OSL 携瑞银完成全港首次投资级代币化权证分销模拟

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-02-12Última atualização em 2024-02-12

Resumo

这项举措有望改变香港的数字资产格局。

(香港, 2024 年 2 月 7 日)OSL 集团(863.HK,前称 BC 科技集团)作为香港唯一一家专注数字资产的上市公司,旗下 OSL 数字证券有限公司(下称“OSL”)今日宣布参与瑞银集团在香港的投资级代币化认股权证发行,并作为模拟销售试点。该项目由瑞银集团基于以太坊公链向 OSL 数字证券有限公司发行与股票挂钩的认购权证。

这项开创性举措有望改变香港的数字资产格局,以创新、性能、安全性和合规性为核心的 OSL 将联手瑞银推出该地区首个投资级代币化权证。

行业首创:股权挂钩代币化权证将进军香港数字资产市场

OSL 集团主席兼首席执行官潘志勇表示:“我们很荣幸与瑞银的区块链团队及产品专家合作,OSL 正在模拟股票挂钩结构性产品代币的整个产品生命周期,从代币铸币厂至模拟的第二市场交易,到代币最终在到期时销毁。随着这个投资级别的代币化金融产品发行,香港受规管虚拟资产的市场环境已跨过了另一个重要的里程碑。”

瑞银亚洲衍生产品销售部执行董事卓素华就这项交易表示︰”瑞银推出代币化认股证,加强了在香港作为衍生工具产品发行商的领导地位*。此项创新的产品在公共区块链许可环境中建立,能加强透明度、减低交易费、简化交收程序,且交易时段具有更大弹性。”

潘志勇补充道:“这是香港数字资产市场监管与合规发展的重要一步。在这个迅速变化的行业中,产品创新固然重要,但能够以一个合适的模式推动其产品对提升行业标准的关键同样不容忽视。这不仅代表了 OSL 的发展,也彰显了数字资产市场不断突破和制定新标准的重要性,展现了区块链技术的实际应用价值。我们期待与瑞银持续合作,利用区块链技术提升亚洲投资产品的分销能力,释放这项技术的革新潜力。”

此次 OSL 与瑞银的合作,不仅标志着双方在推动前沿金融产品方面迈出的重要一步,也为未来的创新奠定了坚实的基础,持续推动数字资产领域的发展

*资料来源︰香港交易所数据,#1 按已售出的权证及牛熊证的名义净值计算的 2021 至 2022 年市场份额。

关于 OSL

OSL 集团(863.HK,前称 BC 科技集团)是亚洲领先的金融科技和数字资产上市公司,旗下平台为全球首家获香港证监会发牌且受保的数字资产平台。公司成立于 2018 年,在相关领域具有悠久的历史,其全面且受监管许可的数字资产解决方案亦备受业界认可。

OSL 提供市场服务(经纪、交易所及托管)和软件即服务(SaaS)技术方案,为机构、和专业及零售投资者提供一流的数字资产平台交易服务及完全合规的资金池。 OSL 安全及受保的钱包,可确保数字资产安全存放和及时交易清算。

随着数字资产行业的不断发展,公司亦不断进步。OSL 简单而量身订制的服务,确保环球客户在不断发展的数字资产环境中获得合规的服务。

Leituras Relacionadas

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbitHá 1h

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbitHá 1h

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHá 4h

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHá 4h

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHá 4h

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片