尼日利亚“加密亿万富翁”因欺诈和资助恐怖主义指控被捕

币界网Publicado em 2024-07-17Última atualização em 2024-07-17

币界网报道:
    一位自称“加密货币亿万富翁”的人在尼日利亚被捕。Linus Williams面临欺诈和恐怖主义指控。

经过长期调查,尼日利亚警方证实逮捕了一名自称加密货币亿万富翁的人。

Linus Williams因各种与加密货币相关的犯罪而受到警方的关注,如欺诈、恐怖主义融资和不遵守法律标准。

加密货币亿万富翁面临恐怖主义指控

警方公共关系官员穆伊瓦·阿德霍比在X台报道了逮捕事件,并证实:,

FCID(NPF-NCCC)目前正在调查针对BLORD集团、BLORD房地产有限公司、BLORD JETPAYE有限公司和BILLPOINT TECHNOLOGY的投诉

他肯定地说,

“这些罪行包括对加密货币欺诈、协助互联网欺诈、计算机相关欺诈、恐怖主义融资以及不遵守监管框架的指控。”

根据官方报道,Linus Williams通过他的公司Blord Group of Companies犯下了资助恐怖主义和欺诈罪。

尼日利亚的加密货币犯罪

多年来,尼日利亚已成为网络犯罪的中心,特别是那些涉及加密货币进行欺诈和其他非法活动的犯罪。

据Chainalysis报道,2018年至2023年期间,尼日利亚的加密货币犯罪激增,2023年的犯罪额为242亿美元,2022年为396亿美元。

例如,Hushpupi因涉及学校融资、商业电子邮件和其他计划的网络欺诈罪被美国地方法院判处11年监禁。

此外,Woodberry先生对电汇欺诈认罪,并选择放弃800万美元的电汇欺诈和其他奢侈品收益。

因此,随着加密货币的普及和普及,犯罪分子利用数字资产窃取和欺骗无辜的受害者。

监管不力助长犯罪?

值得注意的是,自称加密货币亿万富翁的威廉姆斯过着富裕的生活,没有公认的商业活动。

根据该报告,尼日利亚加密货币行业的主要参与者不承认他是交易员或投资者。

同样,各种谣言声称Linus广泛参与了允许购买Tether[USDT]的加密货币交易平台。此外,他将使用当地货币购买比特币[BTC]。

这种活动在尼日利亚是非法的,主要的交易所平台不允许加密货币对拥有奈拉。

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbitHá 53m

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHá 53m

Trading

Spot
活动图片