代,还连着四个月往下掉,跟大伙儿心里想的差不多。但奇怪的是,这好消息一出,市场反而跌了,咋回事?

预期里头早就有数了

通胀降温这事儿大家心知肚明,数据一出没新意,投资者就想着赶紧套现走人。经济衰退的阴云还没散

就算CPI看着还行,可金融机构的模型还是说衰退风险大了去了,市场心里没底儿。市场自个儿也得喘口气

连续涨那么多,技术性回调在所难免,尤其是经济和政策走向还那么模糊的时候。7月的CPI数据算是给9月降息开了个好头,降息25个基点的可能性有六成。虽然通胀放缓是好事,可大伙儿对经济前景和政策变动还是心里打鼓,这么一合计,市场就跌了。

66088f912954c1672405dfe7426e2cad.jpeg

每一次牛市的爆发,都是不知不觉的的

行情起起伏伏,周期性强,SCF去1亿还没过去多久呢,市场就充斥着唱空SOL的声音,判断一个币能否去1亿,需要盯盘,看庄的实力和野心,风格,意图,还有大户的持仓意志,庄拉盘,如果大户都在卖,也没用,需要多方配合,达成默契,rocky当时判断很难去1亿,后面有机会去,但是被大户砸崩了,有2-3个大户做纸手,都有难度。节奏要把握的很好,拖太久都不行。

我们做为散户规避风险的能力甚至比盈利重要,这就是为了少亏钱,提高胜率,有人不在乎胜率,追求暴击,为自己亏钱找借口,除非不玩了,不然看谁笑到最后。这市场没有谁是常胜将军,任何人都不需要去羡慕任何人。

有的人执着于聪明钱,特别是现在的三无币,只能跟着聪明钱玩。看一两个人没什么用,都是在这市场博弈, 所谓的聪明钱都只是其中一个因素,链上数据也别太相信。数据 热度 交易量 K线 聪明钱 庄家控盘 叙事板块 不要执着于某一个因素,前排不代表整体,K线是整体数据的反应。开盘20多倍了,还跟着聪明钱上,愚蠢至极。

对于老鼠仓太多的币,尽量远离,别跟狗庄玩,掌握绝对筹码, 庄家在不同市值都能大致计算出盈利 ,赚钱的和亏钱的是否平衡,市场内部能否消化掉。如果成立,他不需要多少资金就能拉上去,就算花了点成本,在下跌途中,玩家的买单都是送给他的。

今日关注

今晚的失业金数据仍然是市场的重要关注点,将直接影响接下来的走势。BTC 预期可能是先在 59700-60000u 附近反弹,然后回调至57800u附近。

随着晚间失业金数据公布,市场可能再次回调至56700u 附近,值得重点关注。

当下最值得关注的山寨币

山寨方面绝大多数山寨都在跟随比特币回调,最近两天妖币又销声匿迹了,等着比特币企稳,妖币还会出来的,但是基本上都不会太持久,拉一波就阴跌回到起点。市场的资金在各个币之间快速流动,游资打一枪换一个地方,有些币的主力则是在默默的一点一点吸筹。

最近几天是铭文的链上有异动,一方面是sats的带动,一方面也是没什么新的叙事,短期异动也能说明铭文在接下来的牛市下半场,依然会成为炒作的热点。山寨还是要做好现货中长期的布局,交易活跃的相对小市值的山寨是很好的抄底标的,避开币安观察区的代币,会相对安全一些。HIFI T SAGA 可以重点关注。

Leituras Relacionadas

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHá 41m

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHá 41m

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHá 1h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片