India CBDC Insider Reveals Current Stance of Country's Central Bank

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-02-01Última atualização em 2024-02-02

Resumo

India’s central bank is weighing CBDC privacy technology and wouldn't plan to object if the government reduces its crypto tax, a senior official told CoinDesk.

  • The Reserve Bank of India is exploring technology as a means to address privacy risks in the use of a potential digital rupee, a senior official said.
  • The central bank likely wouldn't object if the government backs away from its crypto taxation, according to the official.
  • The RBI may be open to startups getting involved in its CBDC pilot programs in the future.

India’s central bank is taking a very cautious approach in developing its digital rupee, a senior official familiar with India’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot programs told CoinDesk, though it's making some progress.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is now looking into technology solutions to solve privacy concerns posed by a digital rupee, the official said. While the bank is maintaining a careful stance on crypto, the person said, it wouldn't plan to object if the government decided to reduce a controversial tax that has stifled the crypto industry. The RBI isn’t mandated with legislating taxes, so that decision falls out of its purview. However, the central bank has stepped beyond its role before to try to ban crypto, so its apparent willingness to stand back on this topic may be noteworthy.

The RBI has been pushing the adoption of wholesale and retail CBDC since late 2022 when it launched its pilot programs. India's central bank has publicly said it isn’t in a hurry to implement a full-scale, retail CBDC and has not shared any timeline. But recent events suggest a quiet urgency.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Numbers timeline

Last month, its retail CBDC hit a milestone of a million transactions in one day, but only with a little help from its friends, the banks. At least one bank revealed internally it had been encouraged to deposit employee funds and benefits in CBDC rather than fiat currency to help the RBI hit that milestone.

The official declined to reveal whether the milestone has become a daily occurrence or whether banks would continue to deposit employee funds in CBDC. The banks reportedly involved in this exercise – HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank, Canara Bank, IDFC First Bank and Union Bank of India – did not respond to CoinDesk’s requests for comment.

“The evolution of a CBDC requires experimentation and considerable efforts to make it a secure product for the nation, and that can take time,” the official remarked. “The settlement aspect is easy, but latency could be better.”

Privacy in digital rupee

The Indian central bank has added another narrative to the question of privacy in CBDC usage, which has been a point of concern for institutions and lawmakers around the world, including former U.S. president and currently the leading Republican Presidential candidate, Donald Trump.

Earlier, CoinDesk reported that the RBI would ask India's finance ministry to provide legal backing “in the form of legislation that will allow customers to delete transactions to maintain anonymity if they so choose to.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

However, the central bank is also looking for answers to the privacy question through technology.

“A privacy legislation is not the only way,” said the senior official. “Other ways to tackle this problem – particularly technology – do exist, and our team is exploring that, too.”

RBI and tax reduction

The RBI – one of the staunchest opponents of crypto in India and globally – would not register an objection if the Indian government chose to reduce its stiff taxes on crypto, the senior official said.

“Not only are taxes not in our mandate or domain, it is also not our concern,” the official said. "This is about legislation, and that is for the government to decide.”

The RBI has a history of wanting crypto to be banned. It had effectively prohibited crypto between 2018 and 2020 until a Supreme Court order overturned that effort. Since then, the central bank has expressed its concerns about crypto publicly and in several forums such as the Group of 20, where India led coordination for global regulation in the space.

If it maintains neutrality on the industry's biggest ask – the reduction of taxes – that could surprise many. A reduction of taxes could boost crypto trading volumes, which is something the RBI has argued could risk India's monetary stability.

A few days after CoinDesk’s interview with the senior official, India’s finance ministry chose not to reduce the nation's stiff taxes on crypto. Such announcements are usually made as part of the budget, and no change was expected because it was an interim spending plan ahead of national elections within two months. A full budget is expected in July 2024, and that's where the crypto sector may pin its hopes.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The industry has been pushing for a reduction in the taxes – particularly the 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on every transaction, if not the 30% tax on profits. The argument against the 1% tax may have greater weight after a study from a think tank revealed data that didn’t justify the tax and instead sought a 0.01% tax.

The RBI’s opposition to cryptocurrencies has remained constant. Even the recent approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S., didn’t change its stance; RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said India doesn't need to emulate anyone, as the emerging economies cannot afford the risk from crypto.

Startups and India’s CBDC

The RBI’s CBDC pilots could see the involvement of startups in the future, the official revealed.

As technology takes center stage in the evolution of CBDCs, startup founders in the crypto and tech space have contended that pilots could benefit from their involvement.

“India’s startups have the potential to help with the nation’s CBDC pilots,” said Aritra Sarkhel, head of corporate development at ANQ, a digital banking platform in India. “Not only could startups build on India’s CBDC but also contribute to the technology challenges that may arise as the pilot evolves.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Other nations such as Australia have seen private organizations take part in the exploration of CBDCs, but India has so far made this an in-house affair led by the fintech department of its central bank.

Edited by Jesse Hamilton.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Are Crypto Cards Struggling to Replace Visa?

Encrypted bank cards struggle to replace Visa due to fundamental differences in payment economics. Analysis reveals Visa’s fee is only about 7-9% of the total merchant discount rate (MDR), with the largest share (70-80%) going to issuing banks as interchange fees. Most crypto debit cards, operating on prepaid stablecoins like USDC, lack the credit-based revenue model of traditional reward credit cards. This results in significantly lower interchange income. Even with higher exempt rates for small banks, the total fee pool for a $100 stablecoin debit transaction is only about $0.62, leaving minimal room for profit sharing after covering network, processor, and bank costs. Stablecoins primarily innovate in the back-end settlement layer, enabling near real-time T+0 settlements on networks like Visa and Mastercard instead of the traditional T+2 cycle. This optimizes working capital for issuers but doesn't lower costs for merchants or improve the consumer checkout experience. Card networks are actively integrating stablecoins for settlement, seeing them as a system enhancement, not a threat. While stablecoins can reduce costs in cross-border payments by eliminating intermediaries and forex layers, this logic doesn't translate to domestic card payments where the cost structure is dominated by interchange fees. The core promise of bypassing card networks to save merchants money is flawed, as removing Visa only cuts the smallest fee component.

marsbitHá 8m

Why Are Crypto Cards Struggling to Replace Visa?

marsbitHá 8m

In the Era of MiCA, Why is the EU CASP License Becoming Increasingly Important?

In the MiCA era, the EU's Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) license is becoming increasingly crucial, especially after the transitional period ends on July 1, 2026. Post-deadline, crypto service providers operating under old national frameworks must either secure MiCA authorization or exit the EU market, rendering the previous model of using a single member state's VASP registration for pan-European operations obsolete. The CASP license fundamentally changes the regulatory landscape by shifting from a fragmented, nation-by-nation registration system to a unified "passporting" regime. Authorized in one member state, a CASP can provide its licensed services across the EU, offering greater legal clarity and operational efficiency compared to the past. MiCA defines CASP authorization based on specific service types, such as custody, trading platform operation, exchange, and transfer of crypto-assets. The scope of authorization is determined by actual business functions, not self-selection, with corresponding prudential requirements like capital adequacy. Banks and institutional clients increasingly value CASP status as it provides a verifiable, standardized framework for due diligence, accessible through ESMA's public registers. The regulation significantly limits the "reverse solicitation" exception for non-EU firms. Active marketing or outreach to EU clients generally necessitates a CASP license, moving away from reliance on offshore entities. It's important to note that a CASP license is not a universal permit; it covers crypto-asset services but does not automatically authorize traditional financial activities like payment services (governed by PSD2) or dealing in financial instruments (governed by MiFID II). A complete crypto-fiat payment solution often requires both a CASP and a licensed payment institution. Priority candidates for pursuing a CASP license include: 1) Platforms with the EU as a primary long-term market; 2) Projects seeking partnerships with EU banks or large institutions; and 3) Groups aiming to consolidate cross-border operations under one regulated entity. In contrast, early-stage projects without concrete EU plans may find the process premature. Ultimately, the growing importance of the CASP stems from the end of regulatory ambiguity in Europe. It has evolved from a consideration to a fundamental requirement for market access, client trust, and sustainable operations within the EU's now-harmonized crypto regulatory framework.

marsbitHá 10m

In the Era of MiCA, Why is the EU CASP License Becoming Increasingly Important?

marsbitHá 10m

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: Global Semiconductor Equipment WFE Grows 75% in Two Years, DRAM and Logic Chips Are the Biggest Drivers

Bernstein significantly raises its global Wafer Front-End (WFE) equipment spending forecast: $148B in 2026 (from $141B), $204B in 2027 (from $175B), and $259B in 2028 (from $198B). This represents a cumulative 75% growth over two years, confirming a strong equipment upcycle. Memory, especially DRAM, is the primary driver, with DRAM WFE expected to surge 53% in 2027 and 37% in 2028. Logic/Foundry follows, driven by advanced node investments. The forecast upgrades are broad-based, but the largest incremental contribution comes from memory spending outside China and logic/foundry expansion within China. Bernstein expects China's WFE demand to be resilient, jumping to $101B in 2028 from $573B in 2027 due to comprehensive expansion across memory, advanced logic, and mature nodes. A key factor is the DUV lithography shortage, which is expected to ease in H2 2026, allowing imports to recover. Top equipment picks include ASML (preferred in Europe) for its exposure to DRAM and advanced logic, and Applied Materials (top US pick) for its broad exposure and attractive valuation. In China, NAURA is favored due to its comprehensive product portfolio and significant advanced logic exposure. Bernstein views the recent sector pullback as an attractive entry point, arguing that market expectations for 2027/2028 demand strength remain too low and that supplier guidance is conservative.

marsbitHá 11m

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: Global Semiconductor Equipment WFE Grows 75% in Two Years, DRAM and Logic Chips Are the Biggest Drivers

marsbitHá 11m

The True Cost of Strategy Being Forced to 'Hoard' U.S. Dollars

The article analyzes MicroStrategy's (now Strategy) shift towards holding substantial US dollar reserves (currently $4.65 billion) while selling Bitcoin, contrasting this with its core identity as a Bitcoin-focused company. It argues this move is a strategic necessity specific to Strategy, driven by its unique business model of issuing "digital credit" (preferred securities) with fixed USD dividend obligations. To secure favorable credit ratings (e.g., S&P's B- rating, which penalizes Bitcoin-heavy balance sheets) and sustain this credit issuance, Strategy must demonstrate significant dollar liquidity. However, this cash hoarding imposes a heavy "invisible tax" or opportunity cost: capital allocated to low-yielding cash reserves cannot be deployed into Bitcoin, artificially raising the required return threshold on its actual Bitcoin investments to cover fixed dividend costs. The author concludes that Strategy is an extreme case, and most other Bitcoin-related companies should not blindly emulate this strategy. For them, dollar reserves should be dictated strictly by operational needs and prudent buffers, not arbitrary targets. Holding excess cash typically means forfeiting potential Bitcoin returns for uncertain benefits, making it economically unsound unless a company shares Strategy's specific credit-dependent capital structure. The decision ultimately hinges on a firm's unique business model and genuine cash flow requirements.

marsbitHá 15m

The True Cost of Strategy Being Forced to 'Hoard' U.S. Dollars

marsbitHá 15m

New Fed Correspondent: Inflation Data 'Neither Hot Nor Cold' Offers Fed Temporary Respite but Future Path Remains Uncertain

Inflation data for July came in as expected, providing the Federal Reserve with some breathing room ahead of its September meeting, though the longer-term policy path remains uncertain. The core CPI rose 0.2% month-over-month and 2.5% year-over-year, in line with forecasts, easing immediate pressure for a rate hike. Following the report, market expectations for a September rate increase fell below 50%. Despite the temporary respite, deep divisions persist within the Fed. At least six of the twelve voting members have recently signaled openness to further tightening, with three having voted for a hike in July. The debate centers on whether current rates are sufficiently restrictive to bring inflation back to the 2% target or if persistent factors like tariffs, energy prices, and surging demand from AI infrastructure necessitate more action. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly highlighted the growing complexity, outlining two potential scenarios: a baseline where inflationary pressures fade, allowing for rates to hold steady, and an alternative where shocks persist and inflation gains self-reinforcing momentum. She suggested that if the latter materializes, the policy response might need to be more aggressive than the typical 25-basis-point increments. With Fed Chair Wash adopting a less forward-leaning public stance, markets are closely monitoring data and other officials' comments for clues. The upcoming August CPI report, due just days before the September FOMC meeting, is now seen as a critical determinant for the final decision.

marsbitHá 15m

New Fed Correspondent: Inflation Data 'Neither Hot Nor Cold' Offers Fed Temporary Respite but Future Path Remains Uncertain

marsbitHá 15m

Trading

Spot
活动图片