若“懂王”当选，加密货币或成为主要的“特朗普交易”！

jin10Publicado em 2024-06-25Última atualização em 2024-06-25

Bernstein分析师表示，在当前选举周期中，随着共和党前景较好且该党领袖特朗普越来越支持加密货币，加密货币可能成为新的“特朗普交易”。

Gautam Chhugani和Mahika Sapra在周一发布的一份报告中写道，共和党人认为对加密货币行业采取友好态度，既是一种赢得选民的方式，也是从支持亲加密货币政客的超级政治行动委员会（Super PAC）那里获得竞选资金的方式。

最初的“特朗普交易”概念是在特朗普2016年赢得总统选举后，美国股市、美债收益率和美元同时飙升的情况下提出的。根据这份报告，如果特朗普这次获胜，将导致加密货币的反弹，这得益于机构采用和监管环境的改善。

分析师写道：“共和党不仅将加密货币视为票仓，而且视其为重要的资金来源。如果选举情绪进一步向共和党倾斜，加密货币最终将成为主要的‘特朗普交易’，对有利的监管制度的希望将改变围绕区块链‘使用案例’的叙事。”

本月早些时候，特朗普在Mar-a-Lago与几家比特币矿商的领导人会面，并表达了他对加密货币的支持。他表示，如果再次当选总统，他将成为加密货币矿业的倡导者。

特朗普后来在他的Truth Social账户上发帖称，他希望所有剩余的比特币都是“美国制造！！！”

尽管他发出了亲加密货币的信号，但TD Cowen的一份报告显示，如果特朗普当选，他仍可能重新成为加密货币怀疑者。

Cowen的报告指出，特朗普在2024年首场总统辩论中对加密货币的言论，将成为其潜在政府监管行动的风向标。报告称：“如果他没有表现出完全支持的态度，这可能会加剧人们的焦虑，即如果他再次当选，他将回到第一任期时对加密货币的怀疑态度。”

报告还指出，拜登可能在当地时间周四的辩论中重新定位自己对加密货币的立场。

在拜登政府期间，美国证券交易委员会（SEC）因其对加密货币交易平台的严厉打压，而遭到加密货币倡导者的批评。即便如此，由于SEC今年早些时候批准了现货比特币和以太坊ETF，许多观察人士认为SEC的立场正在软化。

现货比特币ETF已促使全球最大的加密货币获得机构采用，并使其今年上涨近37%。即使现货以太币ETF尚未正式上市，该代币今年也上涨了近40%。

Cowen的报告称：“我们敦促交易者谨慎对待任何候选人关于加密货币的言论。其言论可能很重要，但我们最终认为，假设候选人都能兑现承诺将是错误的。”

Leituras Relacionadas

World Models Shift from Prediction to Planning: HWM and the Challenge of Long-Horizon Control

World models have evolved from focusing on representation learning and future prediction to addressing long-horizon planning challenges. While models like V-JEPA 2 demonstrate strong predictive capabilities using large-scale video pre-training, they struggle with multi-stage control tasks due to error accumulation and exponential growth in action search space. HWM (Hierarchical World Model) introduces a two-level planning structure: a high-level planner outlines coarse subgoals over longer time horizons, while a low-level executor handles short-term actions. This decomposition reduces planning complexity and error propagation. In experiments, HWM achieved 70% success in real-world robotic tasks where flat models failed entirely. Complementary efforts include V-JEPA (focused on representation), HWM (on hierarchical planning), and WAV (World Action Verifier, on self-correction). Together, they mark a shift from pure world modeling to integrated systems capable of prediction, planning, and verification—key to deploying world models in real-world agents and long-term tasks.

marsbitHá 25m

World Models Shift from Prediction to Planning: HWM and the Challenge of Long-Horizon Control

marsbitHá 25m

BIT Research: Five Signals Flash Simultaneously, Has the Bitcoin Bear Market Ended?

According to a BIT research report, multiple independent technical indicators are signaling that the Bitcoin bear market, which began in October 2025, may be nearing its end or has already concluded. Unlike the prolonged 2022 bear market, the current cycle shows structural changes due to the introduction of spot Bitcoin ETFs and reduced regulatory uncertainty, limiting excessive downside volatility. Key technical signals include: the weekly stochastic oscillator rising above 20 (historically a bottoming signal), price approaching the critical 21-week moving average (~$77,592), and the monthly RSI potentially moving above its average. Additionally, Bitcoin is testing the key resistance zone of $66,000–$73,000. A decisive break above $73,084 (the March 2024 high) would confirm a trend reversal. The convergence of these five signals—rather than any single indicator—increases confidence that the market is transitioning from a downtrend to a bottoming phase. The focus now shifts to whether price can sustain a breakout, potentially targeting $88,000 or higher, with $64,972 acting as crucial support. The report emphasizes that while trends are improving, investors should remain cautious and consult professionals, as digital asset trading carries significant risk.

marsbitHá 35m

BIT Research: Five Signals Flash Simultaneously, Has the Bitcoin Bear Market Ended?

marsbitHá 35m

Bitcoin Created By The CIA? Chinese Professor Jiang Xueqin Makes Bold Claim

Chinese-Canadian educator Jiang Xueqin claimed Bitcoin was likely created by U.S. intelligence agencies like the CIA or NSA, rather than the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto. He argued that only state-level actors would have the resources and motive to develop such technology, suggesting Bitcoin serves purposes like surveillance and covert financing. He also questioned early large investments, like those from the Winklevoss twins, as suspicious. The Bitcoin community strongly rejected these claims. Commentators like Ansel Lindner and Lyn Alden argued that Jiang fundamentally misunderstands Bitcoin’s decentralized, open-source nature. They emphasized that Bitcoin’s value lies in its transparency and distributed network, which operates independently of any central control, making its origins irrelevant. At the time of reporting, BTC was trading at $74,886.

bitcoinistHá 39m

Bitcoin Created By The CIA? Chinese Professor Jiang Xueqin Makes Bold Claim

bitcoinistHá 39m

Breaking the RWA Value Monopoly: Zoomex Launches SpaceX Token Airdrop Carnival, Sharing a $300,000 Reward Pool

Leading digital asset trading platform Zoomex has launched the SpaceX Token, a real-world asset (RWA) token offering exposure to the high-value private company SpaceX. Valued at $1.25 trillion, SpaceX represents a landmark in private asset tokenization and pre-IPO liquidity. To celebrate, Zoomex is hosting an airdrop carnival with a $300,000 reward pool. The event features two tracks: a $60,000 pool for retail users completing simple tasks like deposits or trading, and a $240,000 pool for VIP users with tiered rewards. Zoomex emphasizes fairness, security, and compliance, using anti-abuse systems and operating within licensed frameworks. The initiative aims to democratize access to elite tech investments and simplify trading for users worldwide.

TheNewsCryptoHá 1h

Breaking the RWA Value Monopoly: Zoomex Launches SpaceX Token Airdrop Carnival, Sharing a $300,000 Reward Pool

TheNewsCryptoHá 1h

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot

Futuros