俄罗斯为何允许加密货币挖矿,合法后又意味着什么?

marsbitPublicado em 2024-08-10Última atualização em 2024-08-11

今天最火爆的消息莫过于,俄罗斯允许加密货币挖矿!堪称载入史册的里程碑事件。

根据塔斯社报道,俄罗斯总统普丁于8月8日签署了俄罗斯加密货币开采合法化法律,显示金砖国家联盟(BRICS)在数位货币领域发展迎来重要发展节点。

俄罗斯

让我们来看看,该法案主要涉及的主要内容:

引入了数位货币挖矿、矿池、挖矿基础设施营运商等新概念,将挖矿视为经济活动的一部分,而非单纯的数位货币发行。

只有在俄罗斯数位部门登记注册的俄罗斯法人和个体工商户才能合法挖矿。

未超过政府能源消费限额的普通公民也可在不注册的情况下进行小规模挖矿。

允许外国数位金融资产在俄罗斯区块链平台进行交易。如果对金融稳定构成威胁,俄罗斯央行有权禁止个别数位资产发行。

要求矿工向政府提供所挖数位货币讯息,确保遵守。

这并不是俄罗斯今年通过的第一项支持加密货币的法律。早在7月底,俄罗斯就决定允许在国际贸易中使用加密货币进行支付,以应对西方制裁。

俄罗斯开放加密货币意味着什么?

要知道,俄罗斯其实在比特币领域的参与度相当显著,堪称大玩家。早在2021年Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance数据统计就表明,美国是全球最大的比特币电力消耗国,占35.40%。

紧随其后的是哈萨克(18%)、俄罗斯(11.23%)、加拿大(9.6%)和爱尔兰(4.7%)。到了2024年7月,俄罗斯加密货币挖矿占全国电力消耗的1.6%。

俄罗斯

看着以上数据,如果把加密市场比喻成一场大型游戏,俄罗斯似乎早已是走出新手村的进阶玩家了。然而,事实并非如此,俄罗斯近年来在加密货币政策上始终摇摆不定。

在2017年之前俄罗斯政府和中央银行对加密货币持高度警惕,认为其风险较大,主要担忧可能用于非法活动,如洗钱等。

2019年俄罗斯开始探讨如何有效监管加密货币。在监管政策上,财政部倾向于较宽松的监管,而中央银行则主张严格控制,甚至建议禁止私人加密货币的使用。

到了2020年,俄罗斯通过《数位金融资产法》,该法律承认加密货币为财产,但禁止其用于支付商品和服务,标志着加密货币法律地位的初步确立。

随着时间的推移,俄罗斯政府在近两年对加密货币的态度逐渐变得更加积极。 2023年12月14日,俄罗斯财政部提出了新法案,旨在使比特币(BTC)挖矿合法化,并建立销售所开采货币的机制。

法案中包含禁止加密货币广告的条款,并要求透过外国平台进行加密货币销售,禁止使用俄罗斯的资讯基础设施。

到2024年5月,国家杜马金融市场委员会主席Anton Gorelkin表态反对完全禁止加密货币的流通,强调在法律框架内规范加密货币交易平台的重要性。

直到今天,俄罗斯正式将加密货币挖矿合法化。

从谨慎到开放,俄罗斯对加密货币挖矿的态度堪称180度大反转!普丁的这一系列政策调整反映出其希望寻求新的成长点,并在全球数位经济中占有一席之地的决心。

俄罗斯

我们来思考下,俄罗斯态度会出现如此大反转的原因究竟是什么?大概可以总结为以下几点:

1、应对西方制裁的需要

随着俄罗斯与西方国家的关系日益紧张,受到了一系列经济制裁。使用加密货币进行跨境支付和交易,可以帮助俄罗斯绕过制裁,增强与其他国家特别是非西方国家的贸易能力。

2、寻求新的经济成长点

俄罗斯政府意识到,加密货币和区块链技术蕴含着巨大的经济潜力。透过合法化加密货币挖矿和交易,可以为国家带来新的税收来源。财政部估计,从2023年开始,加密货币交易和挖矿活动的税收收入每年可以达到25亿卢布(约合3.4亿美元)。

3.发挥自身优势

俄罗斯在能源和运算能力方面具有一定优势,这为加密货币挖矿提供了良好的条件。 2022年,普丁总统与政府会晤时强调了由于该领域专家的存在和电力过剩,俄罗斯在加密货币挖矿领域具有优势。

4.监理框架的逐步完善

俄罗斯在2019年就开始探索如何有效监管加密货币,虽然财政部和央行在具体政策上存在分歧,但这为后来的政策转变奠定了基础。 2020年通过的《数位金融资产法》也标志着俄罗斯在加密货币法律地位上的重要一步。

总之,俄罗斯在加密货币挖矿方面的新规推出并非偶然,而是经过了一系列政策讨论和准备,政府逐步对加密货币产业敞开怀抱。

在这样重大利好的加持下,比特币也没有让市场失望,昨天一天从55000美金攀升至61000美金,创下有史以来单日第二市值涨幅! !而第一个市值涨幅发生在2021年2月8日上个多头市场,日内上涨19.54%!

俄罗斯

展望未来,随着加密货币政策的进一步完善和国际市场的变化,俄罗斯可能在全球数位经济中扮演越来越重要的角色。

比特币等数位资产的价格波动将持续吸引投资者的关注,而俄罗斯的政策导向也将对全球加密货币市场产生深远影响,同时也是俄罗斯面临的重要挑战。

随着川普和普丁等世界大国领导人对比特币的支持,加密货币逐渐被主流政府认可。这一转变标志着比特币从边缘走向中心,不断在国际金融市场中为全球经济多样化发展注入新动力。

Leituras Relacionadas

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 5h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 5h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 7h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHá 7h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Há 9h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Há 9h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 10h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHá 10h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片