两年多首次!比特币上破5万美元大关

金十Publicado em 2024-02-13Última atualização em 2024-02-13

周一,比特币在两年多来首次突破5万美元。在经历了诸多加密丑闻和市场对该行业生存能力产生怀疑的惨败中,这无疑是一次引人注目的反弹。

在2022年暴跌64%后,比特币的价格已经增长了两倍,但仍低于2021年11月达到的近6.9万美元的历史高点。

自十多年前比特币问世以来,其价格的剧烈波动一直是吸引投机者的主要因素之一。尽管比特币最初被宣传为传统金融体系的替代品,但其最近的涨势受到了乐观情绪的推动,即上个月美国批准了比特币现货ETF,这将导致比特币得到更大程度的主流接受。

Miller Tabak & Co.首席市场策略师Matt Maley称,“有很多关于资金流入这一资产的传言。我还注意到,动能投资者也开始兴奋起来。”

行业潜在风险减少?

加密货币价格反弹之际,市场对宽松货币政策的预期增强了风险资产的吸引力。Cumberland Labs DeFi分析师Chris Newhouse表示,“风险偏好也蔓延到了数字资产领域。”

自2022年5月稳定币TerraUSD崩溃以来,比特币已经收复了所有损失,那次崩溃最终导致萨姆·班克曼-弗里德(SBF)的FTX交易所在2022年11月倒闭。

当FTX倒闭时,加密市场已经经历了几个月的溃败,对冲基金三箭资本(Three Arrows Capital)和贷款机构Celsius Network也被波及。但曾经是交易量最大的加密货币交易所之一的FTX的破产更具破坏性,随着流动性枯竭,比特币价格停滞不前。

如今,SBF被判犯有欺诈罪,币安交易所联合创始人赵长鹏因违反美国制裁和未能执行反洗钱政策而等待判决,分析师认为,该行业面临的潜在风险已经开始减少,这可能是加密货币价格上升的一大可能。

多重因素貌似正提振比特币?

1月11日,9只美国比特币现货ETF首次亮相,而成立十多年的灰度比特币信托(Grayscale Bitcoin Trust)在同一天转换为ETF。ETF的便利性有望扩大比特币的投资者基础。到目前为止,新基金已经吸引了大约90亿美元的资金

阻碍比特币此前涨势的灰度比特币投资信托(GBTC)抛售已经减少,比特币现货ETF的流入量再次激增超过5亿美元,其中富达FBTC ETF流入2.5亿美元,使得净流入总量(不包括GBTC的持续流出)达到2月份的最高水平,也是有记录以来的第二高水平。

加密货币托管公司Copper Technologies Ltd.的研究主管Fadi Aboualfa表示:

“狂热的买家带来了更多狂热买家,并进一步推高了比特币价格。在连续数周的上涨之下,加密货币势头强劲,当市场每周波动幅度超过10%,就像我们上周看到的那样时,加密货币很有可能进一步上涨。”

比特币将于4月份“减半”的四年一度的乐观情绪,也在加密货币领域蔓延开来,即矿工通过开采新区块而获得的比特币奖励数量减少了一半。基于历史先例,这一事件通常被视为对价格的支撑。

此外,季节性因素也可能正发挥作用,Fundstrat Global Advisors在一份报告中写道,除了ETF资金流入,在目前亚洲正在进行的农历新年假期期间,比特币的情绪“通常是积极的”。

Leituras Relacionadas

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbitHá 1h

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbitHá 1h

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHá 3h

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHá 3h

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHá 4h

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片