金桥信息申请区块链跨网存验证专利,提供更安全、更高效的跨网区块链存验证服务模式

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-04Última atualização em 2024-08-04

币界网报道:

金融界 2024 年 8 月 4 日消息,天眼查知识产权信息显示,上海金桥信息股份有限公司申请一项名为“一种区块链跨网存验证方法及系统“,公开号 CN202410517502.5,申请日期为 2024 年 4 月。

专利摘要显示,本发明提供了一种区块链跨网存验证方法及系统,其中方法包括以下步骤:在区块链平台上,获取存验证请求;对所述存验证请求进行加密和处理;所述加密和处理后的存验证请求通过前置摆渡数据库实现外网到内网的数据摆渡;所述加密和处理后的存验证请求在所述内网获得结果数据,对所述结果数据进行加密;所述加密后的结果数据实现内网到外网的数据摆渡到所述前置摆渡数据库,对所述加密后的结果数据解密后发送所述结果数据到请求侧。

本文源自:金融界

作者:情报员

Leituras Relacionadas

Uncovering the Secret Reasoning Chains of Claude Opus for $720: A Leak via Haiku, with GPT and Gemini Also Affected

Researchers discovered a method to extract hidden reasoning traces, or "Chain of Thought" (CoT), from major proprietary large language models (LLMs) like Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8, OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol, and Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro. The attack exploits a design flaw in how these models handle encrypted reasoning "blobs." These blobs, which contain a model's internal reasoning steps, are encrypted and sent to the client for storage between conversation turns to save server costs. The researchers found these blobs were encrypted with a global key, allowing them to be reused across different sessions, users, and, crucially, different models from the same company. By taking an encrypted reasoning blob generated by a powerful "flagship" model and feeding it to a smaller, less capable model from the same family (e.g., feeding Claude Opus's blob to Claude Haiku), the researchers could prompt the smaller model to divulge the hidden CoT. This bypassed the need to crack the encryption directly. The implications are significant: 1) Competitors could potentially distill high-value reasoning data at low cost (estimated at ~$720 for 10,000 traces). 2) Sensitive information like API keys, passwords, and personal emails, which models might process internally but not output, could be leaked. The team found such leaks in 4.9% of analyzed public agent logs. 3) Models might internally analyze dangerous queries (e.g., car theft methods) before refusing to answer, but this dangerous analysis could be extracted from the CoT. 4) Malicious instructions could potentially be hidden within a reasoning blob to influence a model's future behavior. While the vulnerability was responsibly disclosed and patched by the affected companies, the research highlights a fundamental tension between the convenience of portable reasoning states and security. The paper also notes preliminary tests found no clear evidence that open-source models like DeepSeek had been distilled from the extracted CoTs.

marsbitHá 5m

Uncovering the Secret Reasoning Chains of Claude Opus for $720: A Leak via Haiku, with GPT and Gemini Also Affected

marsbitHá 5m

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

**Title: Reverse Entrepreneurship: The Next Web3 Blockbuster May Come from Previously Failed Tracks** This article argues that the next major consumer crypto application is likely to emerge from a concept that failed five years ago, now benefiting from matured infrastructure and better timing. It examines several such "failed" tracks that hold renewed potential: 1. **Internet-Native Assets:** Beyond simply tokenizing tweets or creating digital collectibles, there's an opportunity to create a genuinely new, crypto-native asset class that captures cultural moments and online phenomena, as opposed to merely tokenizing real-world assets (RWA). 2. **X-to-Earn:** While unsustainable token emission models doomed early projects like STEPN, the core premise that most people will first *earn* crypto, not buy it, remains valid. The future challenge is designing what is earned and why users would hold it long-term. 3. **The Metaverse:** Past failures like Decentraland stemmed from trying to replicate the physical world online. The opportunity lies not in abandoning shared online social spaces, but in reimagining their form beyond real-world analogs. 4. **DAOs:** DAOs have underdelivered by overcomplicating governance. The fundamental, unmet user need is simpler: enabling groups of internet strangers to pool funds and collectively achieve goals (e.g., buying assets, funding projects) that are impossible individually. 5. **Personal Value Tokenization:** Numerous attempts (Friend.tech, BitClout) to create markets around individuals have failed. The enduring demand for "person-as-asset" trading (seen in meme coins, prediction markets) suggests the direction isn't wrong, but the execution has been flawed, often lacking creator consent or a less commodified model. The conclusion is that true innovation will come from revisiting these past ideas with new insights, rather than crowding into currently popular trends.

marsbitHá 15m

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

marsbitHá 15m

Liang Wenfeng Launches Surprise Attack on Musk: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs. Grok 4.6, First Tests Are Spectacular

**DeepSeek V4 Pro vs. Grok 4.6: A Benchmark and Real-World Showdown** In a dramatic AI clash, DeepSeek V4 Pro and Elon Musk's Grok 4.6 launched head-to-head, targeting long-task capabilities like tool calling and code validation. **Benchmark Performance:** DeepSeek V4 Pro excelled in Agent tests, topping CyberGym (83.3) and AutomationBench (31.8), surpassing models like Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.8. It closed the gap on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (87.9) and saw massive gains in DeepSWE (software engineering). Grok 4.6 matched GPT-5.6 in overall ability (61 index), outperformed it in coding (CursorBench 69.9%), and led in three knowledge-work evaluations, including legal tasks (Harvey LAB, 15.8%). **Pricing Disruption:** DeepSeek's standout feature is its radically low cost: $0.87 per million output tokens—roughly 1/7th of Grok 4.6 ($6) and a tiny fraction of rivals like Fable 5 ($50). **Real-World Tests:** In practical challenges, both models demonstrated impressive skill. DeepSeek V4 Pro built a 3D interactive Earth, websites, 60 design styles, and a polished Flappy Bird clone (costing only $0.019 vs. Grok's $0.03 for a simpler version). Head-to-head comparisons were tight: Grok 4.6 won on some design aesthetics, while DeepSeek often delivered higher visual detail and completeness. However, in complex tasks like generating a Three.js cherry blossom tree, V4 Pro lagged behind GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5. **Conclusion:** The simultaneous release signals a shift: high-end AI capability is becoming dramatically more affordable. DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.6 now compete directly with top-tier models from OpenAI and Anthropic, promising to democratize powerful AI tools and fuel an application explosion. The race continues, with Grok 4.7 and counter-moves from incumbents already anticipated.

marsbitHá 30m

Liang Wenfeng Launches Surprise Attack on Musk: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs. Grok 4.6, First Tests Are Spectacular

marsbitHá 30m

Trading

Spot
活动图片