香港将在 18 个月内加强数字资产监管

tokeninsight_newsPublicado em 2024-08-12Última atualização em 2024-08-12

根据 Cointelegraph 报道：香港正着手建立全面的监管框架,旨在吸引全球金融科技人才,促进创新,并确保数字资产交易的安全性和完整性。

作为成为全球金融科技中心的使命的一部分,香港将在未来18个月内加强其数字资产监管。

在"2024年远景"年度峰会上,香港特别行政区立法会议员邱腾华概述了该市吸引技术人才、建设新基础设施和建立强有力的立法监管的战略计划。

建立健全的数字资产框架
邱强调,这一倡议对未来5到10年的科技产业至关重要。"数字资产行业在过去几年中取得了重大进展,但我们仍处于非常早期的阶段,"邱说。"我们应该建立一个健全的交易所系统,并尽快引入与稳定币相关的法律。"

预计香港将在2024年底前引入与法定货币挂钩的加密货币稳定币。

根据邱的说法,沙盒测试已经开展,政府计划在1到1.5年内加强对与数字资产金融产品相关立法的监管和执法。下一步将鼓励项目方在香港探索更多创新的金融产品。

稳定币沙盒

香港金融管理局最近在7月18日宣布了其稳定币发行商沙盒的首批参与者。参与者包括一家与大型中国电商零售商有关联的公司、一家本地金融科技公司,以及渣打银行、Animoca Brands和香港电讯组成的联盟。

京东联链科技也是参与者之一,计划发行与港元挂钩的1:1稳定币。

这一计划中的稳定币立法彰显了香港的亲加密金融方针,旨在促进创新同时确保监管监督。7月23日,中国最大的资产管理公司之一的嘉实基金管理公司在香港推出了亚洲首只比特币期货反向产品。

嘉实比特币期货每日(-1x)反向产品(7376.HK)紧随2022年12月该公司推出的比特币期货ETF(3066.HK)之后。

Leituras Relacionadas

Loss Exceeds $7.5 Million: Analysis of the Honeypot Attack Targeting MEV Bot and Tracking of Stolen Funds

On June 21, Jaredfromsubway.eth, one of Ethereum's most active MEV bots, suffered a sophisticated honeypot attack, losing over $7.5 million in crypto assets. Attackers deployed a complex contract system, including a coordinator, trigger, and fake token/pair contracts, to exploit the bot's arbitrage logic. The core attack trick involved baiting the bot with transactions: small trades appeared normal and consumed token approvals, while larger trades preserved these approvals by using fake swaps. This left the bot with large, unused approvals for assets like USDC, USDT, and WETH. The attacker then drained these approvals in a final step. The stolen funds—$2.87M USDC, $2.04M USDT, and 1,474 WETH—were consolidated and partially laundered through Tornado Cash. This incident highlights that MEV bots must not rely solely on simulated profits for security. Extra caution is required with unfamiliar contracts or custom wrappers in arbitrage paths, and post-transaction allowance checks are strongly recommended.

marsbitHá 11m

Loss Exceeds $7.5 Million: Analysis of the Honeypot Attack Targeting MEV Bot and Tracking of Stolen Funds

marsbitHá 11m

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

As the era of channel-driven growth ends, major tech giants like Coinbase, Stripe, and Kraken are vertically integrating by acquiring or building core infrastructure, capturing profits from underlying protocols. For instance, Coinbase leverages its Base blockchain to earn sequencing fees from protocols like Morpho, while Stripe acquired Bridge to internalize stablecoin yields, and Kraken bought NinjaTrader for derivatives licenses. This trend creates a power imbalance: entities controlling distribution channels can extract value from open-source DeFi protocols. However, protocols are developing a defense through multi-chain expansion. Examples like Morpho (with significant TVL on Ethereum and Base) and Uniswap (dominant across many chains) show that by deploying across multiple blockchains, protocols reduce dependency on any single chain operator, making them costly and risky to replace. The article argues that the future landscape will be shaped by the race between institutional vertical integration and protocol horizontal, multi-chain scaling. Protocols that embed themselves deeply across ecosystems and become indispensable due to high switching costs are most likely to survive and thrive amidst this consolidation.

Foresight NewsHá 29m

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

Foresight NewsHá 29m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbitHá 36m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbitHá 36m

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbitHá 51m

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbitHá 51m

This Generation of East Asian Commoners Enriched by TSMC and AI-related South Korean Stocks

An AI-driven stock market boom fueled by semiconductor giants like TSMC and Samsung is transforming personal finances and lifestyles across East Asia. Young professionals, such as 24-year-old South Korean programmer Na Se-bin who invested her life savings, are experiencing dramatic gains and losses, reflecting a widespread retail trading frenzy. In Taiwan, telling someone you work at TSMC has become a notable social advantage, while its stock surge has propelled the local market. Similarly, Korean markets, dominated by Samsung and SK Hynix, have seen massive growth, with even schoolteachers reporting quintupled investments. The AI hardware demand from U.S. tech giants is funneling trillions into Asian exports, creating a wealth effect evident in luxury spending and real estate. The phenomenon underscores the region's pivotal role as the "pick-and-shovel" suppliers of the AI revolution, reshaping ordinary lives through market participation and soaring tech sector salaries.

Odaily星球日报Há 54m

This Generation of East Asian Commoners Enriched by TSMC and AI-related South Korean Stocks

Odaily星球日报Há 54m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow