CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-04-08Última atualização em 2024-04-09

Resumo

Countries have varying definitions and categorizations for stablecoins that may pose a risk to financial stability, the report by the Financial Stability Institute said.

  • Countries around the world must ensure consistency in their approaches to regulating stablecoins, a new report by the Financial Stability Institute says.
  • Differing approaches could pose challenges to an integrated financial system, the FSI added in its report.

Countries need to make their regulatory frameworks for stablecoins consistent with one another, the Financial Stability Institute (FSI) warned in a report published Tuesday.

The FSI, jointly created by the Bank for International Settlements and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, is tasked with assisting regulators worldwide in strengthening their financial systems. The institute's report on policy implementation insights for stablecoins – which refers to cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to other assets such as sovereign currencies – warns of the dangers of fragmentation in supervision across the world.

"Stablecoins may still be unregulated or lightly regulated in other jurisdictions," said the report, authored by FSI Deputy Chair Juan Carlos Crisanto and Senior Advisors Johannes Ehrentraud and Denise Garcia Ocampo.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The authors argued that while many regulatory approaches have similarities when it comes to key requirements, the differences are largely driven by the variety of stablecoin design features and perceived risks. The report warned that this fragmentation in approaches to supervision could pose challenges to an integrated financial system and threaten financial stability.

Nations around the world have been exploring how to regulate stablecoins for several years. The U.K., for instance, passed legislation to recognize stablecoins as a means of payment in 2023, while the European Union passed the landmark Markets in Crypto Assets regulation (MiCA) to supervise issuers and service providers handling stablecoins. Japan too has started regulating stablecoins, while the U.S. is considering a stablecoin bill.

The FSI report says jurisdictions have varying definitions and categorizations for stablecoins that may pose a risk to financial stability. There are also discrepancies in requirements for the disclosure of reserve assets kept by stablecoin issuers to maintain the crypto's value against its reference currency.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"A consistent regulatory framework, as well as its global implementation, is essential to address stablecoins’ risks, prevent regulatory arbitrage and ensure a level playing field in the digital asset ecosystem," the FSI report said.

Ensuring the interoperability of stablecoins with central bank digital currencies (CBDC) and other digital assets would also be key to promoting an integrated financial system, the report added.

Global organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Financial Stability Board (FSB) have issued or are working on universal norms for stablecoins.

Edited by Sandali Handagama.

Leituras Relacionadas

Idle Macs Can Also Make Money? An Overview of Eigen Labs' Decentralized AI Inference Network Darkbloom

AI inference is becoming a crucial layer of internet infrastructure, yet it remains largely dependent on costly, capacity-limited centralized systems with potential security risks. Meanwhile, millions of powerful computers sit idle globally. Eigen Labs' Darkbloom network aims to utilize this idle capacity by enabling distributed AI inference on Mac computers, specifically those with Apple Silicon chips. Darkbloom's architecture consists of three components: users who send inference requests, a coordinator (operated by Eigen Labs) that routes these requests, and providers (Mac owners) whose machines run the models and return outputs without being able to see the request content. The system prioritizes privacy through a hardened provider process, software integrity checks, and hardware-supported attestation based on Apple's security architecture to ensure verifiable privacy. Economically, Darkbloom differs from traditional models. It leverages existing hardware, with marginal costs primarily driven by electricity, allowing it to offer pricing roughly 50% lower than major API aggregators. Providers keep 100% of the inference revenue, and the project does not rely on token subsidies; earnings come solely from real AI inference demand. However, early-stage earnings are modest, with top providers currently earning under $6 per day, influenced by factors like hardware specs, uptime, and network demand. The network currently supports models like Google's Gemma 4 and OpenAI's GPT-OSS via OpenRouter. To participate as a provider, users need an Apple Silicon Mac running macOS 14 or later, must install the Darkbloom provider software, and keep the machine online with a stable internet connection.

marsbitHá 14m

Idle Macs Can Also Make Money? An Overview of Eigen Labs' Decentralized AI Inference Network Darkbloom

marsbitHá 14m

Which Crypto Sectors Have Been "Eaten" by AI Agents?

The article examines which crypto sectors have been increasingly dominated by AI Agents and which remain human-centric. In certain high-speed, efficiency-driven areas, AI Agents have taken clear control. This includes derivatives/perpetuals trading, where bots outperform humans significantly (e.g., a contest showed 0% of AI Agents were liquidated vs. 43% of humans), arbitrage/MEV extraction, and yield optimization (with ~68% of new DeFi protocols in Q1 2026 featuring autonomous AI Agents). Spot trading and portfolio optimization are also seeing heavy Agent adoption. However, the shift is not universal. In "battleground" sectors, both Agents and humans coexist. In prediction markets, Agents dominate short-term arbitrage, but humans still outperform in long-term, nuanced judgment calls. In DeFi lending, while liquidation is automated, core deposit/borrow decisions remain largely human-driven. Sectors still firmly led by human activity include stablecoin payments and card-based spending (driven by real-world economic activity and remittances) and wallets, which serve as the crucial human-verification and approval layer. The rise of Agents increases the need for robust human-Agent verification layers. Projects like World/AgentKit, t54, Self Protocol, and Kite AI are building infrastructure to create trust, security, and accountability by binding Agents to verified human identities. In conclusion, while AI Agents have decisively "eaten" speed and optimization-focused crypto sectors, human judgment, trust, and real-world context remain dominant in areas that create broad economic value, such as payments and identity. The future likely involves a symbiotic relationship where Agents require human verification and oversight to operate effectively.

Foresight NewsHá 20m

Which Crypto Sectors Have Been "Eaten" by AI Agents?

Foresight NewsHá 20m

After Rising 11 Times in a Year, Micron's Earnings Report Becomes a Stress Test for the AI Memory Market

**Micron's Upcoming Earnings: A Crucial Test for the AI Memory Rally** Investors in AI memory stocks face a critical moment on June 24th, when Micron Technology reports quarterly earnings. The stock, having surged approximately 11-fold from $103 to $1,134 over the past year, carries immense market expectations. Wall Street consensus forecasts a staggering ~932% year-over-year jump in EPS to around $19.72 and ~270% revenue growth to ~$345 billion, largely driven by sold-out HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) capacity through 2026. Analysts have aggressively revised estimates upward over the last 90 days, with EPS expectations rising 68%. This creates a high bar: even strong results risk a sell-off if they fail to meet these elevated projections. Notably, price forecasts from institutions like Citi (predicting ~200% DRAM price increases in 2026) are already among the most bullish on Wall Street, not conservative. The key metric to watch is gross margin, guided to a record ~81%. Such peak profitability raises questions about sustainability in the historically cyclical memory sector. While management has signaled continued strength, the stock's direction post-earnings will likely hinge more on forward guidance for the next quarter and details on HBM capacity expansion for 2027, rather than the already-anticipated stellar past results. The report represents a major pressure test for the high-flying AI memory trade.

marsbitHá 25m

After Rising 11 Times in a Year, Micron's Earnings Report Becomes a Stress Test for the AI Memory Market

marsbitHá 25m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片