IoTex 2.0 如何推动DePIN革命?

币界网Publicado em 2024-07-18Última atualização em 2024-07-18

币界网报道:

来源:陈剑 来源:X,@jason_chen998

全流通的Depin龙头IoTex发布2.0版本

今天,作为全流通的Depin龙头,IoTex正式发布了2.0版本。距离1.0版本的发布已经过去了整整7年,新版本的白皮书内容丰富,体现了团队强烈的做事意愿。如下图Roadmap所示,2.0版本的主要基调是将原本的一个物联网Layer1公链彻底升级为一整套Depin解决方案与开放平台体系,也符合本次2.0的理念“属于所有人的AI和DePIN”。尽管表面上看起来只是像OP一样支持了在IoTex之上搭建Layer2,但具体的改进远不止这些,主要包括四部分:W3bstream、DIM、Public Good、经济模型。

W3bstream:链下计算与认证

作为Depin公链,最主要的职责是确保链下的众多设备的工作量是真实可信的,并及时上传至链上完成认证与奖励分发。W3bstream号称世界上第一个去中心化的链下计算网络,通过ZK、全同态加密、可信执行环境、多方计算实时生成现实世界活动证明,并将这些证明发布到链上,从而奖励设备的持有者。为了实现计算的快速性,IoTex最新发表的论文将ZKP的性能提升了30%,成为世界上最快的zkSNARK证明器。W3bstream还可以用于链下AI计算并确保计算过程的可信度,构建AI数据集,在这一点上与AO的位置相似。除此以外,还需要确保链上钱包与链下设备的一致性,和硬件设备接入的统一性,这在后续的DIM中也有相应解决方案。

DIM:模块化基础设施

DIM(Depin Infra Modules)通过一系列模块化的方式为Depin项目提供开箱即用的能力,首先包括MSP模块化安全池,打造Depin基础设施的统一可信层,从而让L2更快速地启动。由于Depin同时包括大量链上与链下的内容,需要从头构建自己的去中心化架构以提升可信度。MSP可以理解为Depin领域的Eigenlayer,包括三个角色:DIM的构建者、质押者和验证者。其中,构建者最为重要,即第三方开发者为Depin打造的数据流、处理、存储、自动化等模块。MSP提供了贿选机制,确保质押者可以从中获得足够的激励。

ioID的存在同样是为了解决Depin领域同时出现大量链上地址与链下设备交互时产生的身份不一致问题。ioID使用钱包地址作为链上身份,DID作为链下身份,并将其进行映射关联。链下设备的身份认证是一个难点,因为设备种类繁多。在ioID中,Depin设备可以通过集成IoTex的SDK直接在设备内即时生成DID,即为每个设备创建一个NFT。用户通过MetaMask登录网站,存入最低10个IOTX Token作为设备启动过程中的Gas费,在设备生成好DID后,网站上读取到对应的DID并进行绑定注册,从而实现链上与链下的关联。

ioConnect:通用嵌入式SDK

ioConnect是一个通用嵌入式SDK,用于消除Depin硬件设备的复杂性。尽管ioID可以为各种不同类型的硬件生成DID,但硬件设备和芯片种类繁多、标准不统一的问题依然存在。为此,IoTex开发了更通用的标准SDK,易于硬件设备接入联网。

ioDDK:构建L2应用链

在DIM的最后是ioDDK,允许Depin项目基于IoTex之上搭建L2应用链,并继承IoTex的安全性。IoTex上线这些年里,没有发生过一起宕机事故或黑客盗窃事件。

除了DIM提供的模块化组件外,IoTex在Public Good领域也提供了DePinScan,用于让用户、矿工和投资者监控Depin项目的增长情况,从而发现早期项目。DePin Liquidity Hubs是一个专门用于Depin Token的Dex,为早期Depin项目提供流动性。

经济模型:通胀与通缩机制

最后是经济模型的调整。在2.0版本中,IoTex同时具备通胀和通缩机制,形成动态的平衡对冲。在通胀方面,IoTex的质押节点将收到对应的Token作为奖励。同时,IoTex在2.0中引入了类似于以太坊的Gas燃烧通缩机制,使用ioID为设备创建链上身份时也需要销毁一定数量的Token。如果IoTex网络能够在业务层面实现良好的增长,则会形成一个正向飞轮,使用的人越多,Token销毁的数量也越多。

Leituras Relacionadas

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

DeepSeek has updated its DeepSeek V4 model with the DSpark speculative decoding framework, achieving a significant 60-85% speedup in generation for Flash models and 57-78% for Pro models while maintaining the same overall throughput. This engineering-focused update, rather than a core architectural change, introduces DSpark to address latency and throughput bottlenecks in high-concurrency production environments. DSpark combines high-throughput parallel generation with adaptive load-aware verification. Its key innovations include a semi-autoregressive generation architecture to model dependencies within token blocks and a hardware-aware confidence-scheduled verification system. This system uses a confidence head to predict token acceptance probabilities, allowing it to dynamically optimize verification length per request and allocate compute only to tokens with the highest expected payoff. The asynchronous scheduler is designed for real-world deployment, ensuring zero-overhead scheduling and continuous CUDA graph replay while preserving the target model's output distribution. In tests across mathematical reasoning, code generation, and daily dialogue, DSpark outperformed state-of-the-art models like Eagle3 and DFlash, increasing average acceptance length by 26.7%-30.9% and 16.3%-18.4% respectively on Qwen3 target models. DeepSeek also open-sourced DeepSpec, a full-stack codebase for training and evaluating speculative decoding draft models, providing a standardized toolkit that includes data preparation tools, model implementations, training code, and evaluation scripts.

marsbitHá 2h

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

marsbitHá 2h

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbitHá 3h

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbitHá 3h

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbitHá 3h

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
活动图片