Ondo Finance研报:与贝莱德合作,连接传统金融与Web3的RWA协议

火币成长学院Publicado em 2024-07-12Última atualização em 2026-06-26

Resumo

资产代币化市场预计到2030年将达到10万亿美元。

一、项目背景及介绍
BlackRock 的 CEO Larry Fink 认为代币化是金融的未来和市场的下一步演变,他的这一立场可能会影响其他主要金融游戏参与者的态度。正如我们在之前关于 Dusk Network 的研究中所强调的,Real World Assets(RWA,真实世界资产)正在成为加密货币行业中的重要资产类别。截至 2024 年 5 月,RWA 市场已超过 66 亿美元,反映了投资者对这一创新金融产品的日益兴趣。将 RWA 代币化并将其引入区块链可以在 DeFi(去中心化金融)中提供收益机会。资产代币化市场预计到 2030 年将达到 10 万亿美元。

Ondo Finance研报:与贝莱德合作,连接传统金融与Web3的RWA协议


 Source: Roland Berge
这个新兴市场的主要吸引力不仅仅是为 DeFi 提供收益机会。通过将资产数字化为代币,它实现了资产的碎片化——将国债、股票和房地产等资产分割为较小的份额。这一过程增强了流动性,并为拥有不同资本水平的投资者打开了投资机会的大门。
Chainlink 用下面的插图解释了资产代币化的运作方式。它的主要优点包括通过可互操作的代币化资产增加流动性和提高可访问性,使小额投资者能够以相对较低的资本投资高收益资产。此外,由于许多区块链的公共性质,它提高了透明度,并通过将真实世界资产的价值连接到 DeFi 生态系统中,增强了组合性。

Ondo Finance研报:与贝莱德合作,连接传统金融与Web3的RWA协议


Source: Chainlink
美国代币化政府债券的市值也从 2023 年的 1.14 亿美元增长到 8.45 亿美元,Franklin Templeton(富兰克林邓普顿)是这一资产类别的最大发行者,占市场的约 38% 。安永(EY)的最新研究表明, 64% 的高净值投资者和 33% 的机构投资者计划在 2024 年底前增加对代币化国债的投资。

Ondo Finance研报:与贝莱德合作,连接传统金融与Web3的RWA协议

虽然仍处于起步阶段,但资产代币化代表了区块链技术最有前景和潜力的应用之一。Ondo Finance(Ondo 金融)凭借其国债代币化服务,处于这一趋势的有利位置,投资者兴趣持续增长。
二、技术架构
Ondo 正在通过其去中心化协议改造金融,利用区块链提供机构级产品。通过将传统金融中的稳定资产代币化,Ondo 将可靠性与区块链的效率相结合。Ondo 有两个主要部门:资产管理和技术。资产管理部门创建并监督代币化金融产品,而技术部门则开发支持这些产品的协议。
目前,Ondo Finance 提供两种不同的投资选择:
(1)USDY(Ondo US Dollar Yield Token)
由短期美国国债和银行存款支持的代币化票据。
提供 5.30% 的年化收益率(APY),总锁仓量(TVL)为 3.1535 亿美元。
比传统的稳定币(如 USDT/USDC)更安全、更透明。
由 Ankura 信托公司管理,以确保合规性和投资者保护。

Ondo Finance研报:与贝莱德合作,连接传统金融与Web3的RWA协议


Source: Ondo Finance
(2)OUSG(Ondo 短期美国国债)
为被动投资者提供低风险的代币化短期美国国债。
提供 4.81% 的年化收益率(APY),总锁仓量(TVL)为 2.2132 亿美元。
2024 年 3 月将投资从 BlackRock 的 SHV 转移到 BUIDL。
Ondo 最近推出了新版的 OUSG,名为 rOUSG,为投资者通过额外的 rOUSG 代币提供收益。

Ondo Finance研报:与贝莱德合作,连接传统金融与Web3的RWA协议


Source: Ondo Finance
三、产品及发展路线
Ondo Finance 旨在通过公共区块链技术连接传统金融和去中心化金融。他们的重点是创建安全、透明和合规的金融产品。
OUSG:代币化 BlackRock 短期美国国债 ETF。
OMMF:代币化 BlackRock 货币市场基金。
USDY:收益稳定币的替代品。
Flux Finance:支持代币化证券作为抵押品的协议。
在下一阶段,他们旨在代币化公开交易的证券,解决与流动性和基础设施相关的挑战。最终,Ondo 希望通过将区块链的优势扩展到更广泛的金融服务领域,在传统金融中创新,使用集中和去中心化机制的结合。这种方法将有助于将区块链技术的优势带到更广泛的金融操作中。
这些产品推动了显著增长,Ondo 的 TVL 从 4000 万美元增加到 5.34 亿美元。展望未来,Ondo 计划通过增加 USDY、OUSG 和 OMMF 的采用和流动性,扩展其代币化现金等价物的使用。这将涉及建立合作伙伴关系和开发跨链工具以促进这些过程。
由 Ondo Finance 团队创建的 Flux Finance 是去中心化借贷的一个重要进展。它基于 Compound V2,但增加了新功能。它支持 USDC 等开放代币和 OUSG(Ondo Short-Term US Government Bond Fund)等受限制代币。这意味着您可以自由借出 USDC,但使用 OUSG 作为抵押借款需要满足特定的许可要求,以确保合规性和安全性。Flux 使用类似于 Compound 的点对池(p2p ool)模式,允许用户以超额抵押的方式进行借贷。贷方可以赚取他们提供的稳定币的利息,而借款人可以使用他们的抵押品借入稳定币,并遵循资产的许可要求。Flux Finance 由 Ondo DAO 治理。
四、竞品情况
鉴于 Ondo 与像 BlackRock 这样的巨头建立了关系,Ondo 在加密 RWA 类别中似乎正在传统金融中崭露头角,补充其他 TradFi 公司。在去中心化金融领域,竞争正在加剧。Centrifuge 专注于代币化结构性信贷并使用 NFT 发行债务。Ethena 提供合成资产敞口,使用户能够在不持有资产的情况下进行交易。Maple Finance 向机构提供低抵押贷款,强调信用评估和放贷。Pendle 处理代币化收益交易,使用户能够分离和交易资产的收益部分。
Ondo Finance 脱颖而出有几个原因。它通过将传统金融与区块链整合,瞄准庞大的美国国债市场,具有广泛的市场覆盖率。其互补方法涉及与 BlackRock 等传统金融巨头合作,从而避免直接竞争。此外,Ondo 提供创新产品,如 USDY 和 OUSG,提供比传统稳定币更安全、更透明的替代方案。
五、代币经济
(1)ONDO 代币经济学摘要
市值排名:#54 
全面稀释估值(FDV):$ 131.5 B,排名#16 
流通供应量: 14.4 亿 ONDO(总供应量的 14.27% )
总供应量: 100 亿 ONDO
最大供应量: 100 亿 ONDO
下一次解锁: 167 万 ONDO(约$ 219 万), 5 天后
(2)代币分配

Ondo Finance研报:与贝莱德合作,连接传统金融与Web3的RWA协议


Source: Dropstab
(3)即将解锁事 I 件
2024 年 6 月 18 日: 167 万 ONDO(约$ 219 万)
2024 年 7 月 18 日: 167 万 ONDO(约$ 219 万)
2024 年 8 月 18 日: 167 万 ONDO(约$ 219 万)
2024 年 9 月 18 日: 167 万 ONDO(约$ 219 万)
2024 年 10 月 18 日: 167 万 ONDO(约$ 219 万)
2024 年 11 月 18 日: 167 万 ONDO(约$ 219 万)
2024 年 12 月 18 日: 167 万 ONDO(约$ 219 万)
2025 年 1 月 18 日: 19.4 亿 ONDO(约$ 25.5 B)
2026 年 1 月 18 日: 19.4 亿 ONDO(约$ 25.5 B)
2027 年 1 月 18 日: 19.4 亿 ONDO(约$ 25.5 B)
2028 年 1 月 18 日: 19.4 亿 ONDO(约$ 25.5 B)
(4)代币用途
ONDO 代币是 Ondo Finance 及其 Flux Finance 协议的治理代币。持有者有权对 Ondo DAO 内的各种提案进行投票,确保所有决策透明地在链上进行。要发起提案,个人必须持有或被委托至少 1 亿 ONDO 的投票权。目前尚不清楚未来是否会为 ONDO 持有者引入其他用途。
六、团队、融资历史与生态系统
Ondo Finance 团队拥有来自传统金融和Web3领域的多元化人员组合。创始人兼首席执行官 Nathan Allman 和总裁兼首席运营官 Justin Schmidt 均来自高盛。另一位重要成员 Katie Wheeler 则来自 BlackRock。此外,团队还包括来自 OpenSea、MakerDAO 和 Boson Protocol 的开发人员。这种专业知识的结合与 Ondo Finance 的独特愿景和目标高度一致。

Ondo Finance研报:与贝莱德合作,连接传统金融与Web3的RWA协议


 Source: Ondo Finance
种子轮:在 2021 年 12 月,Ondo Finance 以每代币$ 0.013 的价格筹集了$ 400 万,实现了 99.87 倍的投资回报(ROI)。共售出 3 亿代币(总供应量的 3% ),由 Pantera Capital 领投,设有 1 年初始锁定期,随后为 24 个月释放期。
公募轮: 2022 年 5 月 12 日,以每代币$ 0.03 的价格筹集了$ 1000 万,实现了 43.28 倍的投资回报(ROI)。共售出 1 亿代币(总供应量的 1% ),在 Coinlist 上进行,设有 1 年锁定期,随后为 18 个月释放期。
A 轮融资: 2022 年 4 月,以每代币$ 0.02 的价格筹集了$ 2000 万,实现了 64.92 倍的投资回报(ROI)。共售出 10 亿代币(总供应量的 10% ),由 Founders Fund 领投,设有 1 年初始锁定期,随后为 24 个月释放期。
Ondo Finance 已经形成了若干关键合作伙伴关系,以加强其区块链和金融服务:
Aptos Foundation:这次合作将显示世界资产与区块链技术的整合,从代币化美国国债产品 USDY 开始。
Thala Labs:合作推出 USDY 在 Thala 的 AMM 池中使用,并将其作为抵押债务头寸(CDP)的抵押品,增强流动性和 DeFi 解决方案。
Wintermute:合作以提高美元收益稳定币 USDY 的流动性,提供跨多个区块链平台的全天候流动性。
BlackRock:通过对 BlackRock 的 BUIDL 基金进行 9500 万美元的投资,展示了扩展代币化努力和与 Ondo 产品整合的承诺。
七、总结
Ondo Finance 脱颖而出有几个原因。它通过将传统金融与区块链整合,瞄准庞大的美国国债市场,具有广泛的市场覆盖率。其互补方法涉及与 BlackRock 等传统金融巨头合作,从而避免直接竞争。此外,Ondo 提供创新产品,如 USDY 和 OUSG,提供比传统稳定币更安全、更透明的替代方案。
利好因素:
代币化行业将迎来显著增长,Ondo Finance 与 BlackRock 的合作,战略性地定位于将数万亿美元引入Web3。
Ondo Finance 的 TVL 自 2024 年初以来实现了大幅增长。 真实世界资产在加密领域代表着一个新鲜而有前景的叙事,具有强大的早期采用潜力。
Ondo Finance 致力于发展其产品,以满足客户需求。
大多数 OUSG 的投资最初是在 BlackRock 的 iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF(SHV)中。2024 年 3 月,他们转向 BlackRock 的 USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund(BUIDL),与 Ondo 的资产代币化重点一致。
Ondo Finance 是加密 RWA 领域的领先者,成为首选。
Ondo Finance 持有 BUIDL 当前供应量的约 38% 。
利空因素:
ONDO 代币的用途显示出显著的集中化风险。
尽管所有持有者都可以参与治理,但最大的持有者拥有最大的影响力。
大约 85% 的总 ONDO 供应量由 Ondo Finance 团队控制。
在 TradFi 和加密货币的交汇处运营,Ondo Finance 进入了一个相对未开发的市场,监管构成了重大挑战。
不良债务是包括 Ondo Finance 的 Flux 在内的 DeFi 协议的主要风险。当借款人的抵押品价值低于其债务时,就会发生不良债务。如果借款人的权益变为负数,Flux 将使用其储备金来缓解损失。为了尽量减少波动性并降低不良债务风险,Flux 仅接受稳定资产作为抵押品。

Criptomoedas em alta

Leituras Relacionadas

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

"Glue Finance founder argues Ethereum's current price underperformance stems from its 'unfinished machine' status. Despite record usage and settlement value in 2026, ETH remains below its 2021 peak because the protocol's continued development creates a dependency on the Ethereum Foundation for guidance and fixes. Key issues include centralized L2 sequencers, governance-based freezes (as seen with Arbitrum), state bloat, a vulnerable public mempool, and looming quantum computing threats. This 'dependency discount' prevents ETH from accruing the 'ossification premium' that markets award to immutable, trustless systems like Bitcoin. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed escape paths: a 'war mode' shift towards centralization for speed (which would sacrifice Ethereum's core value), or simply replacing the EF with another governing body. The only solution is the 'Manhattan Plan' or 'Lean Ethereum': a concerted, accelerated effort to complete and then *freeze* the protocol's neutral core. This involves finalizing critical upgrades in consensus (Lean Consensus), scaling (targeting 1 trillion gas/sec), quantum resistance (leanXMSS signatures), and full ZK-provable execution. The goal is to pass the 'walk-away test'—where Ethereum could run forever, neutrally, without the EF. Success would transform Ethereum into the first programmable, quantum-resistant, immutable global settlement layer, flipping its current discount into a unique 'eternity premium' that surpasses Bitcoin's. Failure—stagnation or trading neutrality for speed—would relegate it to being a slower, less trustworthy competitor."

marsbitHá 22m

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

marsbitHá 22m

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

Glue Finance founder argues that Ethereum's current price underperformance, despite high on-chain activity, stems from its incomplete state and lingering dependency on central stewards like the Ethereum Foundation. The core thesis is that the market is discounting ETH not for lack of use, but because the protocol remains a "machine under construction." Key unresolved issues include centralized L2 sequencers with limited escape hatches, state bloat, vulnerable public mempools, and the looming quantum computing threat. This perpetual "work-in-progress" status forces reliance on a small group of maintainers, undermining the network's promise of credible neutrality and immutability. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed paths: a "wartime mode" of centralizing for speed (surrendering Ethereum's unique value) or merely replacing the Foundation with another governing entity. The only solution is to complete and then "freeze" the protocol's neutral core through a focused "Manhattan Project" dubbed "Lean Ethereum." This project aims to bundle critical upgrades—consensus layer overhaul, massive scaling via ZK-proofs, quantum resistance, and statelessness—into a decisive push to finalize the base layer. Once the core rules are cryptographically solidified and beyond anyone's control (passing the "walk-away test"), Ethereum would shed its dependency discount and earn a "rigidity premium" for its credible neutrality and programmability, potentially surpassing Bitcoin's valuation. The race is between completing this hardening and the risks of protocol capture or stagnation.

链捕手Há 24m

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

链捕手Há 24m

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbitHá 1h

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbitHá 1h

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbitHá 1h

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ONDO

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de OndoFinance (ONDO) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar OndoFinance (ONDO) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu OndoFinance (ONDO)Depois de comprar o teu OndoFinance (ONDO), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona OndoFinance (ONDO)Transaciona facilmente OndoFinance (ONDO) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

423 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar ONDO

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ONDO (ONDO) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片